I foresee a second Internet whose backbone would be peer-to-peer wireless routers, with everybody's routers connecting to other routers in the vicinity, without any connection to the World Wide Web.
A truly open source web, over which governments could have no control.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Stop it, you are going to make the geek trapped inside my body start to drool and mess up my keyboard.
2 posted on
08/19/2008 10:41:01 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(Forever a Newbie)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I like the idea, but broadcasting the internet would probably make our freedom-hating government censor it like they do television.
3 posted on
08/19/2008 10:41:18 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: E. Pluribus Unum
4 posted on
08/19/2008 10:42:39 AM PDT by
mo
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“A truly open source web, over which governments could have no control.”
~~~~~
Uh-huh!
That’s what “they” would have us believe....
Everything is proceeding nicely according to plan....
;)
Semper Fidelis
The “G” Dick
~~~~~~~~~~
7 posted on
08/19/2008 10:51:39 AM PDT by
gunnyg
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Which is exactly why the FCC will never let it occur.
Rumor has it, this has been part of their play to make Android (a portable device OS) and their move behind the google phone.
It's truly a great idea, and I applaud for it, and at least for saying that they are going to make a buck off of it too.
8 posted on
08/19/2008 10:52:36 AM PDT by
fightinbluhen51
("...If it moves, tax it, if it moves faster, regulate it, if it stops, subsidies it.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just do what you want with spectrum, and ignore governments. This is one case where anarchy is the best available model. (and yes, I hold an FCC license)
/johnny
10 posted on
08/19/2008 10:55:31 AM PDT by
JRandomFreeper
(Bless us all, each, and every one.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11 posted on
08/19/2008 10:56:38 AM PDT by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on Russia/China/DPRK et al.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A truly open source web, over which governments could have no control. So instead of the pornography superhighway, it will be the pornography super-duper highway?
14 posted on
08/19/2008 11:02:20 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Look at all the fees and taxes added to your telephone bill...almost 40% of my monthly charge. Now imagine similar taxes and fees on your Internet service bill. Internet access and commerce is seen by bureaucrats and politicians as a great untapped source of new taxes. FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein has already discussed making broadband Internet access universal so that those of us currently with broadband will be taxed to make it available to the six people with computers in middle of nowhere South Dakota.
16 posted on
08/19/2008 11:21:32 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Is this the same Google that was helping the Chinese government censor access to the Internet for political reasons? I'm sure their primary motivation is freedom and not money.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I foresee a second Internet whose backbone would be peer-to-peer wireless routers, with everybody's routers connecting to other routers in the vicinity, without any connection to the World Wide Web. A truly open source web, over which governments could have no control.Hey, that's what my company builds! Funny thing about peer-to-peer routing that liberates people from their ISP's... There's almost no money to be made from it. Go figure. :)
Seriously, though, this is exactly what my company is working on. Drop me a line if you want more info.
23 posted on
08/19/2008 12:21:39 PM PDT by
Omedalus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson