Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

You wrote:

“Since you lump the pot issue in with taxes and national security, I take that as a possible endorsement of the federal war on pot.”

I didn’t lump them together. I juxtaposed them. Hence the word “but”.

“Now, if I’m wrong and you think it should be up to the states to decide the legality of pot, then I withdraw the question.”

You’re withdrawal of the questions has nothing to do with my position on your rabbit trail inquiry. Withdrawal it, don’t withdrawal it, I see no reason to deal with it since it doesn’t apply in any since to what is at hand.

“If you do support the federal war on pot, then I would appreciate an answer.”

Your appreciation is completely unimportant to me.


140 posted on 02/05/2009 6:51:29 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
I didn't lump them together. I juxtaposed them. Hence the word "but".

You did say "many Freepers were flaming leftists on pot".

You should at least explain what constitutes a "flaming leftie position" on pot. Please read and respond to the following:

Let's say someone argues that the decision to legalize mj constitutionally belongs to the states, rather than to the federal government.

Is that a leftie position, or is that a conservative position, in your opinion?

148 posted on 02/05/2009 7:57:33 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson