Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2008 8:05:06 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Flavius

‘impossible to intercept’

particle beam weapon.


2 posted on 09/29/2008 8:08:18 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Wow, uninerceptable. I wonder if it’s uninterceptable as well....


3 posted on 09/29/2008 8:08:31 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

I don’t know the scope of all of this. I am mindful of an old bromide: What is possible is done. What is impossible will be done.


4 posted on 09/29/2008 8:08:40 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Faster than the speed of light?


5 posted on 09/29/2008 8:08:40 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

what difference does it make?...if the whiners and wimps like the ones here on fr get bamey elected, he won’t even have a missile defense....fire away , Russia....


6 posted on 09/29/2008 8:10:22 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Yeah, and the Titanic was unsinkable too.


7 posted on 09/29/2008 8:11:22 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Really big gas tank, or really short range.


8 posted on 09/29/2008 8:12:15 PM PDT by Tarpon (Barrack Obama will ban all the guns he has the votes for ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

If this is really a “cruise missle” it is intended to fly over long distances to a target for a precision strike. That takes fuel, lots of it. So does flying at supersonic speed which takes MUCH more fuel. Something wrong with this picture....if this thing does fly at Mach 2.5 it can only be for a very short time, probably at the terminal point of its flight.....

Regardless, it is fully vulnerable at its “slow flight” mode....and at Mach 2.5 it sacrifices much maneuverability needed for a precision strike. Something wrong here....


9 posted on 09/29/2008 8:12:53 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Russia is outsourcing their weaponology? Sweet.
10 posted on 09/29/2008 8:13:07 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
In the words of Frankie Goes To Hollywood:

Laser Beam Me!
11 posted on 09/29/2008 8:13:17 PM PDT by Mr. Binnacle (Keep on talking, Joe Biden, keep on talking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Another hypersonic missile announcement from Russia. How many of these claims have we heard over the past 10 years?


12 posted on 09/29/2008 8:15:04 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

All I can say is never say never.


13 posted on 09/29/2008 8:15:37 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Just rearrange the letters and it is a Sham, Bro.


14 posted on 09/29/2008 8:18:20 PM PDT by Mr. Binnacle (Keep on talking, Joe Biden, keep on talking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Yeah, but will it fly?


16 posted on 09/29/2008 8:19:50 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
A joint Russian-Indian company has started the development of a cruise missile capable of flying at Mach 5

Even the Russkies are outsourcing their defence work!

17 posted on 09/29/2008 8:21:17 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Lemme get this straight...

India, well known for people who screw up my customer accounts from US 1-800 # lines due to the fact they couldn’t speak English and worship cows who take a dump in their city streets...combined with Russians, who lost their Soviet satellites to Reagan’s doctrine, have created an UNinterceptable’ (Bush-speak) missile?

I have a bridge to sell to you guys...


19 posted on 09/29/2008 8:24:16 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Haven’t we been researching & developing scramjet projectiles too? Seems like I read about it 5 years ago.


22 posted on 09/29/2008 8:33:39 PM PDT by FreeInWV (A moose bit my sister. Then Sarah Palin shot it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Only if you’re shooting after it with something typically slower that needs to catch up with it. Of course if you’re shooting at it on the receiving end (the whole point - it will be coming AT you not away from you), an intercept projectile can calculate the projected intercept point regardless of how fast it’s going. So, ridiculous claim.


26 posted on 09/29/2008 8:38:56 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Just need to explode some chaff in front of it. The kinetic energy will take it out. Also, can’t out run a laser.

An AMRAAM is ~ MACH 4.


30 posted on 09/29/2008 8:45:05 PM PDT by cruise_missile (''Edward - Jones:High commissions for lousy investment advice! Making cents out of $.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Cant burn that fast that long, would have to be huge to contain the fuel

so, would have to be fired close in, within 15 miles or so to maintain that speed for that flight


33 posted on 09/29/2008 8:47:32 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson