Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: cycle of discernment
The Supreme Court weighs-in with its official opinion on Presidential qualifications...


48 posted on 12/08/2008 7:28:10 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
There is no dissent, no group of Justices who say this should have been considered, and giving their reasons. The lack of a dissent is, in my experience with the Court, a green light for all courts at the federal and state level, to throw out all remaining Obama-citizenship cases, without factual hearings.

The only thing left is a protest on the record in the Joint Session of Congress when it officially counts the Electoral College votes. The protest will not get a hearing and will go nowhere, but that's all that's left.

John / Billybob

56 posted on 12/08/2008 7:28:58 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Larest book: www.AmericasOwnersManual.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

It is not over. We can start a letter writing (not just emails) to our Senators and Representatives and let them know that any law they vote for which is signed by the Illegitimate President is not valid.

All we need is for a couple of good Senators and Congresscritters to stand up in the Legislature and demand to see Barry’s vault birth certificate. And I think there are a few there who will be willing to do so.

Especially since the Islamic call for Barry to “reconnect” to his Muslim roots.

Is it worth a few bucks in postage stamps? http://www.usa.gov


70 posted on 12/08/2008 7:31:09 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (The USofA, Conservative, Traditional, Constitutional , , , now it's up to the SCOTUSofA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

The Keyes case was (and still is) the best case


73 posted on 12/08/2008 7:31:26 AM PST by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
The social contract, what tattered remains of it were left between the judiciary and the citizenry under the Constitution, is now officially null and void. We are now living behind enemy lines in a coup-led oligarchy.

Time to Resist.

77 posted on 12/08/2008 7:32:33 AM PST by TonyStark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

I posted the news a few minutes b4 you did - the post was there ... then it was gone, along with 2 replies ...

What the hell happened to my Post???


84 posted on 12/08/2008 7:33:50 AM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Someone tell me again why we should worry if Obammie selects the next 2-3 SC justices????

Look at how well the SCOTUS has done for us after 20 years of a GOP White House. (heavy sarcasm here)

We are no closer to overturning Roe vs. Wade than we were 10-20-30 years ago.

And now this?????

86 posted on 12/08/2008 7:34:56 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Without reading more ... Cr*p! ;-(


89 posted on 12/08/2008 7:35:59 AM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here. ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Anyone got any evidence that he wasn’t born in Hawaii? If not, you’ll have a hard time convincing anyone that this isn’t a complete waste of time.


96 posted on 12/08/2008 7:37:25 AM PST by popdonnelly (Don't lose sight of your conservative principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

No surprise... I didn’t look for this to go anywhere. I don’t know that I want SCOTUS deciding elections but I do know that Obama has something to hide and I am afraid it’s going to bite us in the hind quarters in a very bad way some day.

What do we say when members of our military are put on trial somewhere for following the orders of an improperly elected Commander in Chief?

Or that some treaty or agreement is void because The One signed it?

Thisis not going to go away and I am afraid it going to lead to a president Arnold... or worse.


99 posted on 12/08/2008 7:37:52 AM PST by Taichi (Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

If the Court is going to be really uptight, as they often are, they might be waiting for the Electoral College to actually meet and vote for BO, and then could hear an appeal that contains the facts.

Well, we can only hope...


104 posted on 12/08/2008 7:39:44 AM PST by Ex-Democrat Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

This means it couldn’t even get four votes. THAT is the disappointing thing.

Which of the four - Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito - wouldn’t vote for this to be heard??????

We’re losing the Republic, one vote at a time.


111 posted on 12/08/2008 7:41:22 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

116 posted on 12/08/2008 7:42:01 AM PST by America2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

I will now refer to Øbama as “his illigitimacy.” This time, it’s an apt description of the occupant of the HW.


117 posted on 12/08/2008 7:42:54 AM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
I knew this issue would never gain traction. The liberals have the court system sewed up. We might as well get use to that. If Obama can name three Supremes in his two terms, then the left rules the Supreme Court for decades. Yes, sorry, but I see him winning again because we have no one to run against him with the party so split up at this point. I think Palin should wait 8 years because no need to waste her in 2012 unless we are solid for a win. This is not going to be something that can be beaten back and corrected in 4 or maybe even 8 years. The republican party is split up into two, three, four different factions. The dimocrats are one party, with one mind set, liberalism. We have to fight against several factions on our side. You know all them as well as I.

We may not get the White House back for many years. The republicans had the game won, had the ball in their hands, were driving down the field, and the quarterback, George W. Bush, fumbled his hand off and the liberals recovered and drove for the winning TD. The republicans in congress fumbled that handoff and the QB just stood there and asked the nose tackle for the liberals, 385 pound Ted Kennedy to help him sign an education bill and Ted said sure. So, the republicans have lost the game, lost the season, and probably lost for several seasons. I would call the republicans, the Oakland Raiders of politics. The Raiders are a disfunctional team and so are the republicans. We are in deep Obama and I see very little chance too get out of it. They are way behind in the House, and now way behind in the Senate in seats. Went from a majority in both to the bottom of the pit. Now I know how the Russian peasants felt standing there looking across the wire at freedom in the west.

123 posted on 12/08/2008 7:43:53 AM PST by RetiredArmy (NOTE TO REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS: PLAY THE CONSERVATIVE CARD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment; All

Remember that this case was not about the BC.

However, I am starting to realize that the SCOTUS doesn’t want to act as an investigative body. Therefore, the whole issue of a BC becomes moot because no one can compel Obama to produce a BC except a court; which none will do....even the SCOTUS. So, without compeling evidence (a BC) the SCOTUS won’t hear the case....but it takes the SCOTUS or other court to force the release of the BC to provide compleing evidence.

If ever there was a Catch 22 this is it!!!!!


124 posted on 12/08/2008 7:43:59 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment


How long do we have to wear the helmet?
127 posted on 12/08/2008 7:45:00 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

It’s not entirely surprising. The Court has been pretty much ignoring the Constitution until the days of Earl Warren.

But I did have some hope that FOUR justices would vote to look at it, which would have been enough to put it on the docket. Evidently not even that many. Or maybe Stevens told them he would never vote against Obama, so they decided it was pointless to stir things up without a majority on board.

Whatever you think of abortion, Roe v. Wade was one of a number of important SCOTUS decisions that were made up of whole cloth, without the faintest shadow or penumbra of support from the Constitution. So they’re getting in the habit of ignoring their oaths and ignoring the Constitution they swore to uphold.


130 posted on 12/08/2008 7:45:35 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

I guess the Terminator can be the POTUS now since Obama’s refusal to prove via his vault copy BC that he is natural born now give precedent for any future Terminator to run...

hmmm maybe the Rats will run an OSAMA illegitimate child born in 1980 somewhere outside the U.S. and then brought to Hawaii by his American citizen mother who was impregnated by UBL in an Afghani cave while prepping for the 1993 and subsequent 911 attacks on the wtc.

Its just so ludacris right?


135 posted on 12/08/2008 7:46:39 AM PST by tomnbeverly (Doing time on the Obama Plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...

Ping.


140 posted on 12/08/2008 7:48:17 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson