Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Tax Chair Wants Vote This Year to Raise Taxes on People Making as Little as $104,425
CNS News ^

Posted on 04/01/2009 9:18:06 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Senate Tax Chair Wants Vote This Year to Raise Taxes on People Making as Little as $104,425 Wednesday, April 01, 2009 By Matt Cover

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee which has jurisdiction over federal tax law, is seeking a vote this year on legislation that would increase the income tax rates on some Americans who earn as little as $104,425 per year.

The bill, which Baucus introduced Thursday, would fulfill many of President Barack Obama’s promised tax changes, including making most of the tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush permanent while raising taxes on Americans making more than $250,000 per year.

But those making more than $250,000 per year would not be the only ones to see their taxes go up if Baucus’s bill becomes.

The proposed legislation would raise the rates on the top two income brackets, from the current levels of 33 percent and 35 percent respectively, to 36 percent and 39.6 percent. The new rates would become effective after 2010.

The increase in the rates for these two brackets will affect all taxpayers who fall into these two brackets regardless of their filing status, according to Heritage Foundation Senior Policy Analyst Curtis Dubay, who reviewed the legislation.

That means some taxpayers earning as little as $104,425—far less than half the $250,000 threshold President Obama set for raising income taxes—would see their income tax rate increased.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend,.........
1 posted on 04/01/2009 9:18:07 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Another Obama lie. Shocking!


2 posted on 04/01/2009 9:19:10 AM PDT by jpl (Help us Obambi Wan Kenobi, you're our only dope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We are 40 years past time to tar, feather and jail the criminal class running Washington DC.


3 posted on 04/01/2009 9:20:22 AM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, somebody had best tell Obamabi about this!


4 posted on 04/01/2009 9:20:33 AM PDT by CodeToad (Anyone wanting the government to take over medical care should stand in line at the post office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How do these people sleep at night? Especially with both eyes closed.


5 posted on 04/01/2009 9:20:58 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

the tobacco tax hit today... but poor people don’t smoke I guess


6 posted on 04/01/2009 9:21:25 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
That means some taxpayers earning as little as $104,425—far less than half the $250,000 threshold President Obama set for raising income taxes—would see their income tax rate increased.

What this means is that Obama would not sign the bill increasing the tax. </sarcasm>

Fat chance

7 posted on 04/01/2009 9:22:22 AM PDT by chainsaw (If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -- P.J..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I know people who make over $104,000 per year and they work very, very, very, VERY hard for their money! In fact, they’ve worked hard all their lives to get to that level of pay.

And now the government wants to “punish” them for their hard work and give their money to people who sit on their butts and don’t work at all!

What’s “Dear Leader” going to do next, ignite a Cultural Revolution, deploy the Red Guards and have them drag “the rich” out into the streets???


8 posted on 04/01/2009 9:23:12 AM PDT by wk4bush2004 (SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

actually, it’s “spend and tax, spend and tax.”


9 posted on 04/01/2009 9:23:21 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (I think we're gonna have another civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

BTTT


10 posted on 04/01/2009 9:24:35 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

People still don’t get it! Once the 2003 tax cuts expire at the end of 2010, all income levels with have higher federal income tax rates as the rates go back to the rates of the year 2000.


11 posted on 04/01/2009 9:25:49 AM PDT by avacado (Impeach the Teleprompter!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

[actually, it’s “spend and tax, spend and tax.”]

No, its “borrow, spend, and tax, borrow, spend, and tax, tax, tax”


12 posted on 04/01/2009 9:25:50 AM PDT by 43north (11.04.08: the day America committed voluntary suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Note to self: Keep TAXABLE and TRACEABLE income BELOW $105K this year. ;)


13 posted on 04/01/2009 9:26:06 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"taxpayers earning as little as $104,425"

This is Class Warfare against the Middle Class.

If the above number is "family income", that's a married, working couple, both making a bit more than $50k a year.

So who are these people?

Most of the people I know in that category are college-educated, generally over the age of 40, either professionals, self-employed, commission sales people, or entrepreneurs.

These are the people that the Democrats love to demonize as "Rich".

But, of course, it's a moot point, since taxes (in one form or another) are going to go up for most everyone. With the exception of a few favored classes, of course. Reparative Redistribution and Vote-Buying notwithstanding.

14 posted on 04/01/2009 9:27:08 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

How about “lie, cheat and steal?”


15 posted on 04/01/2009 9:27:56 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (I think we're gonna have another civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lormand

16 posted on 04/01/2009 9:29:43 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If all the tax rates were dropped, with the top rate lowered to the 28% level of the Reagan Era, the economy would quickly bounce back in months and the stock market would explode and return to the 13K+ range in no time.

Of course, the Obama objective isn't to see the economy recover as quickly as possible. ZerO`s goal is to increase spending, increase taxes, enlarge the welfare state and expand government. At the same time cut the defense budget.

Ho-hum.

17 posted on 04/01/2009 9:30:01 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Working hard for that $104K is the point. It’s not arbitrarily handed to them. It’s very likely tons of sacrifice to earn it.

Also.... $104K is not rich. Whether we’re talking 1 or 2 family incomes, it’s not like your about to parade your home in front of the cameras for the next episode of cribs.

Lastly... Dems will speak to this in terms of percentage changes to minimize the impact of this debacle. The message should be, a person earning $125K will now pay $4,375 more (3.5%). The Dems feel you should pay this because of all the necessary pork (oops ‘investments’) shoved into their stimu-porkuludget thingy.


18 posted on 04/01/2009 9:33:27 AM PDT by Made In The USA (Liberalism is a sign of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This will crush any hope of a recovery across the entire economic spectrum if they do this.

Especially among small business owners like myself.


19 posted on 04/01/2009 9:34:00 AM PDT by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The lower they go the bigger the chance of a backlash.


20 posted on 04/01/2009 9:34:17 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson