Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN'S NOVEMBER SURPRISE
http://www.janereinheimer.com ^ | August 21, 2008 | Jane Reinheimer

Posted on 08/21/2008 8:10:10 AM PDT by quintr

This is an in-between day. It's as if people are holding their breaths, maybe planning a quick shopping trip to pick up last minute stuff before they head off to Denver where the Democratic National Convention will begin on the 25th.

The invitations are in the mail. Mine hasn't arrived yet, so I guess I won't be going. And I won't be going to St. Paul either when the Republicans get together for their big hoohah. That one I'd actually like to go to. Not since Ronald Reagan changed his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican has there been the likes of the possibility that Joe Lieberman, the independent from Connecticut who was dumped by the Democratic party may be announcing that he's going to join the Republican party.

Wow! That is a really huge big deal. That would be just enough to tip the majority in the Senate over to the Republican party.

Poor Harry Reid, senate majority leader. Whatever will he do between now and January when all the new congressionals get sworn in.

If Lieberman's party switch is a precursor to his being named vice president, then I'll tell you one thing. We had all better pray really really hard for the health of both McCain and Lieberman. Both of these gentlemen qualify as elderly statesmen.

Now don't misunderstand me. You can bet that we need all that wisdom in the Oval Office, and I'm not being sarcastic. With the way the world is right now, we don't need some junior senator from Illinois clogging up the process while he's getting fitted with a cloak of statesmanship and patriotism.

But with McCain at the age of 71 and Lieberman (if he were vice president) at age 66, nothing about life can be taken for granted. And God forbid, if anything should happen that would incapacitate both of these gentlemen, there sits Nancy I-Can-Hear-Her-Salivating-For-More-Power-Now Pelosi poised and ready for action as the third heartbeat from the Oval Office.

If that isn't enough motivation to make each and every Republican precinct captain in this country get out there and start walking the beat, I don't know what would.

But truthfully, Lieberman's position as the tipping point Republican in the Senate would be far more advantageous than his being vice president. That's just my opinion. I pray for his health and McCain's health and well-being anyway. But if not Lieberman, who will it be?

But in any event, let's all get together and make taking back the House our November surprise!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; congress; democrats; elections; joementum; lieberman; mccain; novembersurprise; reid; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2008 8:10:10 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quintr
Not since Ronald Reagan changed his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican has there been the likes of the possibility that Joe Lieberman, the independent from Connecticut who was dumped by the Democratic party may be announcing that he's going to join the Republican party.

Lousy comparison.

Reagan was already a conservative.

Lieberman is a flaming liberal.
2 posted on 08/21/2008 8:14:10 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You are right. Thats not a good comparison. However, I do believe that there will be a substantial portion of people like Lieberman voting for McCain.


3 posted on 08/21/2008 8:18:13 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I do believe that there will be a substantial portion of people like Lieberman voting for McCain.
4 posted on 08/21/2008 8:24:00 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (His Negritude has made his negritude the central theme of this campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quintr
Lieberman will never again find his way onto a major party ticket for national office.

Nobody like that with a pattern of speech that can best be described as a simpering whine can ever command the "stage presence" to win a national election. He was added to the Democratic ticket in 2000 by party bigwigs -- without Gore's approval, BTW -- to repay him for his pathetic party loyalty during the Clinton impeachment debacle.

5 posted on 08/21/2008 8:25:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Republicans...Democrats....I see very little difference.

Lieberman don’t have to change his party affiliation to be a VP. A lesson in history would remind Americans that in Presidential elections early in our nation, there was no selection of VP. Each candidate ran under his own affiliation. The top vote getter was President. The second vote getter was VP.

We weren’t electing a party. We were electing a leader.


6 posted on 08/21/2008 8:30:49 AM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quintr
All I want Lieberman to do:

Give a nice speech at the RNC convention praising McCain and condemning Demcorats for their anti-semitism.

Cut ads for McCain and run them in Florida (Broward and Palm Beach counties).

7 posted on 08/21/2008 8:31:48 AM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quintr

If Joe were to get up in front of the GOP convention, announce that not only was he solidly in support of John McCain, but that after much soul searching that he was forced to abandon his former pro-choice position because he had become convinced that John McCain was right, that at the moment of conception, that is when an unborn child’s human rights begin.

He states that he will work tirelessly to overturn Roe v. Wade, and asks the Convention if they would accept him as a new member of the Party.

You would see at least a half hour or more of standing ovations, cheers, and celebratory chaos, and rightly so.

Let’s not say it can’t happen, miracles DO still happen, and I’m praying for Joe.


8 posted on 08/21/2008 8:33:48 AM PDT by mkjessup ("People are going to begin to wonder if Russia can be trusted!" - SecState Maddy Rice, well DUH!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Point taken. Even though that’s not the way it is now.

I would welcome Lieberman’s party change if for no other reason that to tip the balance in the Senate to Republican.

And yes, as the poster following you, Lieberman has a following and can help with the Florida vote. But he wouldn’t need to be a VP candidate to do that. I suspect he’ll campaign in Florida anyway for McCain.

But you have to admit, this is going to be the most interesting presidential campaign in recent memory.


9 posted on 08/21/2008 8:35:27 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quintr
Wow! That is a really huge big deal. That would be just enough to tip the majority in the Senate over to the Republican party.

Yes, but the Dems would still be in control. The operations, including leadership, of the Senate are put in place at the start of the Congressional session. They don't become null/void if the majority changes, only if there is a vote to change them. And should Lieberman flip sides, the GOP won't have the supermajority necessary to change them. Dingy stays Majority Leader and continues running the show.
10 posted on 08/21/2008 8:35:30 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quintr

Great, just what we need, another RINO.


11 posted on 08/21/2008 8:37:24 AM PDT by Sparticus (Libs, they're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

You would prefer Lieberman to be standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Obama-lama-ding-dong and singing HIS praises to the American people? Lieberman has been one of the most critical voices of the One, and that does count for something.

i.e., “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.


12 posted on 08/21/2008 8:40:13 AM PDT by mkjessup ("People are going to begin to wonder if Russia can be trusted!" - SecState Maddy Rice, well DUH!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

thanks for the heads up


13 posted on 08/21/2008 8:43:23 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: quintr

the dems are going to pick up 3-5 seats in november so even if he does change itll be irrelevant. he should have thought about this in january 2007, not now.


14 posted on 08/21/2008 8:43:30 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

“...Lieberman has been one of the most critical voices of the One, and that does count for something...”

Amen to that!


15 posted on 08/21/2008 8:45:23 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
You would prefer Lieberman to be standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Obama-lama-ding-dong and singing HIS praises to the American people? Lieberman has been one of the most critical voices of the One, and that does count for something. i.e., “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

Oh, I appreciate his opposition to his One-ness alright, as well as his position on the war, but do we really want another lefty diluting the Republican party voice?

16 posted on 08/21/2008 8:53:03 AM PDT by Sparticus (Libs, they're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

“Each candidate ran under his own affiliation. The top vote getter was President. The second vote getter was VP.”

That sounds like a good approach. Why did it change?


17 posted on 08/21/2008 8:57:48 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quintr
But in any event, let's all get together and make taking back the House our November surprise!

More like November Miracle, judging by the polls.

18 posted on 08/21/2008 8:59:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
That sounds like a good approach. Why did it change?

Awful idea given the wide differences in the two parties today (or at least the differences in their bases) and the fact that the VP is next in line to be POTUS if POTUS is incapacitated.


19 posted on 08/21/2008 9:11:19 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

When the Constitution was written, they had no idea that political parties would develop. In 1800 the Jeffersonian Republicans edged out the Federalists in the electoral college, but both Jefferson and Burr had identical electoral vote totals, which meant that the House of Representatives had to determine the winner—and it was dominated by Federalists who were so hostile to Jefferson they would rather see Burr win, or perhaps allow March 4 to arrive with no one chosen to be the new President.


20 posted on 08/21/2008 9:12:44 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson