Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: impeachedrapist
My actions would be a REACTION to gunfire. No premeditation whatsoever.

You seem to think that the second dog was killed in its owner's back yard. It's more likely that both were shot in "Wyatt Earp"'s yard, then one managed to wriggle back under the fence before assuming room temperature.

Hearing gunfire on your neighbor's property is NOT sufficient cause to start shooting at people. It would not be self-defense, and would be considered negligent homicide at the very least.

81 posted on 08/26/2008 6:49:03 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel
You seem to think that the second dog was killed in its owner's back yard.

Given his previous threat(s), I find it more likely that he shot the second dog in its yard and then lied than I do that the wounded animal crawled back under the fence.

The fact is none of us know what really transpired. And I think the guy telling the story is full of it.

87 posted on 08/26/2008 6:54:22 AM PDT by impeachedrapist (Ssshh! I'm a liberal plant AND a stalker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson