I’m sorry I forgot the URL. Whenever you see an error of forgetting a URL, then wrap the title in quotation marks, e.g. “Hubble’s most amazing images from 2008” after putting it in a search engine. Yahoo or Google should find it. I was busy on another thread. What if I dropped dead? The thread has been linked.
Then we would never be able to see the other 41 pictures. ;-)
He'd probably fall to the ground:)
A Giant Breach in Earth's Magnetic Field
Diabetes control better with low-glycemic diet
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
I didn’t complain about the missing link (for what it’s worth, I already knew how to find it) but I certainly hope you don’t drop dead. I used to work for a guy who would complain anytime I failed to write something down. “I don’t care if you know,” he’d say, “I don’t know. What if you get hit by a truck?” I never got hit by a truck, but I did get tired of his excessive supervision and found another job.
Merry Christmas, and try not to get hit by a truck in the coming new year.
Yes it had been linked in a subsequent reply .. calm down, nobody is holding the 'missing link' against you.
We were able to see the 42 magnificent 2008 Hubble photos of our Cosmos in great detail, and marveled at them all :)
And OK, to some of the sarcastic comments about "Photoshop" and "NASA creates nice colors" and such and such smarmy comments ... so what? Have we become so politically cynical that we discard the wonders of God's creation just because its data has been transformed into a visual form which we are able to view on a computer screen? And on that note, isn't what we're doing here just a bunch of 1's and 0's transformed into letters and words which we happen to recognize, as humans?
Just as a point of perspective regarding *reality* vs. our experience of it, an Atom is composed mostly of empty space, so hence a 'solid' isn't really solid at all .. it is mostly empty space, with invisible subatomic forces making up what we might see and feel as being "solid".
NASA's Hubble continues to beam back spectacular photos of our Cosmos, and I thank you, Neverdem, for posting this thread.
MM
Looking at it as it is now a click on the original source or a click on the excerpt read more...gets you to the NYNews site and the pictures....is the complaining that many don't understand that?
Please don't do that.
It occurs to me that the people on this thread that have the time to make such silly pokes at you could find a better use of that said same time by going and finding the link all by themselves. But then go figure.......