Posted on 11/07/2008 8:20:19 AM PST by AndrewWalden
A fairly impressive internet industry has sprung up claiming that Obama was born in either Kenya or Indonesia. This is nonsense which distracts from the broadly unexplored story of Obama’s upbringing. This kind of nonsense has emerged because the McCain campaign chose not to raise the many questions about Barack Obama’s numerous hard-left alliances. Barack Obama was born in Hawai`i, August 4, 1961 at Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu.
Obama’s birth certificate posted online is exactly the same birth certificate everybody in Hawai`i gets from the State Department of Health. It is not forged. There is nothing unusual about the design or the texture. In addition to the birth certificate, the August 13, 1961 Honolulu Advertiser also carries an announcement of Obama’s birth. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin also carries the same announcement. Both papers require submission of a copy of the birth certificate to print a birth announcement.
By refusing media requests for a look at the actual paper birth certificate, Obama’s campaign gave sly backhanded assistance to the forgery hype.
(Excerpt) Read more at hawaiifreepress.com ...
Nicde try, but why would Kenya even have documents on Obama for Jerome Corsi to be prevented from looking at? Your youth apparently guides your willing koolaid consumption.
If the Dept. of Health redacted the file number, FactCheck’s photos were taken March.
So FactCheck has a document with a file number showing. Therefore, the Dept. of Health didn’t redact the number.
Interesting. I wonder why the state of Hawaii would go to the expense of having someone sit and re-type all of the information from the original BC to a new form, instead of simply photo-copying the original?
I just had to obtain a new copy of my original BC from California, and they simply photo-copied the original onto a new official document form, which bears all of the necessary seals, current date, and signatures.
Barry's purported copy seems to have been built from the ground up. Why?
I don’t care how low the resolution is. The signature would not poof.
The document on the campaign site was an admitted forgery. So where did FactCheck get their document from?
Obama’s sister has a Hawaiian Certificate of live Birth as well even though she wasn’t born in Hawaii.
The early forgeries were tests to see what would be detected and what they could get away with, as I have already stated there is still a major problem with the border that cannot be explained away no matter how detailed the Annenberg pictures are.
That screw up has be replicated in each of the successive forgeries and does not appear on any comparable Certificates of Live Birth from other sources and of the same vintage or edition of the revision of the document.
This means that Obama’s document is unique unto itself because of it’s misaligned border. Since that imperfection only appears in Obama’s various versins of his COLB and no one else’s it is our best proof that a flawed forgery was created, and refined to suit the needs of the discussion into the flaws of the forgery.
Sure, I know that. It's the document we're discussing.
What I want to know is why the state of Hawaii didn't just photo-copy his original BC onto a new official form, like the one I just received from the state of California.
You mean to tell me that the state had someone sit and re-type all of the information off the original onto a new form? I'm not buying that.
It would be interesting to see any recent Hawaiian BC copies, to see if there's a difference between them, and Barry's.
>>>Right, could have been a different copy, it was almost certainly a scan (not a higher res photo), and was always low res and hard to analyze.
A different copy? This is news. Link?
Wrong.
You don't read much, do you?
If they had scanned the document shown on Fact Check, the embossed seal they show would have been evident on the scan. Something stinks, besides just the March date stamps on the pics.
Ping.
And the signature and the fold.
And here is the original upload in their server test file.
http://www.fightthesmears.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/images/28.jpg
That is how they preview before they publish. I wonder what turned it from green to yellow?
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
The forgery shows the father’s RACE as AFRICAN.
not, as you wrote, African-American.
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
Don’t worry, they probably have one that says that too. They have them in a variety of colors.
Google Image Result for http://www.factcheck.org/demos/factcheck/imagefiles/Image/Ask%20FactCheck%20Images/Birth%20Certificate/announcementclose-up.jpg
imgurl=http://www.factcheck.org/demos/factcheck/imagefiles/Image/Ask%2520FactCheck%2520Images/Birth%2520Certificate/announcementclose-up.jpg
Google uses frames to display image results. You can view the http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1197813.page;jsessionid=B69323924E844C04BF328FA95E2C8B1F referring page
Until a scrupulously analyzed birth certificate is submitted, all other attempts to fool us are hereby declared utterly rejected.
No BC submitted for analysis = NOT a legitimate “president”.
Don’t know how we can make this any clearer to the various interests trying.
And FactCheck is using the announcement from TxDarlings site on their proof page:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
When they are the ones that generated it.
THEY sent it to her.
What a bunch of typical commie propaganda artists.
Ok, enough of this. It is giving me a headache. Ciao.
yes, that’s why I have bothered to write this. This lunacy has spread beyond the usual 9-11 troother conspiracy nuts.
It would be a shame if Family Security Matters ends up looking like “Loose Change”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.