Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Is Just Powell's Latest Mistake
http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/obama-is-just-powells-latest-mistake/ ^ | Oct. 20, '08 | Claudia Rosett

Posted on 10/22/2008 2:58:38 PM PDT by T.L.Sink

Having watched Colin Powell's enraptured endorsement of Obama on Meet the Press, I got to thinking about Powell's track record of judgment calls. That took me back to Powell's performance during the debate at the UN over the Iraq war - not his presentation on WMD (which relected available intelligence at the time)- but his strange omission of something highly germane. As Secretary of State, Powell was best placed to know of the UN's corrupt Oil-for-Food scandal. He had privileged access to details and documentation. He never brought it into the publc debate, and State refused to release it to the public. Powell failed to alert Bush and the public to the corrupting influence of billions worth of Oil-for-Food dollars on the UN debate itself. This was a cover-up that helped Saddam, hurt America, and demonstrated Powell's lousy judgemnt. In addition: Powell claims to be friends with McCain but didn't give him so much as a phone call before endorsing Obama. That's underhanded. In the 1991 Gulf War, Powell was one behind the influences to stop the war before Saddam was completely defeated. That, plus America's abandonment of the Iraqis who rebelled after the war were serious mistakes, with deadly results for many. During the tempest over the "outing" of Valerie Plame, Powell and his deputy at State, Richard Armitage, kept silent and let the White House take the heat.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
(cont'd.) In 2005, Powell called his own 2003 speech at the UN, making the case for invading Iraq, a "blot" on his record. So he would have preferred to leave Saddam in power, to be succeeded by his sadistic sons, running a regime that cut off tongues, ripped out nails with pliers, and butchered its own people? Obama argues that the Bush administration and its Iraq war, in which Powell played a major role, was dishonorable. Powell left office on a sour note and is now supporting Obama. Just how much honor can a man afford to lend to the idea that that he was dishonorable, before he is actually dishonoring himself in the process?
1 posted on 10/22/2008 2:58:38 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Powell is irrelevant.


2 posted on 10/22/2008 2:59:56 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Why has no one else noted that 0bama wanting to put Powell — a former Bushie — in his administration is not ‘CHANGE’?
Powell is the guy who advised Bush on Saddam’s WMDs and even went to the UN to sell the American people and the rest of the world on the Iraq war. And 0bama has been taking advice from this guy now.

I can hardly tell 0bama apart from Bush these days...


3 posted on 10/22/2008 3:00:02 PM PDT by counterpunch (It's the SOCIALISM, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
Perhaps Powell could invoke this scenario

Foreign Policy: President Obama’s Past Will Haunt American Security?

American people, is it really worth choosing Obama as the first African American candidate?

Imagine, Bin Laden & Achmedinajad if ever questioned by President Obama about their terrorist activities, or developing nuclear weapons program? The two most hated man by most Americans will smile, twist their lips, laugh slyly as they will know they have Obama where they really want him. In a defensive position on international scene.

Read more at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112132/posts

Fight for us Sarah, fight for us



4 posted on 10/22/2008 3:00:25 PM PDT by indianyogi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

One is tempted to say to Gen. Powell what Gen. Sherman said to Gen. Grant: “For the country’s sake and your own - get out of politics!”


5 posted on 10/22/2008 3:01:15 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

National Review’s Jim Geraghty’s “Obi Wan” the old hand in GOP politics that knows elections cold thinks Obama played his “Powell card” a week early because Obama’s internal polls showed him sinking.

Obi Wan suggested that Powell was the last card Obama had to play to prop up his (bogus) poll numbers.

According to Obi Wan - he thinks Obama was waiting until the last week to use Powell as a clincher. Obama played it to halt a slide in real internal polls.

Obi Wan thinks when Obama’s poll numbers start to fall - they may fall pretty fast.

Hawaii is obviously some other ruse.


6 posted on 10/22/2008 3:14:37 PM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Both Bush, and Obama have the same notion, both want to put the USA under the UN flag, and have a one world leader, and a One World Government. Colin Powell is one of those too, and wants the same end to come to the USA. So what we have now is not really the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, but the Americans against the Globalists. Most of the news organizations are globalists too. Obama really does want to be the leader of this One World Government. Now are things more clear?
7 posted on 10/22/2008 3:15:37 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Both Bush, and Obama have the same notion, both want to put the USA under the UN flag, and have a one world leader, and a One World Government. Colin Powell is one of those too, and wants the same end to come to the USA. So what we have now is not really the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, but the Americans against the Globalists. Most of the news organizations are globalists too. Obama really does want to be the leader of this One World Government. Now are things more clear?
8 posted on 10/22/2008 3:16:33 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
Mickey Kaus believes the Powell endorsemnt has a short half-life.

"Boil across You Tube"? It's not even boiling across HuffPo. It's not, you know, compelling viewing. Maybe if you put some cats in it. .... My guess isn't that the Powell endorsement will fade quickly. My guess is it's already faded. ...

I agree. The reason: Powell presented an weak analysis for his transformation, enabled only because Brokaw bastardized the MTP format by allowing Powell to speak uninterrupted for several minutes.

For example, a simple question to Powell about Biden's opposition to ejecting Saddam from Kuwait would have rebutted Powell's "concerns" about Palin.

9 posted on 10/22/2008 3:19:55 PM PDT by afortiori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
If Powell tells 0bama that Iran has nukes will 0bama believe him?

Colin lied, people died, 0bama has him at his side.

10 posted on 10/22/2008 3:22:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Did I really hear some answering to the charge that Obama is a Muslim, “Well what is wrong with a President being a Muslim?”
Was that a statement by powell? I cannot believe I heard that!!! Can that be confirmed?


11 posted on 10/22/2008 5:19:38 PM PDT by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward--Anonymous))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LetMarch
You heard it.

Speaking at NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, Powell was more critical of the Republican Party and John McCain’s campaign than of the candidate himself. “I’m also troubled by not what Sen. McCain says but what members of the party say, and it is permitted to be said. Such things as ‘Well you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.’ Well the correct answer is ‘He is not a Muslim, he’s a Christian, he’s always been a Christian.’ But the really right answer is ‘What if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country?’ The answer is ‘No. That’s not America.’


1 March 2003
Powell Says U.S. Opposes Weapons Proliferation, Not Islam

"We respect the Muslim faith and would do nothing to dishonor Islam in any way," he said.

12 posted on 10/22/2008 7:29:05 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: indianyogi

Thanks for the YouTube reference. Good post.


13 posted on 10/22/2008 7:31:19 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afortiori

I posted an article recently that stated (in nicer terms) this was a case of one black supporting another. In the past couple days Rush, too, has adduced evidence that Powell has played the race (not racism ) card. This fits neatly into the Obama campaign strategy.


14 posted on 10/22/2008 7:50:31 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Wasn’t it Obama who described Iran as “small and not very powerful country”?


15 posted on 10/22/2008 7:54:05 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LetMarch

I don’t know who may have said that. But I do remember in the primary debates Hillary was asked if she thought Obama was a Muslim and she replied, “Not that I know of.” A pretty funny answer it retrospect!


16 posted on 10/22/2008 7:59:46 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

And he said he would invade Pakistan unilaterally and without UN approval.


17 posted on 10/22/2008 8:18:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Right! That’s the guy who would arbitaraily invade an independent sovereign state and U.S. ally - but insist on “no preconditions” before negotiating with, or doing any harm to, the rogue terrorist state of Iran which will soon have a nuclear arsenal! Go figure.


18 posted on 10/22/2008 8:31:57 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

What could go wrong? Just because Pakistan has nukes. Just because they’re in a nuclear standoff with another ally of ours. India.


19 posted on 10/22/2008 8:43:18 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Powell has always been anti-gun rights. Probably why he has never been on a Republican ticket.


20 posted on 10/23/2008 4:38:02 AM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson