Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Keeping embryos frozen in perpetuity is not homicide.
Your dishonesty is showing. I have not made a single reference to embryos once in this exchange. I asked you directly if you would be justified in killing an innocent to ensure your ability to procreate and you said, emphatically, YES.

In addition, you stated in Post #95 that frozen embryos degenerate over time. If they do, then perpetuity is not possible. Plus that other bummer that humans will not exist forever, so the whole point of freezing embryos in perpetuity is moot anyway, but you knew that.

267 posted on 12/12/2008 11:08:18 AM PST by BMiles2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: BMiles2112
Your dishonesty is showing. I have not made a single reference to embryos once in this exchange. I asked you directly if you would be justified in killing an innocent to ensure your ability to procreate and you said, emphatically, YES. In addition, you stated in Post #95 that frozen embryos degenerate over time. If they do, then perpetuity is not possible. Plus that other bummer that humans will not exist forever, so the whole point of freezing embryos in perpetuity is moot anyway, but you knew that.

Aw, what was I looking for again... oh yea, "YAWN!!!"

Those arguments were regarding the comparison between the terminally ill, in vegetative states, being hooked up to life-support machines and frozen embryos. Both are more or less in the same predicament.

271 posted on 12/12/2008 11:13:16 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: BMiles2112

I think I read that the “oldest” frozen embryo to actually lead to a live birth was an embryo that had been frozen for 10 years.

Just wanted to add this to the discussion.


273 posted on 12/12/2008 11:14:49 AM PST by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: BMiles2112
In addition, you stated in Post #95 that frozen embryos degenerate over time. If they do, then perpetuity is not possible...

Like I mentioned earlier, there is no defined moment of transition, with respect to time, when the embryo stops being a living entity. Since the boundary is not sharp, and as per the trend over here to define such phenomena as "chance," "upto God" and all that, ahem, jazz, I included that. You really can't prove that you can't freeze embryos perpetually.

I included this to compare the situation with the terminally ill, on machines.

279 posted on 12/12/2008 11:23:16 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson