Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Backs 90-Percent 'Bonus Tax' to 'Protect' Taxpayers From Executives
CNS News ^

Posted on 03/19/2009 6:14:42 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Pelosi Backs 90-Percent 'Bonus Tax' to 'Protect' Taxpayers From Executives Thursday, March 19, 2009 By Susan Jones, Senior Editor

(CNSNews.com) - Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), himself under fire for alleged ethics violations (see story), is the author of a House bill that would impose additional, special taxes on those who received bonuses from companies that accepted taxpayer bailouts.

Employees of bailed-out companies who received bonuses after Dec. 31, 2008 – as stipulated in their contracts -- would have 90 percent of the money taxed away under a bill that the House is expected to take up on Thursday.

"We figured that the local and state governments would take care of the other 10 percent," the Associated Press quoted Rangel as saying.

The bonuses subject to special taxes include "any retention payment, incentive payment, or other bonus" given to employees whose overall income (other than bonuses) exceeds $250,000.

While the AIG situation has prompted outrage, members of Congress also are under fire in some quarters for approving the financial bailout plan without restrictions that might have limited such bonuses.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) – a top recipient of campaign donations from AIG employees – on Wednesday acknowledged that he agreed to weaken a provision that would have prevented the payout of bonuses such as those received by some AIG employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2009 6:14:42 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is an outrage.

There are many, many honest, hard-working executives who receive bonuses. They were promised a bonus, they earned the bonus. Stupid, stupid plan.


2 posted on 03/19/2009 6:17:12 AM PDT by Reagan69 (No Representation without Taxation !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder if “excessive” compensation plans for auto union executives will be targeted by congress.


3 posted on 03/19/2009 6:18:51 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
'Protect' Taxpayers From Executives

If the taxpayers money hadn't been taken via IRS gunpoint and given to the executives in the first place then the taxpayer wouldn't need "protection".

The taxpayer needs protection from CONGRESS and LIBERALS.
4 posted on 03/19/2009 6:19:11 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socialismisinsidious

We need to protect the taxpayers from government, never mind corporate executives.

My suggestion is to write a law that says all publicly held companies cannot contribute to either politicians or PACS.


5 posted on 03/19/2009 6:21:58 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The most corrupt administration in history. And it is only 8 weeks old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I don't like the idea of giving out these bonuses to the division that caused the problem -—

But I hate the idea of the government micromanaging business decisions.

I also hate the idea of ex-post-facto laws and bills of attainder.

Populism is a very dangerous thing. It leads to mob rule and lawlessness parading as law.

6 posted on 03/19/2009 6:23:42 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Anyone who has ever gotten a bonus knows that they are taxed at the Unearned Income Tax Rate when the check is cut.


7 posted on 03/19/2009 6:24:01 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

These people are such hypocrites. They don’t have a problem taking political contributions from these same companies. I am so sick of them all. I wish we the people had the power to DRAIN THE SWAMP. However, that will never happen as long as we have a corrupt media and acorn groups stealing elections.


8 posted on 03/19/2009 6:26:10 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

“Anyone who has ever gotten a bonus knows that they are taxed at the Unearned Income Tax Rate when the check is cut.”

That’s not true. Taxes are only WITHHELD at a higher rate.


9 posted on 03/19/2009 6:29:18 AM PDT by babygene (It seems that stupidity is the most abundant element in the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Employees of bailed-out companies who received bonuses after Dec. 31, 2008 – as stipulated in their contracts -- would have 90 percent of the money taxed away

Yeah. That's equal protection for you.

ML/NJ

10 posted on 03/19/2009 6:30:59 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

My yearly bonus has never been taxed at that rate...


11 posted on 03/19/2009 6:31:08 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Why take it from the employees anyway?

If you think AIG should not have given the bonuses, then make AIG pay back the money to the government.

This is not the employee’s fault and it should not be their problem.

This is between Obama admin and AIG management.


12 posted on 03/19/2009 6:34:10 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
OK
What about the Bonuses paid to Freddie & Fannie
Namely Franklin Raines! ! ! ! !
13 posted on 03/19/2009 6:38:04 AM PDT by DeaconRed (It's 100 Times worse than we thought. BO Has to go before his term ends. Has to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They want to control all salaries. This is just to prepare the public for that day.


14 posted on 03/19/2009 6:38:48 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“We need to protect the taxpayers from government, never mind corporate executives.”

Bingo!


15 posted on 03/19/2009 6:39:03 AM PDT by Canedawg (Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Laura Ingram, subbing for O’Reilly last night brought up a good point ...such taxes aimed directly at individuals would violate the Constitutional prohibition of bills of attainder. Obviously Pelosi doesn’t take her oath to defend the Constitution very seriously.


16 posted on 03/19/2009 6:42:59 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How much can we dock the pay of congressional members for malfeasance?
17 posted on 03/19/2009 6:44:49 AM PDT by Puddleglum (Obama Lied/My 401K Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I am convinced these politicians have no minds. They need to be out of office.


18 posted on 03/19/2009 6:44:52 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
I read an article in Fortune on this topic.

The money quote was from the head of Deutche Bank...he couldn't wait for these laws to take effect, as Wall Street's best and brightest would come to work for him.

Going to be hard for America to come back from all this, when its politicans insist on hamstringing the people who can accomplish it.

19 posted on 03/19/2009 6:47:25 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Forget the AIG bonuses, how about taxing members of Congress at a 200% rate. To pay for all of their “bleep” ups!


20 posted on 03/19/2009 6:47:26 AM PDT by RdhseRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson