Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove: Obama won't get any undecided voters?
Fox news | 10-20-08 | Karl Rove

Posted on 10/27/2008 9:00:13 AM PDT by Brookhaven

Karl Rove made a statement in passing on Fox news got passed over, but as time has passed I've decided it is the unspoken key to this election. Paraphrased:

Whatever Sen. Obama is polling on election day is the percentage of votes he will receive. That's what happened in the primaries. It's important for him to be over 50%. In those states where he is under 50% he will be in trouble.

It took a while for it to sink it, but what he is saying is that the undecided vote will go almost 100% against Obama. When you look at polls, there is a tendency to assume the undecided vote will split for the candidates along the same lines as the decided voters (or that each candiate will get a big portion of the undecided vote. Rove deosn't seem to believe that to be true.

This does seem to make sense to me from one standpoint. Obama by rights should be running away with this race. He's not. The reason seems to be that Obama can't seal the deal with undecided voters. Their undecided because they are unsure about Obama (as opposed to liking both candidates but can't make up their mind about which one to vote for.)

Does anyone have any numbers on what Obama polled in the primary vs. actual votes to backup/disprove Rove's statement?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; obama; polls; rove; undecidedvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Brookhaven

Anecdotal evidence suggests that it’s quite possible. The “undecided” block has, in some previous elections, broken overwhelmingly toward one candidate, typically the one that is either underfunded or at a disadvantage in media perception (or both), as the “favorite” candidate fails to “seal the deal” prior to election day.

However, there’s no guarantee that that will happen in any given election; it’s just interesting to note that such a thing has happened before.


21 posted on 10/27/2008 9:16:15 AM PDT by kevkrom (If Obama promises to tax your neighbor to give to you, what's he promising your neighbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
I think 95% or more will go to McCain. I have no historical stats or anything to back me up, just my hunch.

When I've been reweighting polls based on saner party ID numbers (reweighting to R/D/I of 36/38/26), I've also put in a check to see what would happen if the undecideds broke 2:1 for McCain -- in most cases, it puts McCain clearly in the lead after the party ID question is settled.

22 posted on 10/27/2008 9:18:29 AM PDT by kevkrom (If Obama promises to tax your neighbor to give to you, what's he promising your neighbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

That’s the way it happened in the primaries. If polling showed O-48% and H-46% the final would be O-48% and H-52%. She’d pick up all the so-called undecideds.


23 posted on 10/27/2008 9:20:58 AM PDT by pgkdan ("White folks greed runs a world in need," Jeremiah Wright as quoted by Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Had an O'bomber brownshirt from "Progressive" something or other came to my door on Sunday (I live in Northest Ohio) asking for me and he wanted to convince me to vote for O'bomber....I told him I couldn't wait to vote for O'bomber on Nov. 4.....He went away happy.

Of course that was a lie and I'm going to vote for McCain...but I wonder how many others in my area did exactly the same thing......I figured why should I shatter this idiots worldview before the election...when I can hope to enjoy it instead on election night!

Priceless......

24 posted on 10/27/2008 9:21:46 AM PDT by thingumbob (McGenius-Palin beats O'bomber-Hide'n (Remember, dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Photobucket
25 posted on 10/27/2008 9:21:52 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaRep

Take the IBD/TIPP poll and look at those beautiful undecideds! We only need 7 in 10 to win. Also check out the way the union household vote is breaking. I really think the 46% Obama is getting on that poll is all he is going to get. How sweet is next Tuesday night/Wednesday going to be? 52% McCain, 46% Obama, 1% Barr, 1% Nader.


26 posted on 10/27/2008 9:22:06 AM PDT by sharkshooting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Look how Obama “finished up” against Hillary. If it weren’t for the Super Delegates and ACORN fraud, Hillary would have mopped the floor with him.

But don’t count out the corruption and fraud the Democrats are committing under our noses. And getting away with it Scott-free.


27 posted on 10/27/2008 9:22:50 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Whatever Sen. Obama is polling on election day is the percentage of votes he will receive. That's what happened in the primaries. It's important for him to be over 50%. In those states where he is under 50% he will be in trouble.

I have heard Dick Morris (ok, ok, I know...) explain this dynamic as well. When Morris was working for Clinton on his re-election for governor in Arkansas, he got polling data two days before the election that Clinton has slipped below 50%. It was the middle of the night. He got over to the governors mansion, dragged Clinton out of bed and the two went over to the recording studio and cut ads in the middle of the night to address the issue. The ads worked and Slick was reelected.

The 12% undecided number is huge. If Obama goes into the election with it, he loses.

28 posted on 10/27/2008 9:25:28 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach

The other thing to consider, for undecideds, is that if “the one” wins, and has a solidly democratic house and senate, he gets every socialist wish granted immediately. However, if McCain is the one holding the veto pen, there is a good system of checks and balances to ensure nothing extreme happens to our culture and tax structure.


29 posted on 10/27/2008 9:26:06 AM PDT by VRWCer (Sarah Palin - the embodiment of the spirit and true grit upon which this great country was founded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheGeezer
A national average of 49% may not translate into an electoral college victory.

Agreed, mathematically there are all kinds of prospective numerical outcomes of electoral vs. popular vote, but my prediction still stands. If Obama gets 49% of the popular vote he will win.

30 posted on 10/27/2008 9:26:38 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Reagan is back, and this time he's a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sharkshooting

I could be those “undecided” are Hillary voters, still angry with the DNC for throwing them under the bus.

We shall see, but this is the most U’s we have seen in the history of elections. Is it not?


31 posted on 10/27/2008 9:27:43 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

If Rove is right about just the states with more than 50% going to Obama and RCP averages are correct, Obama will end up with 306 EVs.


32 posted on 10/27/2008 9:29:15 AM PDT by Rumierules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
How many are not undecided but don’t want to say who they are voting for?

this describes one of my sisters... she is a Dem and has always voted Dem... but she doesn't like Obama... does not want to vote for him... but to actually come out and say she is going to vote for McCain is just too much for her... she's asking herself, "can i actually vote for a Republican?" i believe she will vote for McCain... her husband, who is a Dem who supported Hillary, has already come out to say he is voting for McCain... this is why i think my sister will actually vote for McCain...

33 posted on 10/27/2008 9:32:31 AM PDT by latina4dubya ( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

I saw a comment this morning re: undecideds. It made some sense. It said that given the mediawhoring for Obama these last few months while at the same time they’ve been ridiculing and destoying McCain and Palin, anyone that would buy into the Obama claptrap has already done so, and would say so when polled. Which is what Rove says. Obie will get what he polls now.


34 posted on 10/27/2008 9:32:55 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWCer
The other thing to consider, for undecideds, is that if “the one” wins, and has a solidly democratic house and senate, he gets every socialist wish granted immediately. However, if McCain is the one holding the veto pen, there is a good system of checks and balances to ensure nothing extreme happens to our culture and tax structure.

Divided government is a very good argument for McCain. Of note is that Obama hasn't really put forward the argument for why he, with his party in control of Congress, will be a good thing for the country. It's clear that his campaign wants to gloss over that rather than advocate for it. Why?


35 posted on 10/27/2008 9:34:17 AM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
If Obama gets 48 or 49% of the vote he will win.

Gore got 51% and lost so it's possible.

36 posted on 10/27/2008 9:39:16 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rumierules

In my opinion, forget the RCP averages. If you have a bunch of polls with all kinds of varying MOE’s and weights, the average of them would be incredibly unreliable. Find a poll with a representative party weight.

For instance, if the dems outnumber the reps in a state by 2%, a poll that gives an 8% dem advantage is insane. I do not see any rational state poll in the battlegrounds that have Obama over 48% except in NM and PA. In fact FL with a +6% poll still has him at 47%.

The RCP average of polls is really screwy in my opinion and will only serve to skew the results based on some bizzarly outlandish polls.


37 posted on 10/27/2008 9:39:45 AM PDT by sharkshooting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sharkshooting

The RCP average should be only based on the results of professional pollsters like Rasmussen, Battleground, IBD/TIPP,and Gallup. MSM polls and until recently Zogby are all propaganda.


38 posted on 10/27/2008 9:44:40 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach
People know McCain, not Obama.

Know McCain.

No Obama.

39 posted on 10/27/2008 9:47:16 AM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sharkshooting

I am not a real Poll Junkie YET !!
But my Qusetion is thisWhat can Obama say or do in the Last week of the campaign that he hasn’t already said or done in the LONG Primary battle with HRC, The General Election & the Carpet Bombing Ads, The Pornographic Lovefest from The Drive By Media!! what can he do top make these “UNDECIDEDS” vote for him ??? Nothing !!! they will break OVERWHELMINGLY for McCain


40 posted on 10/27/2008 9:48:44 AM PDT by PaRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson