Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solving the Problem of Childhood Obesity - Guess what? There's a one-ingredient recipe for...
Reason ^ | March 31, 2009 | Baylen Linnekin

Posted on 04/01/2009 4:02:06 PM PDT by neverdem

Guess what? There's a one-ingredient recipe for healthier kids

We’re fat. Really fat. And it’s not just us—it’s our kids, too. Have you seen them? They’re enormous.

According to the mantra of obesity experts, however, it’s much like Robin Williams (correctly) told Matt Damon in Good Will Hunting: It’s not your fault.

No, it’s not your fault, it’s not our fault, it’s not their fault. Unless “they” are restaurateurs, in which case it is their fault. That’s especially true for chain restaurants—the ones selling McAnything, blooming onions, and the like. They’re killing us by the greasy mouthful.

And because it’s their fault, these restaurateurs, we must give them their due regulatory dickens. Help is here, America. Trans fat bans. Menu-labeling here, there, and everywhere. More help is on the way, too. Caffeine and sugar and salt be gone. It’s for the children.

In some alternate universe, one that actually assigns blame to deserving people, it might be your fault, not theirs. Maybe it is your fault your kids are fat, since you feed them. Maybe the food that parents supply to their kids—and demand restaurants feed their kids—is making the kids fat. Which means parents need to do a better job of making sure their own kids eat healthy, and get some exercise.

Wouldn’t that be a refreshing message?

Cornell University marketing professor Brian Wansink, who heads the school’s Food and Brand Lab and served in the George W. Bush administration as executive director of the USDA’s Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, is not in the blame business. He’s an Ig Nobel-winning researcher, author of 2006’s Mindless Eating, and has been called “one of the world's leading authorities on consumer behavior.” Though he doesn’t point fingers, Wansink’s latest data suggests that our national fixation on blaming the restaurant industry for childhood obesity is misguided.

That conclusion comes from “The Joy of Cooking Too Much,” a study co-authored by Wansink and published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. In carrying out his research, Wansink and co-author Collin Payne, assistant professor of marketing at New Mexico State University-Las Cruces, relied on the simple premise that people tend to eat about two out of every three meals at home.

To learn whether home cooking might be a chief culprit behind America’s portliness, Wansink and Payne pored over seven decades of The Joy of Cooking, one of America’s most popular and durable cookbooks. After identifying recipes for 18 foods that had appeared in each edition of the book, the authors examined the calorie counts and serving sizes for those food over the years.

“If you look at all the common recipes, their calories and serving sizes, there’s about a 43% increase,” Wansink told Reason. “About two-thirds can be attributed to ingredients—more butter, more sugar, more use of sauces, nuts, and raisins—but the other third can be attributed to increases in portion size.

“The same pie that was to be cut in eight pieces in 1937? The Joy of Cooking now recommends you cut it into 6 pieces.”

Sounds perfectly sensible. But aren’t cookbooks just responding to increased restaurant portion sizes, thus putting the blame back on restaurateurs? Not quite. “A lot of the increases in calorie and serving sizes we started seeing in cookbooks before we saw them in restaurants,” Wansink said. “Our penchant for larger servings started in the home and then moved to the restaurant.”

But how might Wansink’s argument go over with parents—and other food and nutrition experts? That his book Mindless Eating earned kudos from such divergent sources as John Stossel, who featured Wansink’s work on 20/20, and the holy trinity of unholy food nannies—Marion Nestle, Kelly Brownell, and the Center for Science in the Public Interest—showed reason for hope.

Last month Wansink sat on a panel on ways to raise a healthy eater

At the annual South Beach Wine & Food Festival in Miami Beach last month, Wansink sat on a panel entitled Beyond Chicken Nuggets: How to Raise a Healthy Eater. In addition to Wansink, the panel featured food celebrities Rachael Ray and Tom Colicchio, South Beach Diet inventor Dr. Arthur Agatston, cookbook author (and wife of comedian Jerry Seinfeld) Jessica Seinfeld, and moderator Tara Parker-Pope, wellness columnist for The New York Times.

On its face, a panel featuring a daytime talk-show host, high-end restaurateur and head judge on Bravo’s hit Top Chef, diet-book author, uber-rich foodie mom, and New York Times writer wouldn’t appear to pose any danger to the restaurants-make-us-fat myth. (This year’s panel at least had better myth-busting potential than last year’s, which featured celebrity chefs—and torrid food nannies—Jamie Oliver and Alice Waters.)

But the overwhelming message of the panel was that parents—not the government or restaurants—are ultimately responsible for what their kids eat.

“We have to take some responsibility for the foods we bring into the home,” said Parker-Pope.

Taking responsibility often means, in the context of home cooking and lunch-sack packing, a healthy serving of chicanery.

“I advocate lying to children,” Parker-Pope declared.

Lying might mean mixing whole-wheat pasta in with white-wheat pasta, declared the chipper Ray, in a husky Kathleen Turner voice.

But lying isn’t the only solution. Colicchio advocated cooking with kids, giving them a stake in the meal. And though Wansink has launched a new project that nudges children to make healthier lunchroom choices, he’s also a father of two daughters, ages 2 and 4, who openly feeds his kids an eclectic mix of foods: “They’re lovers of sushi, vegetables—especially broccoli—foie gras, Diet Coke (when they can steal a sip from me), and McDonald’s cheeseburgers and French fries.”

Regardless of whether kids love healthy foods or not, argued Colicchio, parents are the gatekeepers to a healthy diet, and must be firm with kids. “If some blob of a thing was sitting on the ground, and you saw your kid pick it up and go to eat it, you’d say, ‘No!’” Colicchio said. “And so it’s just a matter of thinking about what we’re eating and sometimes, just saying, ‘No. We’re not going to do that.’”

But Colicchio made it clear that this choice is the parent’s alone.

“There’s a big discussion in some circles, with the Obamas coming in, about getting the nation to eat better,” Colicchio said. “But we can’t have a bunch of elitist chefs getting preachy and telling the country what they should eat. Fast food is here to stay. But we’ve got to get fast food makers to understand that there’s healthy food out there, and the only way they’re going to survive is if they make healthy fast food.”

Still, fast food makers have tried time and again to offer healthier foods, with mostly dismal results. Remember the McVeggie Burger? Regional fast-food chains that boasted fewer calories and less fat, like O’Naturals in Boston, never saw their dreams of vast expansion realized. Why?

One reason is that building a better—or healthier—McNugget isn’t easy. Seinfeld, for one, must know this. Her deceptively delicious chicken nugget recipe—which features healthy ingredients like flaxseed and pureed broccoli—met withering parental criticism at one popular recipe website.

But what about those menu-labeling and trans fat bans? Aren’t those efforts making kids healthier? Again, Wansink says the data doesn’t support that conclusion. “They’ve either been ineffective or disturbingly counterproductive,” he says. “All the data we’ve seen about menu labeling doesn’t show a consistent answer at all.

“Trying to change capitalism is a lot of work,” he adds, “and it won’t work.”

Obesity lawsuits aren’t the answer either, says Wansink.

“If we believe it’s a restaurant that’s made our kids fat, we’re not going to change, because it’s their fault,” he says. “We’re not going to arrest the control we do have as parents. We have the perfect justification: it’s not our fault. That’s where it really becomes dangerous. These suits obscure the difference we can make in our own lives right now.”

That difference starts and ends with parents. If this panel’s all-star cast can agree that parents hold the key to their own kids’ healthy eating, then the debate over childhood obesity might just be entering a healthy new chapter.

Baylen Linnekin is a writer living in Washington, D.C. He blogs at Crispy on the Outside.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: health; medicine; obesity; responsibility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: brytlea

I loved WW but wanted to loose weight fast so I went on South Beach and since 2/23 I’ve lost about 12 pounds. I also only have vino once a week compared to almost every night....a lot less sugar.


21 posted on 04/01/2009 4:26:00 PM PDT by geege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

This is so true. I was reading an article yesterday about how a seared scallop salad at Macaroni Grill has...wait for it...97 grams of fat! And of course, this is not isolated. Salads can be some of the biggest “hidden fats” out there, because people think “salad=healthy”, like as long as it’s in a bowl and some veggies are present it’s good for you.


22 posted on 04/01/2009 4:27:19 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: geege

I low carbed for many years, very successfully, and now, suddenly it’s not working. So, I’ve gone back to the old fashioned way, counting calories (which is basically what weight watchers is). If I can get my weight down I plan to go back to a low carb lifestyle because I prefer it.


23 posted on 04/01/2009 4:27:58 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

Really—I see people fool themselves all the time. The other day, tho, I was at Starbucks and thought I would have a scone. I knew it would be quite a few points, but I had not used any Flexpoints for the week. Turned out it was NINE points! That is almost half my daily allotment! Sheesh. I find I just do better if I eat at home. I’ve lost about 12 lbs since the end of January. Not extremely fast, but I feel good and not too deprived.


24 posted on 04/01/2009 4:29:47 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
Everything you write is true, but I don't think people are fat these days on account of salad dressing. Food didn't used to be available 24/7, but now it is. The more difficult your life is hour-by-hour, the more likely you will be to seek pleasure in eating. I'd bet a million bucks that any “poor” neighborhood in a U.S. city where people are fat today, will have fat residents twenty years from now...no matter how many government sponsored anti-obesity programs there are. Conservatives and libertarians should NOT jump on board the anti-obesity bandwagon.
25 posted on 04/01/2009 4:30:38 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yes, and evil guns will kill people if you don’t watch them closely. Evil SUVs will mow down entire villages if not restricted. Evil forks will blow you up like a balloon if you don’t corral them!


26 posted on 04/01/2009 4:32:13 PM PDT by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

I miss the WW Key Lime Pie Dessert!!!!!! And pizza....But I do like the way my jeans fit so I’ll stick with it till I can “squeeze” into my size 6 shorts for the summer...Good luck.


27 posted on 04/01/2009 4:32:17 PM PDT by geege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I guess none of these guys ever heard of “Go outside and play, and don’t come back in until I call you!” Nobody ever heard of putting the tv in the dumpster? Just NOT getting those video game players (trust me...kids do not die from this kind of deprivation), or simply not bringing home the crappy, ersatz food that turns them into porkers? Guess these people are all too young to remember the days before “convenience” foods. Nobody ever asks why grandma and grandpa were never fat as children.


28 posted on 04/01/2009 4:32:44 PM PDT by redhead (Don't look at ME! I voted for SARAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby

Don’t forget that the libs let the perverts loose, so we can’t let them go out and play, either.


29 posted on 04/01/2009 4:33:15 PM PDT by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Google Great American Land and Cattle Company. Order some of their seasoning. Put it on meat, chicken, veggies, fish, everything you cook. Makes everything taste great. If you ever get within 200 miles of El Paso, Tx go to their restaurant for the best steak you have ever tasted.


30 posted on 04/01/2009 4:34:00 PM PDT by csmusaret (You can't spell Democrat without R-A-T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Hell, RECESS is banned - teachers don’t want playground duty, so they cut it out!


31 posted on 04/01/2009 4:34:21 PM PDT by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Good for you, glad you are doing well. :)


32 posted on 04/01/2009 4:34:24 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: geege

Thanks, I don’t think I’ll ever get into shorts again! But, I’d like to be able to wear jeans and feel sort of normal!


33 posted on 04/01/2009 4:36:14 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

I agree, and I’m not jumping on an obesity bandwagon, only pointing out that people should use some common sense whether it’s salad dressing, oil, butter, or whatever if their goal is to control their weight.


34 posted on 04/01/2009 4:37:25 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom

Well when my kids were little they were out all day long, stayed out until I called them in.....all parents kept an eye on the kids no matter what part of the neighborhood they were in, parents even yelled at kids and didn’t get sued. We all have fenced in yards in my neighborhood, there’s no excuse for kids to be in the house these days, parents need to get off thier butts and go outside with the kids, play ball, go to the park, take a walk around the block, family things, no excuse for kids to be fat, not today, not any day.


35 posted on 04/01/2009 4:38:00 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are soooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

I’ll keep it in mind if I’m ever in Texas.


36 posted on 04/01/2009 4:40:41 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

Well, I’d do much better if I would jog or something! hehehe


37 posted on 04/01/2009 4:41:34 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Well back in 2000 I followed WW exactly and got down to about 124 lbs......I also walked back then about 6 miles a day.


38 posted on 04/01/2009 4:42:07 PM PDT by geege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s all calories consumed versus calories burned. A big part of succeeding at that is accepting that while it’s pleasurable to eat, it’s not a good idea to use food as entertainment.


39 posted on 04/01/2009 4:44:02 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I watched that “Supersize Me” documentary, and it made me sick. Wall to wall corporate-bashing and denial of personal responsibility.

You know what, if you give people enough freedom, they’ll hang themselves. There’s no lack of healthy food out there. And more importantly, there’s no lack of food marketed as healthy. How many boxes are now labeled “fat free,” “zero trans fat,” “heart healthy,” “lean,” and on and on. Obviously, the marketing gurus have responded to the outcry for healthier options. Now that the options are here (as if they weren’t before, lurking in the produce section, far away from the candy/pop/cereal/ice cream aisles), not much has changed on the obesity front.

Whether or not they’re actually that healthy isn’t the point. The point is, we’re being supplied with “healthy” food. We’re being induced by big business to buy healthy food. And still we’re fat. Why? Because bad food tastes good. People will continue to choose what’s bad for them. Evolution has screwed us.


40 posted on 04/01/2009 4:51:27 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson