Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nobody’s dummy (Camille Paglia on Sarah Palin)(Surprising!)
Salon ^ | 10/9/2008 | Camille Paglia

Posted on 10/08/2008 7:59:51 PM PDT by markomalley

Yes, both Todd and Sarah Palin, whom most people in the U.S. and abroad had never even heard of until six weeks ago, have emerged as powerful new symbols of a revived contemporary feminism. That the macho Todd, with his champion athleticism and working-class cred, can so amiably cradle babies and care for children is a huge step forward in American sexual symbolism.

Although nothing will sway my vote for Obama, I continue to enjoy Sarah Palin’s performance on the national stage. During her vice-presidential debate last week with Joe Biden (whose conspiratorial smiles with moderator Gwen Ifill were outrageous and condescending toward his opponent), I laughed heartily at Palin’s digs and slams and marveled at the way she slowly took over the entire event. I was sorry when it ended! But Biden wasn’t — judging by his Gore-like sighs and his slow sinking like a punctured blimp. Of course Biden won on points, but TV (a visual medium) never cares about that.

The mountain of rubbish poured out about Palin over the past month would rival Everest. What a disgrace for our jabbering army of liberal journalists and commentators, too many of whom behaved like snippy jackasses. The bourgeois conventionalism and rank snobbery of these alleged humanitarians stank up the place. As for Palin’s brutally edited interviews with Charlie Gibson and that viper, Katie Couric, don’t we all know that the best bits ended up on the cutting-room floor? Something has gone seriously wrong with Democratic ideology, which seems to have become a candied set of holier-than-thou bromides attached like tutti-frutti to a quivering green Jell-O mold of adolescent sentimentality.

And where is all that lurid sexual fantasy coming from? When I watch Sarah Palin, I don’t think sex — I think Amazon warrior! I admire her competitive spirit and her exuberant vitality, which borders on the supernormal. The question that keeps popping up for me is whether Palin, who was born in Idaho, could possibly be part Native American (as we know her husband is), which sometimes seems suggested by her strong facial contours. I have felt that same extraordinary energy and hyper-alertness billowing out from other women with Native American ancestry — including two overpowering celebrity icons with whom I have worked.

One of the most idiotic allegations batting around out there among urban media insiders is that Palin is “dumb.” Are they kidding? What level of stupidity is now par for the course in those musty circles? (The value of Ivy League degrees, like sub-prime mortgages, has certainly been plummeting. As a Yale Ph.D., I have a perfect right to my scorn.) People who can’t see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism — the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.

As someone whose first seven years were spent among Italian-American immigrants (I never met an elderly person who spoke English until we moved from Endicott to rural Oxford, New York, when I was in first grade), I am very used to understanding meaning through what might seem to others to be outlandish or fractured variations on standard English. Furthermore, I have spent virtually my entire teaching career (nearly four decades) in arts colleges, where the expressiveness of highly talented students in dance, music and the visual arts takes a hundred different forms. Finally, as a lover of poetry (my last book was about that), I savor every kind of experimentation with standard English — beginning with Shakespeare, who was the greatest improviser of them all at a time when there were no grammar rules.

Many others listening to Sarah Palin at her debate went into conniptions about what they assailed as her incoherence or incompetence. But I was never in doubt about what she intended at any given moment. On the contrary, I was admiring not only her always shapely and syncopated syllables but the innate structures of her discourse — which did seem to fly by in fragments at times but are plainly ready to be filled with deeper policy knowledge, as she gains it (hopefully over the next eight years of the Obama presidencies). This is a tremendously talented politician whose moment has not yet come. That she holds views completely opposed to mine is irrelevant.

Even if she disappears from the scene forever after a McCain defeat, Palin will still have made an enormous and lasting contribution to feminism. As I said in my last column, Palin has made the biggest step forward in reshaping the persona of female authority since Madonna danced her dominatrix way through the shattered puritan barricades of the feminist establishment. In 1990, in a highly controversial New York Times op-ed that attacked old-guard feminist ideology, I declared that “Madonna is the future of feminism” — a prophecy that was ridiculed at the time but that turned out to be quite true. Madonna put pro-sex feminism on the international map.

But it is now 18 years later — the span of an entire generation. The instabilities and diminishments for young women raised in an increasingly shallow media environment have become all too obvious. I had grown up in a vibrant pop culture with glorious women stars of voluptuous sensuality — above all Elizabeth Taylor, sewn into that silky white slip as the vixen Manhattan call girl of “Butterfield 8.” In college, I feasted on foreign films starring sexual sophisticates like Jeanne Moreau, Anouk Aimée and Catherine Deneuve. Sex today, however, has become brittle and superficial. Except for the occasional diverting flash of Lindsay Lohan’s borrowed bosom, I see nothing whatever that is worth a second glance. Pro-sex feminism has worked itself out and, like all movements, has degenerated into clichés. And even Madonna, with her skeletal megalomania, looks like a refugee from a horror movie.

The next phase of feminism must circle back and reappropriate the ancient persona of the mother — without losing career ambition or power of assertion. Betty Friedan, who had first attacked the cult of postwar domesticity, had long warned second-wave feminists such as Gloria Steinem about the damaging exclusion of homemakers from their value system. The animus of liberal feminists toward religion must also end (I am speaking as an atheist). Feminism must reexamine all of its assumptions, including its death grip on abortion, if it wishes to survive.

The hysterical emotionalism and eruptions of amoral malice at the arrival of Sarah Palin exposed the weaknesses and limitations of current feminism. But I am convinced that Palin’s bracing mix of male and female voices, as well as her grounding in frontier grit and audacity, will prove to be a galvanizing influence on aspiring Democratic women politicians too, from the municipal level on up. Palin has shown a brand-new way of defining female ambition — without losing femininity, spontaneity or humor. She’s no pre-programmed wonk of the backstage Hillary Clinton school; she’s pugnacious and self-created, the product of no educational or political elite — which is why her outsider style has been so hard for media lemmings to comprehend. And by the way, I think Tina Fey’s witty impersonations of Palin have been fabulous. But while Fey has nailed Palin’s cadences and charm, she can’t capture the energy, which is a force of nature.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; paglia; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: buccaneer81

Maybe the RNC should come out with a new campaign ad:

Obama - Not you’re Grandpa’s Democrat


61 posted on 10/08/2008 9:06:54 PM PDT by WKL815 (If the phrase "personal responsibility" makes you defensive, you may be a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: markomalley

Not shocking at all.

Camille is attracted to strong women.

Camille has the hots for Madonna (or used to anyway), and now she has the hots for Sarah.


64 posted on 10/08/2008 9:15:14 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
Yes, like I said, she is the only rational sounding one out there on the subject of Palin. And she is one heck of a writer.
65 posted on 10/08/2008 9:21:48 PM PDT by allmendream (Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Let me restate that for you ...
It's a rare FReeper that can recognize the wisdom of a socialist author(Durant). Kudos.
66 posted on 10/08/2008 9:56:40 PM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m from the Endicott and Oxford areas.....bet I know people that know Paglia....hmmmm


67 posted on 10/08/2008 10:15:43 PM PDT by cherry ( and boys, don't get caught watching the paint dry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

can we trust any person voting for the cancer that is hussein?...no, I don’t think so....they are either really stupid, really corrupt, gay, or intellectually dishonest and a traitor...that is just how I feel....


68 posted on 10/08/2008 10:18:03 PM PDT by cherry ( and boys, don't get caught watching the paint dry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

Durant wrote the greatest set of books on history we have, and before PC cleaned them up.


69 posted on 10/09/2008 5:03:38 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Although nothing will sway my vote for Obama,...”
Translation: I know obama is a bag of crap but as a mindless liberal I HAVE to vote for him.


70 posted on 10/09/2008 5:27:06 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
She reminds me of Oriana Fallaci.

Fr. Z said the same thing in his post about Paglia's column.

71 posted on 10/09/2008 5:50:02 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Scythian
before PC cleaned them up.

Did they publish new editions that were put through the PC filter?

73 posted on 10/09/2008 6:00:41 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
It's down in the comment section:
Reading Camille Paglia on Sarah Palin
74 posted on 10/09/2008 6:04:40 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: ELS
Reading Camille Paglia on Sarah Palin
76 posted on 10/09/2008 6:16:25 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

Sorry about that! See reply #76.


77 posted on 10/09/2008 6:17:32 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: markomalley

Good writer or not to say that nothing will change her vote for Obama is scary. By that does she mean not Ayers, or Obama’s 1996 Socialist party membership or Odinga or any of his other shady friends. Party above country or common sense?


79 posted on 10/09/2008 7:53:42 AM PDT by nclaurel (No white flags from America in Iraq--hear that Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson