For those who want more than a selective, superficial Drudgeland ‘take’ on the voting trends, the 49-47 edge is based on the so-called “traditional” analysis of “likely” voters. The more reliable “expanded” analysis shows a much larger edge (51-45) and the standard poll, based on registered voters, shows an even greater edge (50-43) for Obama, with an across-the-board range of 4-7% undecided voters. All rationalizations beyond these findings are of little significance until the state-by-state, electoral college estimates become available.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2108196/posts
The more reliable analysis? Really? Okay, please compare how this more "reliable" method has compared to the traditional method in past elections?
-CRICKETS CHIRPING-