Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/11/2008 8:36:57 AM PDT by Oyarsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oyarsa
Paul Emery Washington is a direct descendant of George Washington, our nation's first president

Lemme guess, Pauly is voting Obama/Palin, right?

2 posted on 10/11/2008 8:41:44 AM PDT by itsthejourney (1 of every 10 people you pass in the mall is here illegally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa
George Washington never fathered any children, so this man is NOT a direct descendant.
3 posted on 10/11/2008 8:42:11 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa

Garbage published by the Liberal MSM is not worth reading.

Half of Free Republic is also not worth reading, because it is a republication of garbage published by the Liberal MSM.

This article is certainly part of that half.


8 posted on 10/11/2008 8:47:04 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa

> perhaps the only man in history who turned down the position of monarch.

Not so! Truth in Advertizing!

Julius Caesar refused to become Emperor of Rome. That didn’t stop him getting backstabbed, tho’.


11 posted on 10/11/2008 8:50:37 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa

I’m the third cousin six times removed of Bushrod Washington, George’s nephew and one of the worst Supreme Court justices in our history. So what does that make me? A princess?


22 posted on 10/11/2008 9:31:22 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa
Frivolous article by a stupid writer. The story itself admits that George Washington had no children, but talks about 8,000 descendants. The term is relatives, not descendants, moron.

1) There is no evidence that a monarchy was seriously considered by the Constitutional Convention.

2) There is no evidence that Washington would have accepted the throne if offered to him.

3) Yes, Washington may have been able to pull an Oliver Cromwell and use the Continental Army to overthrow the Continental Congress(would the army have followed him? Your guess is as good as mine.), but he didn't so that ends that. George III called Washington “the greatest man in Christendom” for resigning his commission and disbanding the army, which still was waiting on payment of back pay. Eventually the soldiers got their money.

4) If offered the throne, and if accepted by Washington there is no reason to assume it would be hereditary. It may have been elective, like Poland or the Papal States.

5) Assuming it was hereditary, since Washington had no descendants either the Constitutional Convention would have had to provide a mechanism for the succession, perhaps picking the successor themselves, or leaving it to Washington to designate a successor. Perhaps he would have picked someone like Alexander Hamilton instead of a relative?

6) And finally there is no reason to assume that this new monarchy would not have joined the the Empire of Mexico, the Empire of Brazil, the Empire of Haiti, the Kingdom of Patagonia, or the Kingdom of Hawaii on the trash heap of history in a generation or two. The only monarchies that still rule any territory in the New World are monarchies of the Old World, like the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands.

It may be cool to be a relative of George Washington, but I suggest these people not worry about what might have happened and get on with their lives.

24 posted on 10/11/2008 10:00:18 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Democratic Underground: where PCP is not just for breakfast anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa

The U.S. presidency is for all intents and purposes an elected monarchy and has been for some time. It does not have some of the superficially trappings of European style monarchies, but that’s just a matter of style.


26 posted on 10/11/2008 12:25:34 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Note: this topic is from October 11, 2008.

Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


27 posted on 05/28/2010 6:41:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa
Except that Paul Emery Washington is a direct descendant of George Washington, our nation's first president and perhaps the only man in history who turned down the position of monarch.

No, "Paul Emery Washington" is NOT a direct descendant of George Washington. Washington had no children.

He can be a indirect descendant but not a direct descendant. Words mean things.

28 posted on 05/28/2010 6:45:16 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (there are huge chunks of time...at night...where I'm just asleep...for hours...it's ridiculous....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oyarsa
Washington had no children, therefore no direct decendants.
30 posted on 05/29/2010 8:18:30 AM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson