[frog in a pot]

“In fact if he has a different father or no father listed it is a great reason to hide the BC.”

FWIW, this is what I wrote on another thread:

Why is O spending large sums to avoid disclosing his birth documents? What could be embarrassing about O’s birth documents if he was born in Hawaii to Ann and O Sr.?

Based on what we presently are allowed to know, if O was born in Kenya clearly he is not natural born. O’s newspaper birth announcement, which states only: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug 4” indicates O was not the child of two US citizens.

What could be wrong? 1) no father named in the documents; 2) Frank Davis appears as the father’s name; 3) place of birth: Kenya; 4) any combination. Can you think of other embarrassing possibilities?

1) is unlikely given Ann and Sr. lived together before and after the birth and in light of the birth announcement published nine days later;
2) again, inconsistent with 1) above - although this would clumsily provide two (unmarried) parents who were US citizens. Further, even if Ann had relations with Davis long before any with Sr., why would anyone advocate offering the name of a man not one’s ostensible husband? There is simply no value in 1961 to the Davis name. Of course, there is value in the Davis name in 2007/8/9 and that may have been part of the self-serving motivation behind O’s sponsorship of the 2008 Senate resolution
3) this ought to be embarrassing because its inconsistent with the life story O tells; but, that would be the least of his problems.

Your thoughts?

[briarbey b]

I don’t understand what is so hard about this??? We have had 43 Presidents before this...has it ever been an issue before? Why do I feel like the sh*t is about to hit the fan??? Nothing seems right or feels right!!

[Hang'emAll]

Your thoughts?...

The whole thing is so convoluted and no one except Obama has the real story. So many possibilities, there is no way to accurately guess what is on the original BC.

And we should not have to guess he should have shown us the original. Since he refuses to show us any, I repeat any records, of course everyone will make their own guess.

[YellowRoseofTx]

1) no father named in the documents; 2) Frank Davis appears as the father’s name Oh please, these would not embarassing to a lib today. No father named would have been in the 60s, but not at all today. Frank Davis being the father would only enhance a Marxist these days, and would definitely make him a citizen. I can't see either of these being a problem for him, neither would having an unmarried mother.

He knew what ever the truth was when "he" wrote his books. He wouldn't have had to "make up" a story about his father if his father was someone else, just told the truth. Who would have cared?