Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Numbers Prove That An Obama Victory in Ohio Is Very Unlikely
October 13 2008 | jveritas

Posted on 10/13/2008 11:41:15 AM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: MooseChic
I know some of those 20% who voted for Hillary.....One is a man over 65 and a life long foot stoppin' Democrat.....the other was recently widowed, single mom of a 6 year old also rabid Democrat

Neither one would even entertain the thought of voting for O'bomber...they're both going for McCain...I was absolutely shocked (but Pleased)......i never would have thought I'd see the day.

41 posted on 10/13/2008 11:58:16 AM PDT by thingumbob (McGenius-Palin beats O'bomber-Hide'n (Remember, dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

So, ignore the polls and what people are saying. When I look at websites that try to predict the electoral votes, well, . . . . If you go by land area, it’s mostly red. By electoral vote count, not so much. And yet they say they’re trying to be fair. Someone on the internet wouldn’t lie to me, would they? Why, that would be mean.


42 posted on 10/13/2008 11:58:40 AM PDT by teethodore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

And I care about gold getting killed because?


43 posted on 10/13/2008 11:59:07 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I would not give up on PA either. NH looks good at this point.


44 posted on 10/13/2008 11:59:37 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (GO Sarah Palin !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Primetimedonna

Yes they have allowed one week this month of same day registration and voting in Ohio but only 5000 people voted. The Obama campaign expected 25,000 to 40,000 people to do so. This tell you that there is a lot of unrealistic hype about Obama so called ground game. They tried this ground game in Ohio during the primaries and they still lost by almost 10 points to Hillary Clinton.


45 posted on 10/13/2008 12:00:07 PM PDT by jveritas (Use the nuclear option against Obama: Jeremiah Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Umm, did you see the story about ACORN ordering the absentee ballots for at least some of their newly registered “voters?”


46 posted on 10/13/2008 12:01:05 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
I did a similar analysis for Pennsylvania and it proves that McCain has a very good chance at winning Pennsylvania.
47 posted on 10/13/2008 12:01:23 PM PDT by jveritas (Use the nuclear option against Obama: Jeremiah Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Good to see the large crowds. Just wished it equated to rising poll numbers for McCain.

It's hard for that to happen when the polls are more and more turning into artificial creations of the MSM and related organisations.

Always remember - look at the internals of a poll. If the polls says Obama is ahead by 8, but has a partisan breakdown of 29% R to 43% D, it's a bogus poll.

48 posted on 10/13/2008 12:01:35 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
I hope that Palin can drag McCain across the finish line

Uh huh.

49 posted on 10/13/2008 12:01:55 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: teethodore

You’ve really gotten off on the wrong foot, on several threads. Newbies should learn the players and the culture before getting snarky or cute. It’s like starting a new job or moving into a new neighborhood. You need to observe.


50 posted on 10/13/2008 12:02:05 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Of course we (Freepers) know that these are slanted polls. But do the undecided/swing voters? All they might read or hear are the main campaign headlines, including what the MSM states who is ahead in the polls.


51 posted on 10/13/2008 12:03:13 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

My wife’s Gandma (94) stated this weekend that she would not vote for O’Bomber. The family is shocked as she has voted Democratic since the age of 21. 73 years as a Demo and she is not going to vote for the Demos this time.


52 posted on 10/13/2008 12:03:54 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
My wife’s Gandma (94) stated this weekend that she would not vote for O’Bomber. The family is shocked as she has voted Democratic since the age of 21. 73 years as a Demo and she is not going to vote for the Demos this time.

My wife's great aunt, who is 89 and reflexively votes Dem because she's still voting for Roosevelt has told us she is not even voting this year, since she can't stand 0bama. Not as good as her voting for McWhatshisname-Palin, but at least she won't be contributing to 0bama's vote total in NC.

53 posted on 10/13/2008 12:06:21 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

what you fail to factor in is that Bush had a fantastic ground game cared for by Rove. McCain doesn’t have such a vehicle to turn out the rural votes for him. The base is afraid of obama, but that doesn’t drive the masses to the polls. People need to vote for something not just against something. Many republicans will not vote acrosst he country.


54 posted on 10/13/2008 12:06:44 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

But any two or Co, NV and IN and McCain is in trouble. I do not believe he will win IN. We have a very popular Rep Gov up for re-election and three landslide caliber Congressman, but the old Carson machine and the NW region near Chicago are known for great fraud operations, and of course if all the college kids that came to the free concerts and registered get up to vote for the Messiah it could get dicey. I have said if IN is not called by 6:30-7:00 then McCain is in trouble nationwide.


55 posted on 10/13/2008 12:07:39 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

“I am engineer.”

That explains the fondness for numbers. And the missing “an.”

How does an economist get out of a deep pit? First, he assumes he has a ladder.

What did the engineer say to the supermodel in a red Ferrari? Can I look under the hood?


56 posted on 10/13/2008 12:08:17 PM PDT by teethodore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Same numbers game is true in PA.

Fauxbama cannot win this election, I know they are claiming these massive frauds, and believe me there has been massive fraud in voter registrations.. but the one thing that’s being overlooked by those thinking its going to be this huge gamechanger is this.

ACORN paid its registration folks by the form, not by the hour. What you had here was folks sitting around with their friends filling out forms out of phone books to make money, not so much deliberate fraud. Will there be some? Of course, but if you think those 200,000 registrations will amount to much, you’re crazy.

ACORN et al, do not have the resources or money to get people to every polling place to vote for preregistered bad names again and again and again.

Will some fraud happen? Of course, it always does, but the idea its going to be any worse this time than in the past is just not justified.

Fauxbama’s in trouble and has been from day one, I was honestly way more worried in 2004 than I am in 2008 regarding the election, and in 2004 I was fairly comfortable. Today the only time I get worried is when I come to places like this and see the doom and gloomers.

Listen to me folks, the only way Fauxbama wins, is if the Republican Base gets dejected and stays home, that’s it, there is NO WAY Fauxbama can win without this happening.. so PLEASE stop this nonsense.

McCain is winning the independents by a very good margin, and as long as the Republican base turns out, McCain wins, its really no more difficult to understand than that. Stop all this doom and gloom dejections.


57 posted on 10/13/2008 12:08:21 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teethodore

English is not my forte :)


58 posted on 10/13/2008 12:12:14 PM PDT by jveritas (Use the nuclear option against Obama: Jeremiah Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
Yeah...it's an amazing thing to hear and witness.....isn't it?

Come on Bradley effect.......

59 posted on 10/13/2008 12:12:35 PM PDT by thingumbob (McGenius-Palin beats O'bomber-Hide'n (Remember, dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Of course we (Freepers) know that these are slanted polls. But do the undecided/swing voters? All they might read or hear are the main campaign headlines, including what the MSM states who is ahead in the polls.

I'm not convinced that it makes that much difference, especially for people who would at least be inclined (if not necessarily convinced) to vote Republican. People like that, and of course people like us FReepers, tend to view voting as a civic duty and a privilege to be used, even if we know that we've not got a chance of winning. This is why I always vote in my US House race from NC for whoever the Republican is, even though I know there's little chance of unseating David Price. Similarly, most of the people I'm talking about are less likely to vote "for the bandwagon" than are the typical Democrat voter.

Your typical Democrat voter usually tends towards the left (lower) side of the IQ distribution, and also tends to view voting less as a civic duty and more as a direct means of advancing his or herself (the two are actually related, see Murray and Herrnstein's discussion of this in the Bell Curve). As a result, unless they're really scared and convinced that they're going to lose big, many Dem voters tend to figure "hey, we're winning anywise, so I'll go __fill in blank__ instead". Ironically, this constant MSM tub-thumping about 0bama's lead in the polls may work to depress turnout among the Dems' traditional lower-IQ constituencies.

60 posted on 10/13/2008 12:12:42 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson