Posted on 10/15/2008 9:22:20 PM PDT by bcatwilly
Fox News did the same thing before the 2004 election. They moved “left” to compensate for all the criticism from the Democrats. It was well documented on FR by similar posts and opinions of Freepers.
Also, most of the behind the scenes people at Fox are liberals. They have an impact on coverage. The word is the Fox News Room erupted in applause when the initial polling results showed Kerry would win.
These people all live in New York or DC. They already assume Obama will win. In 2004, everyone at Fox seemed to be surprised Bush won.
Swipe!
Freegards.
I’m pissed at FOX too.
I’m surprised more people didn’t make the Ford/Obama connection. 2006 in TN was very similar to the US now. Ford signs and bumper stickers everywhere, and all the blacks and college kids were going to turn out for him, and the media was in the tank for him.
I thought he was probably going to do it, until the last few days when he fell behind. Due to the Bradley effect, or whatever, he lost by 4 points.
...We also need our soldiers to vote for McCain: there are thousands of absentee votes at risk!...
The counting of the absentee military vote has steadily been lessened since the 1988/1992 campaigns.
Witness the uproar regarding the lack of, the loss of absentee military votes in the 2000 presidential election.
Do you really believe that the absentee military votes are going to be fully accounted for in THIS presidential election?
is there kool aid to go along with that?
I was watching Hanity a little bit ago & they showed results of their text polling & it was like 86000 voters & JM was like 84 percent winner..
He doesn’t really “hate” her, he just thinks she was not a good choice. But according to his original analysis of how she could turn out to be a good choice, I think she’s met his qualifications. (see original article he wrote about Palin at this link.)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090402845.html
A democrat, a Hillary supporter to be exact Lynne De Rothschild, just gave the best explanation of Obamas 95% tax cut that I have heard on TV. On Greta’s show she calmly explained that 40% of workers will get a welfare check and raising taxes on 5% of Americans can’t pay for that. She is a very smart lady.
Now for the bad news. This lady is by far the best representative the Republicans have in explaining Obama tax cut scam and she is a Democrat.
Lord help us.
Unfortunately not. Bush and the Gop failed to defend americans’ vote abroad, especially in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan. This is big reason of concern, since these votes can be thousands and traditionally leans republican.
Republicans, philosophically, are devolving power and Socialists are amassing it. I think it is easier to get passionate about giving yourself more power. To make the case of “don’t rely on me, rely on yourself” is both more complex and seems to engender less passion. It is so much easier to be a socialist and say lets all give stuff to everybody...it makes them feel loved, popular, like the good guy. It is the difference between a tough love parent and a parent who wants to be friends with their teen ager.
The problem is, what Obama said was he would cut taxes for 95% of working Americans. That is a multi layered lie, and it doesn’t lend itself to a sound byte to refute it. What the articulate lady did was state the lie, then address the actual issue not actually stated in the lie but at the heart of why the lie is a lie. Sadly, American undecided voters aren’t following and are unable to follow the depth of layering in the Obama/Axelrod lies campaign, and the democrats depend upon that every time. I guess that’s why I like Sarah’s approach, to call a liar a liar, then go to what she and McCain will do to change things and try to fix the mess democrats and drunken sailor Republicans have created.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aKvYVKNGsc
Hannity defended papa Ford by agreeing that papa Ford said “ Tracker “ instead of “ Cracker “ . You be the judge .
I have searched everywhere for Hannity defending this racist , and it has mysteriously disappeared . If you find it , please post it here .
It exists , as I was shocked at Hannity’s bizarre defense of this racist comment .
Hannity has done B.O. a big favor by pounding the Wright issue into the ground to the point that it can never be used against B.O. again in an effective manner .... why Hannity , why ?
I just emailed them and told them that I am sure they cowardly backed off truth because they are frightened of Obama!
If Hannity knows what is good for him he will pack his bags and leave Fox! If he stays with Fox then by " association like Obama to Ayers"...he is guilty too!!
BOYCOTT ALL LIBERAL MEDIA... BOYCOTT ALL LIBERAL MEDIA!!!!!!
MARVELOUS GRAPHIC... should be on the back of ALL AUTOS for three weeks!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.