who ya gonna call when ya wanna bust a liberal?
Posted on 01/07/2009 11:02:05 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20
I’m heading out to find her latest in the bankrupt heart of liberalism: Madison, WI. Wonder if the mincing, dawdling middle-aged pierced and tattooed leftist I’ll undoubtedly encounter at the bookstore checkout will manage to hold back their crazy sneer when they see the book cover. Ann is to these people like garlic, crosses and mirrors are to vampires.
I love going out to buy Ann Coulter books. Especially at our oh so liberal Barnes & Noble.
there is an underlying reason why the left promote single moms. its a bit involved, and i would love to run it passed Anne some time over a drink :)
Deification except for, of course, the 'single motherhood' (which really isn't) of Bristol Palin. They're horrified by that.
who ya gonna call when ya wanna bust a liberal?
Her opponents DON'T.
Because every liberal assumes they're brilliant and, conversely, in their dank little minds, all conservatives are dopes, some of them foolishly think they'll 'put her in her place' when Ann sits down with them for a brief interview intended to promote her latest book. That rarely happens and if it seems too, it is usually a result of the interviewer talking (shouting) over Ann and refusing to allow her to respond to their often absurd accusations and insults, a la Harry Smith's ambush 'interview' on CBS.
Despite her pretty face and slender form, liberals have good reason to fear Ann Coulter. She nails liberal lies and failures, often with unassailable documentation, and does so with élan. Unlike most politicians and too many other 'conservative' commentators, she is fearless.
May Ann's career prosper and her fame grow as she fights the good fight against liberal lies and false pretentions.
Watch the lefties go bonkers.
My favorite part of the Marsha Lauer interview was when Ann said the the press asked Barky tough questions like what do you think your parents would be feeling, while Sarah was having to memorize the last 7 kings of Swaziland.
Many years ago, a friend gave me a copy of the Communist goals for this country. It's from the Congressional Record, 1963. I laughed and thought she was a bit of a chicken little. I was wrong.
Along with infiltrate the media (check) and schools (check), eliminate prayer in schools (check), belittle the Founding Fathers (check), one finds number 40 on the list: Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. (check)
This is no longer the Country I knew. (Paraphrasing the anointed one.)
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Exactly! Some other thread earlier today was about how Bristol Palin and her beau have been called “unwed parents” by the media. I can’t remember the last time I’ve heard that!
Ann Coulter VIDEO -- from the "Today" show (1/7/09)Now posted on the premier CONSERVATIVE video website, popmodal.com:
and
Ann Coulter:
"GENERAL ELECTRIC BACKS DOWN TO 99-POUND GIRL IN BLACK COCKTAIL DRESS"
Runtime: 10m 16s
Video hosting courtesy of:
Ann Coulter:
NBC Today Show w/Kathie Lee Gifford - Avoiding the Issues
Runtime: 7m 45s
bump
yes, the 1963 florida congressional record was very enlightening when i first read it. of course, i was already aware stuff was happening and i had seen a pattern... i just didn’t know people had been on to them for so long.
keep in mind, today’s liberal isn’t quite the same as those described in 1963. yes, the goals are the same... but today’s liberal is the useful idiot for the cold war socialist/communist hell bent on undermining the fabric of American society (just as we were seeding capitalism into their social fabric). today’s liberal is the result of their socialist teachers from the 70s... which were taught by the 1950s communist university professor... many of whom were cold war spies for the ussr. as a result, the liberal today is carrying out the plans of the cold war agents... they just don’t realize it.
as for single moms... it’s all based around the central dividing point between the two major political parties... the social program. (this takes a bit to unfold, sorry... but you did ask)
the dems are the party of the social program. welfare, affirmative action, planned parent, etc. they realize if they can get people into a position of using a social program... or just being CLOSE to needing one... then those people will 90+% of the time vote democrat. as such, the dems have a VESTED interest in keeping people either in or close to needing a social program.
the gop, realizing that anyone that goes into a social program is a lost vote... have a vested interest to keep you away from needing such a program.
you;re probably thinking that such a thing sounds crazy. how could the dems get people into social programs? that’s easy.
promote crime via tv and make it look edgey and cool... thereby getting a few kids, 8th grade to 12th, that may try it. promote drug use, tattoos, piercings, and free sex the same way. people going down any of these roads will have a high probability of not doing quite so well in school. this reduces their career capabilities and may result in worse situations.
promote affairs as exciting, fresh, edgey, and cool... thereby messing up families and potentially breaking up the marriage.
kids coming from broken homes have an extremely high probability to end up in poverty... thereby in need of a social program. (there was a book called the bell curve from the late 80s... one chart i remember had kids from normal homes with less then 5% chance of poverty while kids from broken homes had about a 40% chance... a massive increase)
broken homes can be the result of death, divorce or single parent (moms).
by promoting this litany of potential social traps for people, dems hope to trip them up and there by sow the seeds for future dem voters.
the dems have no real interest in helping the little guy, a misconception they’ve pushed on the little guy for a long time. but... they have a VESTED interest in keeping the little guy just above drowning perpetually.
The Media and Bill O’Reilly don’t want to discuss the issues, they want to discuss Ann Coulter’s style. Their goal is to shoot the messenger. Bill is just jealous of her. He is self-serving.
You may also recall that during the Supreme Court debate on abortion—Roe vs Wade—many warned that establishing abortion as a women’s right would result in the deaths of millions of babies. These people were laughted at. Fast forward to today and what do we have? The mindless creation of millions of human babies who are subsequently murdered. Heck, The Marxist Onada even voted against a bill that would protect human babies who survived abortion.
Marxism requires the destruction of the family and community unit. It also requires the destruction of religion—all religions—so that the state becomes the new God and source of work, food, housing and clothing. And it requires control of all forms of communication. Finally, it requires ownership of the economy so that it can ensure that all citizens—excepting the ruling elite—suffer equally. Once personal initiative and risk taking are not rewarded—or even punished—any economy is destined to ultimately fail.
There was an article in our local demrat shill paper this morning about The Marxist Onada’s inauguration being a prime terrorist target. I told my wife that I found that curious since The Messiah would seem to be a friend of theirs—given his stance on unilateral military withdrawal of US troops from the Mideast; and America being a flawed and evil country.
On second thought Islamo fundamentalist terrorists know the Marxian position on religion and they must know Onada is a Marxist. So, this morning’s story may actually be correct—but not for the reason one would think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.