[tacticalogic]

Science has established dogma when it demands the adherence to the ToE at the cost of a scientists career. Anyone who does not adhere to, even dares to question it, might as well kiss that career good-by.

No dissent allowed.

You can question anything you want. Just be prepared to back it up with evidence. A scientist that can't do that isn't going to have much of a career. Get over it.

[GourmetDan]

"You can question anything you want. Just be prepared to back it up with evidence. A scientist that can't do that isn't going to have much of a career."

'Science' gets to make up any after-the-fact story it wants as long as the evidence is interpreted through the filter of the philosophy of naturalism. No other filters are allowed because naturalists actually believe that equating technological success and origins philosophy is appropriate.

It never occurs to them that their equivocation begs the very question they are being challenged on.

"Get over it."

"The use of unnecessary rudeness has been approved." (adapted from The Blues Brothers)

[metmom]

You can question anything you want. Just be prepared to back it up with evidence.

As far as I know they have, but then there's that tendency for scientists/evos to declare that anything that could possibly be used to disprove the ToE is "not science" before hand and therefore is not admissible as evidence.

I've seen too many evos on this forum challenge creationists to that very thing, find evidence to disprove evo, and then laugh and say *if that's possible*.

The mindset is that if it supports evo, it's science, and it it doesn't, it's not really science so it doesn't count.

Automatically writing off anything that would make it look bad is intellectually dishonest. It merely reinforces the observation made by non-evos of .... No dissent allowed.