Posted on 10/08/2008 4:23:04 PM PDT by wingsof liberty
Ross Perot.
There is the reason Clinton won in 1992.
A picture is worth a thousand words!
That picture puts a face on Ayers as well as putting a face on his other associations and needs little explanation!
McCain should hold that photo up to the people and to Obama at the next debate,, ask Obama to explain why he chose to launch his political future out of that man’s living room!
Show the photo!
Start by using Bill Ayers and Timothy McVeigh in the same sentence. People will start to care.
It’s not that it wasn’t mentioned before, because it has. The problem is that it hasn’t been fully investigated....we need to follow it to “ground”.
The news media has spent more time and effort in vetting Sarah’s kids than they have obama.
Also, I’m not only concerned about his acquaintances, but also very interested in those years he was in college. Seems like a black hole.... wonder why?
I was telling someone at work, this would be a good plot for a spy book where the old KGB plants a mole years ago and slowly waits for the right time to make a move. BTW..another curious question (may have been answered already)...how did he pay for all this “upscale” education? Was he funded? Follow the money.....
I know this sounds like a conspiracy theory...but how can we say it’s not, until the light is turned on and the facts are on the table?
I chalk that up to the people not caring. They didn't like Bush and wanted to punish him, even if we got Slick. The same will happen this time, but BO is worse than Slick.
Don't get me wrong, I have a heap of problems with the RINO party, but voting for anyone else IS A VOTE FOR THE RATS.
The time to deal with the RINOs was in the primaries. We failed to do that, but let's not add insult to injury.
The biggest thing Obama’s supporters care about is how much free stuff they’re going to get from the government. The only way to make them doubt him is to make them realize they won’t be getting what he promises. I know that’s challenging, but harping on Ayers & stuff is only preaching to the choir - his supporters could care less about that.
Oh ya, heck I care...what’s the connection?
Americans don't know jack about the economy.
The world is a much more dangerous place today as well.
Our country survived the Clinton presidency reasonably well. I'm not at all convinced the same will be true of an Obama presidency.
bfl
Really? One of my wife's professional colleagues is a big Hussein supporter (female, pro-choice). Not a luncheon goes by without her spewing some invective directed towards Palin.
Now here's the weird thing: her oldest son is in the Army medical corps (based in Hawaii). Her reaction to the Hussein/Ayers relationship? She simply doesn't believe it's true; none of it.
It's not that she doesn't care - she simply denies that it's true. How many others are in a state of shock/denial regarding their chosen One? Wait until the Kenyan "problem" perks up over the next few days.
I don't believe that people really understand how horrific the Weathermen were, but we do understand what Mc Veigh did. Pointing out McVeigh's actions as to who Bill Ayers really is may help people understand how incredibly dangerous this guy is.
Ayers is an individual who should have NO ASSOCIATION with anyone who is running for President.
I agree!
I hope to God your right. By the way, if all that was necessary to run the free world was flowery speeches and the ability to read off a teleprompter, I would vote for The One myself!
The greatest practical cause behind the fact that voters don’t seem to care is the fact that the MSM are corrupt and vacuous, both intellectually and morally. Even if they present the truth about Obama, if that presentation is done in a way that makes it seem like it’s no big deal, then the voters won’t care. Sad but true. If they were to present the truth with the gravitas/frequency/intensity with which they would present it regarding any Republican, then the voters would care.
Exactly! If Obama had been properly vetted like any other candidate should have been, he wouldnt be so damned popular. We cant have that from the Lamestream Media, can we?
McCain should hold that photo up to the people and to Obama at the next debate,, ask Obama to explain why he chose to launch his political future out of that man’s living room!
Michelle Malkin said it best: For Obama to claim he didnt know about Ayers past means he is either A) The most ignorant politician in the world or B) a liar. Neither quality is particularly favorable for a presidential candidate.
The only way to make them doubt him is to make them realize they won’t be getting what he promises.
Lets not kid ourselves here - the hard core Obama Kool-Aid drinkers would support him even if he tuned out to be a mass murderer.
“It’s 1992 all over again......Bill Clinton was a slimy dude with a lot of baggage and illicit associations.”
First, 57% of the people voted AGAINST Bill Clinton in 1992. He only pulld in 43% of the vote. Perot sucked off alot of votes from Bush Sr. Clinton won 12 states by less than 3% that year. If Perot isn’t ther, Bush wins.
Second, People do care. They just don’t know. Many non partisian voters who didn’t pay attention during the Primaries are hearing about Ayers and Rezko and Wright for the first time.
Just wait until Jermome Corsi gets back. He’s got the evidence to derail the Obama campaign.
I’m not at all convinced the same will be true of an Obama presidency.
Thank you. I didnt much care for Bubba, but I am PETRIFIED of Obama. I firmly beleive that if he becomes POTUS, this country will in 4 years, at worst - lay in ruins, and at best, bear a striking resemblance to the USSR of the 70s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.