That is the specific point where I disagree with you - there is plenty of anecdotal evidence to the contrary, along with the credible analysis of the COLB done by Polarik. We are talking about the single most important job in the entire world, for which, perhaps, 2% of the people on the planet are qualified. As far as I'm concerned, as the actions of the POTUS affect everyone on the planet, at least potentially, thus giving 'standing' to the most ignorant and isolated Whopper Virgin on Earth. Anyone who wants to should have the opportunity to be credibly informed as to the unquestioned eligibility of the person assuming that office. It is bad enough that we have Obama where he is. We are entitled to know the truth so that we can take future action toward any appropriate remedy, even if he demonstrates irrefutable evidence of eligibility.
Additionally, Charles Pinckney in 1800 said the presidential eligibility clause was designed “to insure … attachment to the country.”
What better way to insure attachment to the country then to require the President to have inherited his American citizenship through his American father and not through a foreign father. Any child can be born anywhere in the country and removed by their father to be raised in his native country. The risks would be for the child to return in later life to reside in this country bringing with him foreign influences and intrigues.