Posted on 11/17/2008 11:46:23 AM PST by mgist
Yes, I think that the Dems would say “so what”.
He said it because he was not reading off the teleprompter?
This attorney has —— of steel. The fact of the matter is that O should have to present this information. I have to provide all school records, original birth certificates, baptismal certificates, and medical vaccination records for my children to attend school. You would think that a position for the leader of the United States of America would at least require the basic disclosures”
I tried to buy generic Sudafed at Wal-Mart last Wednesday.
I had to go to the pharmacists window. Hand over my drivers license, answer more questions, wait for them to search the system to see how much of similar items I might be buying (because of the meth problems) and then I had to explain why I was NOT in the system she was searching.
Time??? 27 minutes of giving over information just to buy generic sinus tablets.
Spme one has to convince me that NObama should NOT have to provide his valid birth certificate. Lord knows how much time it will take when I have to refill my “allotment”.
I just had to provide an original BC and SS card to get my drivers license renewed in Oregon. Photocopies were not acceptable as proof of citizenship.”
Same here in N Nevada when I moved here in 2005.
Whether he has a birth certificate or not is not is dispute, the State of Hawaii says he does and has issued an abstract.
The question is what is on the original document and why is Obama trying to keep it hidden. There are endless reasons why he would want to do so but given the current circumstances all we can do is speculate.
>What if this can be used by the left as a pretext to start nullifying the Constitution.
That’s when the “domestic” part of every armed-forces person’s oath kicks it. At that time in point, the military is free to SHRED the government... it probably won’t happen because of ‘politics’, but I don’t see HOW someone could appease their consciousness to allow their word to be so useless. (Though there are, obviously, people whose word means less than nothing.)
Got me. Maybe he did not understand the full import of what BO said.
Not likely IMHO that Alan did not understand the significance of O saying he was not a natural born citizen. More likely he was waiting to see what happened in the Bird case and filed only after it stalled. Or perhaps he thought O would lose and only was motivated to file when he won and the Bird case’s “No standing” dismissal made it manditory that he file. No way would I believe that Alan would not have known the significance of what he said.
There are 17 lawsuits in 12 states concerning President Elect Barack Obama’s eligibility to the Presidency.
Obama and the DNC have hired 3 lawfirms to defend them against the lawsuits.
Makes you wonder what exactly is worth hiding on that document in Hawaii, doesn’t it?
Is it safe to presume you are referring to debates between Obama and Keyes prior to the US Senate election?
I found three transcripts:
Illinois Radio Network, October 12, 2004
League of Women Voters, October 21, 2004
WTTW and the City Club of Chicago, October 26, 2004
There's nothing like that in any of those. Maybe you can find more in one of the other transcripts:
Now stop dissin' mah cultural heritage!!!!!
We don't need drivers licenses either.
Esp Mejicanos. We just drive. Its EVERY persons right, just like health care.
( Sarc. off)
Being a Democrap means never having to answer troubling questions.
Philip Berg supposedly possesses Stanley Anne Dunham’s medical records (he couldn’t get Senator Obama’s, just his mother’s records).
According to those records she never gave birth in the United States. Her son Barack was born 1961 in Mombasa, Kenya; her daughter Maya was born 1970 in Djakarta, Indonesia. Both births were registered in Hawaii using a document called “Certification of Live Birth”, a document discontinued after 1972.
A Hawaiian birth certificate (proper) is called “Certificate of Live Birth”.
Notice the difference?
Update ping.
Ah, of course.
Before or after he is inaugurated?
After it may require Impeachment and Removal from Office; unless he resigns (I doubt that he would).
This is an unanswered question because it has never come up in history to date.
Abso”friggin”lutely! Didn’t know about these lawsuits.
The riots will seem to never end. Race relations will be set back by decades. And the far left will drool at the chaos.
The dems and the MSM will pronounce that Jesus did not have one either, so what’s the big deal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.