Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 12/24/2008 2:47:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

Locked - civility suffering here. Personal attacks, calling people names, insulting them just isn’t nice - and it can easily result in being banned - just a word to the wise.



Skip to comments.

BREAKING -- Berg v Obama - Scheduled for SCOTUS Conference TWICE on Jan 16
US Supreme Court ^ | 12/23/08 | US Supreme Court

Posted on 12/23/2008 12:42:44 PM PST by BP2

No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.


---------------

No. 08A505
Title:

Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

  Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1600penn; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; creepy; obama; obci; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-305 next last
Comment #181 Removed by Moderator

To: trumandogz

“From the evidence presented, it would appear that BHO was born in Hawaii and that would without question make him a natural born citizen.”

What evidence are you referring to and who “presented” it to you?


182 posted on 12/23/2008 8:57:05 PM PST by Principle Over Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“I’ll just go on maintaining that the Constitution is perfectly clear on this matter”

And what pray tell is the clear meaning of the constitution on this matter?

“Any talented con man who arguably was born in one of the four states where birth certificates are private by statute must be allowed the presumption of being a natural born citizen”?

Did I get it right? Or do you have some other “clear meaning” to propose?

The Supreme Court of course does not always get the last word. In December 1856 Chief Justice Taney wrote for a 7-2 majority:
“They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.”

It turned out that that wasn’t exactly crystal clear, was it?

There is no clear agreement who is a natural born citizen under Article 2, or who is to enforce the provision. It does seem crystal clear that Barry Obama is hiding something of a serious nature. Just because someone says “it’s crystal clear” that will not make this grave constitutional crisis go away.


183 posted on 12/23/2008 8:58:23 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Gemsbok; Red Steel
Nah, it's not that big money, it's a labor of love...!

They hang on like ticks on a hound, don't they?

184 posted on 12/23/2008 9:01:26 PM PST by luvadavi (Chinese curse: may you live in interesting times...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

And I have no forgiveness or trust of 0bama who has proven himself - even if he turns out to somehow be a natural born citizen - anything other than a lying, marxist, (former) crack head, narcissistic, racist, radical Muslim terrorist sympathizing, huge gov’t spending, criminal dirty politics practicing, homosexual agenda friendly, baby killing thug whose associates are to a man (and woman) similar slime, and has hidden practically all records about his entire life.


185 posted on 12/23/2008 9:03:50 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“From the evidence presented, it would appear that BHO was born in Hawaii and that would without question make him a natural born citizen.”

Could you please detail what that evidence is.


186 posted on 12/23/2008 9:05:28 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: All

It seems as though more than a couple of these people themselves have dual or even triple citizenship, or were born in foreign countries, or have children or relatives who were so born. And the idea that none of them might be eligible to president if 0bama isn’t, upsets them.

Becoming president is not a right, for one thing.

That is, if what they are saying about their own citizenship, birth, relatives’ births, etc is true. On the internet, one never knows.


187 posted on 12/23/2008 9:08:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american
I learned of the subpoenas here at FreeRepublic.

All all can find is that subpoenas were requested in the petion to the court. The service date for the Hawaii Department of Health Statistics, was to have been yesterday. I think if that had been served, it would have shown up in my search.

188 posted on 12/23/2008 9:16:01 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html

Does not say anything about Natural Born Citizenship. It talks about Citizens and Nationals "at birth", but not natural born citizens or natural born citizenship.

189 posted on 12/23/2008 9:21:20 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: mlo

The intent and writing of the Constitution IS crystal clear, I capitalized the differences in the requirements. If a simple requirement of ordinary citizenship was the POTUS requirement, they would have said CITIZEN consistently. Instead they said:

Article. I.
No Person shall be a REPRESENTATIVE who shall not have attained to the Age of TWENTY FIVE YEARS, and been SEVEN YEARS a CITIZEN of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

No Person shall be a SENATOR who shall not have attained to the Age of THIRTY YEARS, and been NINE YEARS a CITIZEN of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of PRESIDENT; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of THIRTY FIVE YEARS, and been FOURTEEN Years a Resident within the United States.

So here we have it:

US Representative: Age 25, 7 yrs. resident & citizen
US Senator.......: Age 30, 9 yrs. resident & citizen
US PRESIDENT.....: Age 35, 14yrs. resident & NATURAL BORN

Obama has always known that he dooes not meet the requirement of Natural Born. It explains why he attempted to insert verbage into Senate Resolution 511 and the Passport breeches (thrice) by those advisors related to his campaign.


190 posted on 12/23/2008 9:21:52 PM PST by Gemsbok (If wishes were horses, than beggars would ride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Sorry, I will never be bedfellows with a person who wants to charge our president with murder.


191 posted on 12/23/2008 9:23:50 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu
Generally speaking, if your case is not even heard in any of the lower courts, its kind of stupid to keep appealing the case to SC.

Wrong. That is exactly how cases get to be heard by the SCOTUS.

192 posted on 12/23/2008 9:24:34 PM PST by Polarik (quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlo
This doesn't help you.

It helps me a hell of a lot more than it helps you. In addition, reason is on my side.

193 posted on 12/23/2008 9:26:08 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: devere
“I was am a natural born citizen and I was born not long after Obama and outside of the United States. I have a Birth Certificate issued by the US Embassy to prove it.”

You can have 100 birth certificates but you won't be a natural-born citizen.

194 posted on 12/23/2008 9:28:03 PM PST by Polarik (quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mlo
If you could substitute truth for condescension you'd be right.

So, what is this? If I try to explain how this works to someone else, it's condescending? What's condescending is insisting against all reason and precedent that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong without providing a single shred of explanation or justification - like you have.

195 posted on 12/23/2008 9:29:24 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: calenel

Okay, so if he was born in Hawaii, he would be a natural born citizen?


196 posted on 12/23/2008 9:29:42 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

Comment #197 Removed by Moderator

To: TruthWillWin

Perhaps I missed it, but what you linked said nothing about natural born citizen.


198 posted on 12/23/2008 9:33:39 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

For most people, the issue of “natural born” is completely irrelevant.

The only job or position I know of where this is a requirement is that of the President of the United States. It is unique in this respect.


199 posted on 12/23/2008 9:34:17 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Would that January 9th Berg conference be before or after Dick Cheney and the House and Senate confirm the vote of the Electoral College?
200 posted on 12/23/2008 9:39:19 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson