[unspun]

More constitutional analysis that indicates:

By Article 2, strict constructionism, considering original intent and the most applicable aspects of related legal, historical, and philosophicl context requires that Barack H. Obama II is not allowed to be United States President

All over again, we will see whether we have a SCOTUS with a constitutional backbone.

Happy Thanksgiving

[4integrity]

unspun, thank you. Today, we give thanks for our great country and we pray that it will remain the country that our founders intended.

Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family!

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I wish I could believe that the SCOTUS would do the right thing, but even before BO packs the court, there are cases like Plyler v. Doe 1981:

The Court reasoned that illegal aliens and their children, though not citizens of the United States or Texas, are people "in any ordinary sense of the term" and, therefore, are afforded Fourteenth Amendment protections. Since the state law severely disadvantaged the children of illegal aliens, by denying them the right to an education, and because Texas could not prove that the regulation was needed to serve a "compelling state interest," the Court struck down the law.