Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blagojevich: Who Is Advisor B?
NationalReview ^ | 12/11/2008 | Byron York

Posted on 12/11/2008 7:08:34 AM PST by JRochelle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
This scandal will be fun. The cesspool that is Chicago will provide a lot of entertainment in the next 4 years.

I have no doubt that Obama and Rahm knew what BLogo wanted and they were ok with that.

The Messiah will fall and be exposed for the dark angel he is.

1 posted on 12/11/2008 7:08:34 AM PST by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

They have more to worry about with Rezko than Blago............


2 posted on 12/11/2008 7:11:14 AM PST by Red Badger (Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Let’s see if Blagojevich is more loyal to the Democrat party machine or his own tail.


3 posted on 12/11/2008 7:11:38 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

That 76-page complaint is a treasure of said and unsaid things. If you read it carefully all kinds of interesting questions pop up.


4 posted on 12/11/2008 7:13:10 AM PST by bergmeid (Best entertainment I've had in a while.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

There are SO many people that I want to be Adisor B because they are in deep doo-doo. Isn’t Rahm “Advisor A”?? SWEET....can’t wait for that VICIOUS THUG PUNK to go down. I’m just waiting for the other ballet slipper to fall.


5 posted on 12/11/2008 7:13:58 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Didn’t Obama pull Jarrett’s name in a CYA move this week?


6 posted on 12/11/2008 7:14:29 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
“Advisor B, a Washington D.C.-based consultant.”

Hmmmm....many many possibilities...........

7 posted on 12/11/2008 7:14:29 AM PST by Red Badger (Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: JRochelle
Gee, we elect the Chicago Machine to the Presidency ... what could possibly go wrong?

Mainstream Media = Epic Fail

to the detriment of us all. This was active electioneering, not simply poor reporting.

9 posted on 12/11/2008 7:15:13 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

And there are a few puppeteers pulling O’s strings.


10 posted on 12/11/2008 7:15:22 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

My money is on “advisor B” being Chicago’s very own Rahm Emanuel or someone directly reporting to him and then thus up to zerO himself

The DNC/Washingont establishment with its goals for a 60 seat democrat majority Senate, would not be oblivious to who would be the new democrat senator from Illinois


11 posted on 12/11/2008 7:16:28 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

12 posted on 12/11/2008 7:16:37 AM PST by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
better because, according to Advisor B, from the president-elect’s perspective, there would be fewer ‘fingerprints’ on the president-elect’s involvement with Change to Win, because Change to Win already has an existing stream of revenue and, therefore, ‘you won’t have stories in four years that they bought you off.’”

Obama is in this so deep that he can barely keep his nose above water. I hope that justice prevails.

13 posted on 12/11/2008 7:17:04 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
They have more to worry about with Rezko than Blago............

Wait until we get to the second tier of players: Michelle Obama, Mrs. Rezko and Mrs. Blago and their real estate deal.

14 posted on 12/11/2008 7:17:15 AM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; maggief; retrokitten; Rose of Sharon

Who is Advisor B ping?!


15 posted on 12/11/2008 7:19:04 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Programs, get your programs here!

Rod Blagojevich
Patti Blagojevich
Mayor Richard Daley
ACORN
Tony Rezko
Father Flaeger
Rev. Wright
Jesse Jackson Jr.
Barry Obama
Louis Farrakhan
Bob Greenlee
Rashid Khalidi


16 posted on 12/11/2008 7:19:44 AM PST by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

B has to be the evil Bush.

Bush’s fault.


17 posted on 12/11/2008 7:20:29 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not foriegn or domestic terrorists or criminals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: bergmeid
...."all kinds of interesting questions pop up".....

The first thing I thought of is the talking heads were saying the fact that Blog called BHO a M$$effer shows BHO is totally innocent. I was thinking Blog didn't get an ambassadorship, but may have had something else offered( also illegal), that he didn't want. In any case BHO was negotiating with him. I don't see how Blog being pi$$ed makes BHO totally innocent.

The fun part is none of them know what Fitz has on tape. I expect there will be a whole bunch of "No comment due to the ongoing investigation." Gotta be careful what you say here.

19 posted on 12/11/2008 7:21:31 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Interesting. Before the scandal broke, Axelrod said Obama was in contact with Blago. Local news reported there would be, and subsequently reported that there was, a meeting between Obama and Blago discussing this. On the tapes, Blago is reportedly cursing Obama because his team offered only “appreciation” rather than cash for putting the Obama pick in the Senate.

Then the scandal breaks, and Obama said they never spoke - and all of the sudden Axelrod and the local news outlet retract their comments. (Any follow-up on why such an egregious error was made? What’s the explanation for the “false story” about a meeting being there in the first place? Who was involved in reporting the story? Has anyone asked them how they were so “mistaken?”)

So either (i) Obama never breathed a word to the Illinois governor about who he would want to be dealing with as one of a hundred members of a Senate teetering on the precipice of a filibuster-proof majority, Axelrod and the local news outlet (two very different actors in totally different positions with respect to the story and presumably relying on different sources) made the exact same mistake, and Blago was somehow delusional and hallucinated that he knew Obama’s preferred candidate for the job, or (ii) Obama made a false statement and Axelrod and the local media are covering for him.

Which is more likely?


20 posted on 12/11/2008 7:21:38 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson