Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Notre Dame's Bishop Boycotts Obama-Honoring Graduation (contact info and msm coverage)
LifeSite News ^ | March 24, 2009

Posted on 03/24/2009 1:26:23 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: napscoordinator

We go as far as the charter allows and not farther. If ND wishes to dispose of its Catholic charter, then can invite whoever is not in violation of the charter they subsequently choose. The present charter is to maintain the Cathoic character of the university. It is compatible with having speakers who are not Catholic, it is not compatible with having speakers fundamentally opposed to Catholic values.


21 posted on 03/24/2009 2:12:10 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden; GBA; Niuhuru; Man50D; napscoordinator; annalex; Dionysius; ConorMacNessa; ...
Biahop's boycotting the festivities? (Sigh.) It's a good first bite. But for a man-sized portion, check this out: Massive civil disobedience brewing at Notre Dame.
22 posted on 03/24/2009 2:14:23 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The Church of the Living God: the Pillar and Foundation of the Truth." 1 Timothy 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “Although widespread public anger has rightfully focused on bonuses AIG paid to top executives using taxpayers’ money, that anger would be at an even higher pitch if the public knew that our tax dollars were being used by AIG to promote Islam and Shariah law, which provides support for terrorist activities aimed at killing Americans and destroying America.” The basis of the lawsuit is that AIG intentionally promotes Shariah-compliant businesses and insurance products, which by necessity must comply with the 1200 year old body of Islamic canon law based on the Quran, which demands the conversion, subjugation, or destruction of the infidel West, including the United States. Dick Thomson is here to explain.
http://avemariaradio.net/showArchive.php?id=kpm

“Although widespread public anger has rightfully focused on bonuses AIG paid to top executives using taxpayers’ money, that anger would be at an even higher pitch if the public knew that our tax dollars were being used by AIG to promote Islam and Shariah law, which provides support for terrorist activities aimed at killing Americans and destroying America.”

Sorry to interrupt the thread but does anyone know about this...one can listen to it at the above link.

PS: I’ve signed the petition, sent emails and will also write letters re-ND.


23 posted on 03/24/2009 2:28:39 PM PDT by chase19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
At a special assembly in Englewood, Colo., back in 2004, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops made a ruling that no Catholic institution is to provide a platform or honors for anybody (politician or private citizen, Democrat or Republican, Catholic or not) who advocates the violation of fundamental moral norms.

So, to make it plain and simple, Obama is not eligible to speak on Notre Dame's platform or be bestowed with Notre Dame's honors.

True, the "no platform, no honors" ruling has been manfully enforced by some bishops, only intermittently by others.

This event is galvanizing people in a way I cannot remember seeing in the past 20 years, because

That's why the brouhaha. Here. Now.

24 posted on 03/24/2009 2:30:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The Church of the Living God: the Pillar and Foundation of the Truth." 1 Timothy 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

To get real results send an email to the following:

ourmosthighdearleader@whitehouse.gov


25 posted on 03/24/2009 2:33:11 PM PDT by stockpirate (A people unwilling to use extreme violence to preserve liberty, deserves the tyrant that rules them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
"Obama is not just passively or squishily "pro-choice," but is actively and aggressively promoting abortion literally around the world, moving to strip healthcare providers (both individuals and institutions) of conscience rights concerning objectively immoral procedures, as well as supporting infanticide in the case of infants born alive subsequent to attempted abortion, and the killig of adult citizens under Terri-Schiavo circumstances; (whew) and..."

..... don't forget the machetes and burning tires.
26 posted on 03/24/2009 2:41:56 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dionysius

True, but again, the media was hyping up the chance for people to be part of ‘history.’


27 posted on 03/24/2009 2:49:19 PM PDT by Niuhuru (Fine, here's my gun, but let me give you the bullets first. I'll send them to you through the barrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Is this because the President is Democrat?

No, it's about his committed support of abortion -- especially his support of "late term" abortion.

"The first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act," Obama said in his July, 2007, speech to abortion advocates worried about the increase of pro-life legislation at the state level.

The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) is legislation Obama has co-sponsored along with 18 other senators that would annihilate every single state law limiting or regulating abortion, including the federal ban on partial birth abortion.

He is so pro-abortion that he refused as an Illinois state senator to support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions because he did not want to concede -- as he explained in a cold-blooded speech on the Illinois Senate floor -- that these babies, fully outside their mothers' wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were in fact "persons."

28 posted on 03/24/2009 2:59:41 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Just calling themselves “Catholics” is all that matters to them, I think. I don’t like it, but it’s no different from, for example, the non-observant Jew who somehow identifies as a Jew for ethnic purposes.


29 posted on 03/24/2009 3:04:32 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Here's an idea: SILENCE THIS NOTRE DAME PRIEST.
30 posted on 03/24/2009 3:08:40 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Glad to see SOMETHING but in my humble opinion he pretty much scored a field goal when we NEEDED a touchdown.


31 posted on 03/24/2009 3:09:50 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Let’s make some noise — this is an outrage:

http://notredamescandal.com/

Also, Father Jenkins can be reached at 574.631.3903.


32 posted on 03/24/2009 4:27:54 PM PDT by victory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Something like 54% of weekly-maass attending Catholics voted for Bambi, but most of them were Hispanic Catholics who are very left-wing because they are under the control of mostly Anglo clergy who are very, very left-wing.

I believe the non-Hispanic (and non-university, since the university is a big leftie hang-out) Catholic vote was considerably lower.

On the other hand, 78% of Jews voted for Bambi. Why? Neither one of these groups, Catholic or Jewish, had any excuse for voting for Bambi.


33 posted on 03/24/2009 4:30:29 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dionysius
They should have shown this gumption when they allowed the majority of Catholics to vote for a baby-killer. The Catholic Church does not control its members votes, other than to tell them they should not vote for a pro-abortion candidate. If people refuse to follow the Church's teaching, it is THEIR sin, and not the fault of the Church.

We have a lot of people who are Catholic dur to their birth and upbringing, but they long ago left the teachings of the Church. Phil Donahue, who went to Notre Dame, was on Fox today saying that the Church needs to enter the 21st Century and allow birth control, divorce, abortion, gay marriage, etc.

Of course Donahue is divorced, pushes for all of these liberal issues, and generally has left the Church except for claiming Catholicism when it suits him.

34 posted on 03/24/2009 4:45:57 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

These may be all posted, but continue to send messages!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2210995/posts?page=28#28

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2210995/posts?page=87#87

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2210995/posts?page=101#101

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2210995/posts?page=102#102

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2212664/posts?page=29#29

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2212664/posts?page=37#37


35 posted on 03/24/2009 4:58:30 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good list of contacts! Thanks!


36 posted on 03/24/2009 4:58:53 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Then the Church’s position on voting for pro-abortion candidates should have been screamed from every pulpit and ambo, but it wasn’t. And do you know I think? I think that, if Obama had been white, this would have happened.


37 posted on 03/24/2009 5:02:31 PM PDT by Dionysius (Jingoism is no vice in these troubled times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
I love how the Catholic Church is taking a stand against The One. say what you will about them, they have gumption when it counts.

Well, at least this one bishop is. As for the rest of the RC Church, we shall see...

38 posted on 03/24/2009 5:02:33 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
How did this start anyway??? Is this because the President is Democrat? I think some Catholics are Democrats but not many.

Go back to sleep, Chief, this obviously doesn't concern you.

39 posted on 03/24/2009 5:04:45 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good news! Thanks.


40 posted on 03/24/2009 6:05:58 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson