Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's a little old, but I thought Newt's explanation should be posted.
1 posted on 11/16/2008 3:05:25 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: neverdem
It's not the “being part of the debate” that bothers me...it's being on the same side “in the debate” as the Marxists that does......
2 posted on 11/16/2008 3:08:56 PM PST by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Gingrich Explains Why He Did Global Warming Ad With Pelosi

This ad is the reason Gingrich should never run for President. He is not true to Conservative values. I won't vote for him.

3 posted on 11/16/2008 3:09:13 PM PST by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Green Conservatism”


4 posted on 11/16/2008 3:09:13 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Gingrich: Our sun controls the climate, not humans watch!
5 posted on 11/16/2008 3:10:07 PM PST by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Why don’t the conservatives formulate an energy policy based upon the facts not speculation by environmental anarchists? I stand in awe as we let the other take center stage on all the issues putting us in the response mode.


6 posted on 11/16/2008 3:10:45 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Newt's explanation is akin to explaining away THIS photo:


7 posted on 11/16/2008 3:12:28 PM PST by AC-130 Gunship (Odinga-Hussein 0bama: Ushering in a new Reich of hell of thru "diversity" and Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Anyone doing an ad with Pelosi can have no explanation that would satisfy me — no Conservative should give that leftist any credibility.


8 posted on 11/16/2008 3:12:29 PM PST by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER LetsGetThisRight.com RED STATE Oklahoma Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Well, that explanation makes sense, but you’d never guess that’s what he believes by watching that ad. That ad makes him look like he’s just another politician trying to be everything to everybody. He’d be better off finding another way to express his concerns over the environment. IMO

Dear Newt: mission NOT accomplished.


9 posted on 11/16/2008 3:12:44 PM PST by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
With my Real Estate Pac, the leaders at state level endorsed a democratic governor. We conservatives were hopping mad, I talked to one of the Republican trustees and he said, "It's Better to be at the table than on the menu".

Newt seems to be saying the same thing.

10 posted on 11/16/2008 3:12:47 PM PST by thirst4truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Didn’t he “debate” Bore on this and agree with everything Bore said?


11 posted on 11/16/2008 3:13:07 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (((The hell with buckling the seat belts - Load the guns!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

BS. Jaw-jaw has gotten us where we are-are. It gives their premises the aura of legitimacy.


13 posted on 11/16/2008 3:14:05 PM PST by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Prizes?!?!?


15 posted on 11/16/2008 3:16:05 PM PST by Osage Orange (Victims that fight back live longer.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Just asking...is “green conservatism” related to or comparable to “compassionate conservatism?” I thought by now that conservatives had learned to be suspicous of anyone who feels the need to add some modifier to conservatism to make it more acceptable to lefties.


16 posted on 11/16/2008 3:16:25 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I don't think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don't think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.

Fuzzy thinking.

17 posted on 11/16/2008 3:17:04 PM PST by RightWhale (Exxon Suxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I didn’t see any debate!


18 posted on 11/16/2008 3:18:42 PM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

But Newt, you caved on the key debate i.e. whether or not global warming is occurring and what is the cause.....you bought into anthropogenic global warming when the evidence indicates that global warming is caused by natural forces. This is not conservatism it is simply moonbattery. And profiting off the sale of a solution(s) to a non-existent problem is simply wrong and is on par with selling band instruments and uniforms to parents to keep their kid from playing pool. Snake oil snake oil snake oil. You should be ashamed of yourself Newt for doing the idiotic ad with comrade Nancy and even more ashamed of yourself for this ridiculous explanation.


19 posted on 11/16/2008 3:18:48 PM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I don’t disagree with what newt said but it doesn’t explain doing ads WITH the dems. Why not separate ads showing the contrast.

How about conservatives stating they are for reducing pollutants harmful to humans and stating that CO2 is not one if them as technology improvements allow it? These idiots are focusing on the wrong compounds and wanting to waste precious resources reducing CO2 which nature loves.


20 posted on 11/16/2008 3:19:22 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Don’t plan on reading it, there is not enough wild turkey made to get me drunk enough to make a commercial with that Nancy. So newt had a brain stroke, I hope he gets well and does ok in his remaining retirement years.


21 posted on 11/16/2008 3:20:25 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I don’t think it was a debate Newt.


22 posted on 11/16/2008 3:21:10 PM PST by rjones42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Good idea, Newt...but the wrong approach. Doing ANYTHING with Pelosi is a slap in the face to a conservative simply because what she stands for is anathema to conservative principles. If you want to get your message out, doing it with Pelosi is the wrong way to do it because virtually everyone will see it a tacit approval of Pelosi’s message. I rarely disagree with you, Newt, but this time you're wrong.
23 posted on 11/16/2008 3:22:05 PM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson