The Missing 13th Amendment

The Commentator ^ | 24DEC08 | Unknown

[Daddynoz]

TITLES OF NOBILITY” AND “HONOR”

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government.

So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States. Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860.

In June of this year, Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from our Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War.

Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous.

The story of this “missing” Amendment is complex and at times confusing because the political issues and vocabulary of the American Revolution were different from our own. However, there are essentially two issues: What does the Amendment mean? and, Was the Amendment ratified? Before we consider the issue of ratification, we should first understand the Amendment’s meaning and consequent current relevance.

MEANING of the 13th Amendment

The “missing” 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” [Emphasis added.}

At the first reading, the meaning of this 13th Amendment (also called the “title of nobility” Amendment) seems obscure, unimportant. The references to “nobility”, “honour”, “emperor”, “king”, and “prince” lead us to dismiss this amendment as a petty post-revolution act of spite directed against the British monarchy. But in our modern world of Lady Di and Prince Charles, anti-royalist sentiments seem so archaic and quaint, that the Amendment can be ignored.

Not so.

Consider some evidence of its historical significance: First, “titles of nobility” were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Sect. 9 of the Constitution of the United States (1778); Second, although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional “title of nobility” amendment was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and according to Dodge, finally ratified in 1819. Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in “titles of nobility” and “honors” that anyone receiving them would forfeit their citizenship. Since the government prohibited “titles of nobility” several times over four decades, and went through the amending process (even though “titles of nobility” were already prohibited by the Constitution), it’s obvious that the Amendment carried much more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent today.

SIGNIFICANCE OF REMOVAL

To create the present oligarchy (rule by lawyers) which we now endure, the lawyers first had to remove the 13th “titles of nobility” Amendment that might otherwise have kept them in check. In fact, it was not until after the Civil War and after the disappearance of this 13th Amendment, that American bar associations began to appear and exercise political power.

Since the unlawful deletion of the 13th Amendment, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as “Esquires” and received the “honor” of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only lawyers may now hold. By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens. Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political office. This twotiered citizenship is clearly contrary to Americans’ political interests, the nation’s economic welfare, and the Constitution’s egalitarian spirit.

The significance of this missing 13th Amendment and its deletion from the Constitution is this: Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land. If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from our current government system.

[Daddynoz]

It might be BS...you decide. I have read about nineteenth century disgruntlement regarding this issue, I had not heard (read) that it resulted in an amendment. Hence, the jaundiced eye as to its veracity.

[TomServo]

I wish folks knew how to spell “Amendment”.

[netmilsmom]

btt

[Congressman Billybob]

Your jaundiced eye is correct. There are printed copies of the Constitution from a couple decades ago which showed the Equal Rights Amendment as part of the Constitution. Everyone assumed that it would be ratified, and some made the mistake of printing it as final.

Same situation here.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Come Back to 1600, Johnny Dean, Johnny Dean"

The Declaration, the Constitution, parts of the Federalist, and America's Owner's Manual, here.

[Daddynoz]

a⋅mend⋅ment   /əˈmɛndmənt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [uh-mend-muhnt] Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. the act of amending or the state of being amended. 2. an alteration of or addition to a motion, bill, constitution, etc. 3. a change made by correction, addition, or deletion: The editors made few amendments to the manuscript. 4. Horticulture. a soil-conditioning substance that promotes plant growth indirectly by improving such soil qualities as porosity, moisture retention, and pH balance. Folks, like myself, are publik skool grajits and don't know any better.

[G.Mason]

You've only got two wishes remaining.

[stockpirate]

Here is a ping that will leave you scratching your head.

[briarbey b]

Another amendment? To WHAT constitution....do we have one of those????

[oh8eleven]

Ammen to that.

[BradyLS]

Sounds like a Supreme Court case in the making if true.

But you know Congress would immediately move “fix” the problem.

[FReepaholic]

Interesting.

I've wondered about the deal where lawyers are "Officers of the Court". If they're "Officers of the Court" then they're beholden to the Judicial Branch of government, right? So, why are they then allowed to serve in the other two branches, Legislative and Executive?

[SpaceBar]

13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government.

I have long held the opinion that a law degree should be grounds for immediate disqualification from public office.

[Daddynoz]

“Your jaundiced eye is correct...”

That makes sense. Aren’t you clever. Thanks for the info. Cool.

[stockpirate]

The Thirteenth Amendment
by Gordon Leidner of Great American History
The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution, passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery as a legal institution.

The Constitution, although never mentioning slavery by name, refers to slaves as “such persons” in Article I, Section 9 and “a person held to service or labor” in Article IV, Section 2. The Thirteenth Amendment, in direct terminology, put an end to this. The amendment states:

Section 1:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2:

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

[colorado tanker]

Tis the season - for conspiracy theories.

[webboy45]

He is misleading about the amendment. Lawyers don’t hold titles given by Emperors or other governments. That’s how it reads. (note the placement of commas)

[Da Coyote]

As bad as lawyers, methinks a simple IQ test will suffice to eliminate the vast majority of the house and senate - as well as our recent (and upcoming) president.

We must remember why these lawyers are now lawmakers - they couldn’t earn a living as lawyers.

[mondonico]

This is one of the stupidest articles I’ve read in a while. A license to practice law is no more a title of nobility than a license to practice medicine, a license to install electrical service, a license to sell firearms, or a license to cut hair.

That said, I agree that lawyers generally suck at administration and governance, and that there are too many in government. (I am a lawyer.)

[SkipW]

That is a great question. Unfortunately every lawyer or lawyer in black robes will consider it and reject it in about 10 seconds.

They will probably tell you that you have no standing that would allow you to challenge the status quo. After all, you are probably just a citizen. What do you know?

[SalukiLawyer]

When the Queen of England conferred upon me the title of Esquire at my law school graduation I was promised no one would ever find the suppressed 13th Amendment. Now that the secret is out that we’re all foreign nobility I will lose my state job. Thanks a lot. Oh well, I guess I’ll just live on the revenues from my estate in Kent. At least Obama is out of the Whilte House. Cheerio!