Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The TRUE definition of a "Natural Born Citizen."
12-16-2008 | unknown

Posted on 12/16/2008 4:19:57 PM PST by briarbey b

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last
To: trumandogz

“Can you point to me where in the Constitution, legislation of case law, where “Natural Born Citizen” is defined?”

While you are waiting for a response, will you let me ask two questions?

1. Will you accept the definition provided by one of the authors of the 14th amemdment?
2. Do you believe if O was born in Kenya he is qualified to be president?


41 posted on 12/16/2008 5:42:20 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: briarbey b

It is in the last place you used it.


42 posted on 12/16/2008 5:42:42 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
It is not me that they need to disagree with, it is U.S. law.

There are two types of U.S. citizens. Natural born and naturalized. The natural born are those who are U.S. citizens at birth. The naturalized become U.S. citizens by legal proceedings. Obama never went through a naturalization process, so he is either a natural born citizen or an illegal immigrant.

43 posted on 12/16/2008 5:42:52 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

It is not impossible. There are enough officers that believe in the Constitution and the rule of law. All it takes is one with guts enough to do something. As soon as Obama is delared a usurper or suspected of being one then the US military is bound to move on it. The officers that are “political” and won’t have the guts to move on it will also not have the guts to oppose those who do. It may be surprising to see those that stand up and those that go to ground.

It is what happens after that, that will be interesting


44 posted on 12/16/2008 5:44:06 PM PST by .44 Special (Táimid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"However, in 1795 the Congress passed the Naturalization Act of 1795 which removed the words "natural born" from this statement to state that such children born to citizens beyond the seas are citizens of the U.S., but are not legally to be considered "natural born citizens" of the U.S. This was done to clarify for those living at that time who was and who was not a "natural born citizen" per the framers intent at that time, since the 1790 Act had introduced confusion into that subject in regards to the use of those words in the Constitution. George Washington was also President in 1795, and thus he was aware of this change. And if he disagreed with the clarification and change in the wording in the new act in 1795, he would have vetoed the Naturalization Act of 1795."

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
” ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen...”

45 posted on 12/16/2008 5:44:36 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

Native born is geographic. Natural born is allegiance based and can be based upon blood line as child of citizens no matter location of birth.


46 posted on 12/16/2008 5:45:57 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

N00b! Hasn’t Axcelrod changed your talking points for astroturfing yet?


47 posted on 12/16/2008 5:49:24 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

1. Unless his definition is included in the 14th Amendment, then no, his personal definition does not appear to be relevant.

2. If he was born on the moon to an American parent, then yes he is natural born.


48 posted on 12/16/2008 5:50:05 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob; mlo

That is an outright lie, and I suspect you damn wel know it! The law when Obama was supposedly born stated that his mother had to have been residing int he US for at least five years past the age of fourteen. You agitprop Obamanoid liars are getting bold!


49 posted on 12/16/2008 5:51:46 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Why would Axelrod agree with me? He wants Zero to show his BC to a court now like Johnnie Mac did?

One would think an “Old timer” would not say such stupid things.


50 posted on 12/16/2008 5:52:38 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde

Nice try. It isn’t ‘jumping or not jumping on a bandwagon’ it is the smartaleck ridicule and condescension, dumb blonde. Seems to be your stock and trade at FR.


51 posted on 12/16/2008 5:53:35 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

...here come the smart guys!! :) LOVE your tag line...how TRUE!!


52 posted on 12/16/2008 5:54:08 PM PST by briarbey b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot
1) no father named in the documents; 2) Frank Davis appears as the father’s name Oh please, these would not embarassing to a lib today. No father named would have been in the 60s, but not at all today. Frank Davis being the father would only enhance a Marxist these days, and would definitely make him a citizen. I can't see either of these being a problem for him, neither would having an unmarried mother.

He knew what ever the truth was when "he" wrote his books. He wouldn't have had to "make up" a story about his father if his father was someone else, just told the truth. Who would have cared?

53 posted on 12/16/2008 5:56:13 PM PST by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
"Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example."

You might want to follow the link to Sec. 1401 that takes you to Cornell's website. The above is not in the code that they show but appears to be the linking website's comments. In other words...0.

54 posted on 12/16/2008 5:56:29 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: .44 Special

It would be interesting to see Obama arrested at his inaugaration by a military officer. What would the secret service do? I would almost bet that there are others in positions of power within the US that know what the true score is with Obama. It may be a waiting game as he has really done nothing illegal until he tries to take office.

We are either a nation that lives under the rule of law, as set forth in the Constitution, The Bill of Right, and other legal enabling bodies or we are not.

We will soon know. Keep your powder dry.


55 posted on 12/16/2008 5:57:27 PM PST by .44 Special (Táimid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob; Admin Moderator

This old timer is calling you a liar.


56 posted on 12/16/2008 5:57:28 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: briarbey b
Nothing seems right or feels right!!

AMEN

57 posted on 12/16/2008 5:57:56 PM PST by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Are you practising for an Idiot license? Obama would not have been born a citizen to a mother under 18 at the time of birth. His mother was not old enough to pass it to him. She was within the US almost her whole life.

In no way are my remarks helpful to Obama’s case. Just because I forecast that the absurd Donofrio case was going nowhere does not mean I believe Obama is eligible.

Only someone intent on distorting my points would talk like you.


58 posted on 12/16/2008 5:57:58 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Yes, it is from U.S. Constitution.net. They are clarifying remarks to point out that...

1) A U.S. citizen at birth is a “natural born citizen”
2) The children of Military personnel serving overseas are “natural born citizens” (Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)).

Anyone born inside the United States
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

59 posted on 12/16/2008 5:59:59 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Thanks for chiming in just to sling your own insults.


60 posted on 12/16/2008 6:03:29 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (America: Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson