Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer: Accused Nazi Prison Guard to Be Deported Sunday (John Demjanjuk)
Washington Post ^ | 4/2/09 | Craig Whitlock

Posted on 04/02/2009 12:11:39 PM PDT by nickcarraway

An accused Nazi concentration camp guard living in Ohio will be deported Sunday to stand trial on murder charges in Munich, according to the German Justice Ministry.

John Demjanjuk, 88, a native of Ukraine who emigrated to the United States in 1952, is scheduled to arrive in Munich on a commercial flight Monday morning, said Guenter Maull, a defense lawyer representing him in Germany.

After a long investigation, a Munich court issued an arrest warrant last month for Demjanjuk, considered by Nazi hunters to be one of their most important remaining targets from World War II. He is wanted on 29,000 counts of accessory to murder for his actions as a prison guard at the Sobibor death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland in 1943.

Demjanjuk will be imprisoned immediately in Munich and undergo medical examinations to determine if he is fit to stand trial, Maull said. He said Demjanjuk suffers from early-stage leukemia, kidney problems and rheumatism.

"He's an old man, a very sick and old man," Maull said in a telephone interview. ad_icon

Demjanjuk's family has said he is too frail to make the trip to Germany, let alone endure a lengthy murder trial. But the U.S. Department of Justice turned down a request to allow him to remain in the United States on humanitarian grounds, his lawyer said. He will be accompanied on the flight to Munich by a doctor, nurse and a U.S. law-enforcement official, Maull said.

Ulrich Staudigl, a spokesman for the German Justice Ministry, confirmed Demjanjuk's pending deportation. Laura Sweeney, a U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman, declined to

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Germany
KEYWORDS: germany; nazi; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2009 12:11:39 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

2 posted on 04/02/2009 12:13:50 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

A factor in this case that has gotten little attention.

Liberals say the purpose of imprisonment is to rehabilitate. In this case, the defendant apparently rehabilitated himself, as by all accounts he lived a blameless life for well over 40 years after coming to this country. This is exactly the argument used for leniency for people like Ayers.

That is assuming, BTW, that this guy is indeed the person he is accused of being, which is by no means certain.

Anyway, what is liberals’ philosophical basis for tormenting the final years of a sick man in his 80s over crimes purportedly committed 60 years ago and which he quite obviously rehabilitated himself from?


3 posted on 04/02/2009 12:20:14 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Whether he lives through the trial or not, he still will be judged at the Great White Throne. Even a great lawyer can't spring him from that one.
4 posted on 04/02/2009 12:22:18 PM PDT by fish hawk (The Golden Calf you worship will not bail you out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

You’re right.

We should put a bullet in the back of his head so he’s out of his misery.


5 posted on 04/02/2009 12:26:38 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

That is an excellent question indeed! Liberals have succeeded at convincing many, many people that punishment is somehow an outdated concept. This example should immediately refute that idiotic notion in the eyes of most sane people.


6 posted on 04/02/2009 12:31:46 PM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I heard that Zero was devastated. He had a position lined up for this guy and everything.


7 posted on 04/02/2009 12:36:27 PM PDT by WingsofCourage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

My post was not with regard to whether this particular guy is guilty or not. Although an unbiased person might reasonably conclude that the prosecution is out of organizational pique that its original claim that he was “Ivan the Terrible,” a particularly brutal camp guard, was comprehensively disproven.

He is now accused of being a different camp guard, apparently just a random low-level guard accused of no particularly unusual level of brutality. I found it fascinating that a US Court had ruled the government’s case was proven at least partially because this guy could not prove where he spent the war. I thought the government had to prove its case, not the accused disprove it.

Was service as a camp guard truly voluntary? Could one refuse to serve, or quit and walk away? Or would that get one shot or tossed into the camp himself?

One also wonders how many thousands of Commie camp guards are retired living on their pensions, or still in power. ASAIK, only Cambodia has prosecuted its camp guards and their masters.


8 posted on 04/02/2009 12:36:36 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The question then is, what amount of time with a person not re-offending is adequate to demonstrate their rehabilitation? 1,5,10 years? Do the nature of the crimes have an impact? If I smoked pot 10 years ago am I OK? If I was a Nazi death camp guard 40 years ago instead of 60?
9 posted on 04/02/2009 12:41:32 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“One also wonders how many thousands of Commie camp guards are retired living on their pensions, or still in power.”

Sure. They should be killed, too.

But you eat an elephant one bite at a time.


10 posted on 04/02/2009 12:44:04 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Their philosophical basis is that they believe the legal system can achieve a state of cosmic justice; they can sit like gods over the lives of all, determining who is righteous and who is not, administering appropriate rewards or punishments for each. The capriciousness whereby their judgments affect some but not others never seems to bother them. Many Russian - and let’s be honest - American soldiers who did things just as horrifying will never face such ‘justice’, nor should they. The courts’ function is to preserve society from the excesses of human behavior, not take on the impossible task of setting all wrongs to right.


11 posted on 04/02/2009 12:44:17 PM PDT by eclecticEel (I already have a Messiah, I don't need another one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Liberals may say that, but prison serves to detain, punish AND rehabilitate (as a last resort). Until the weasely 1900s, prisons offered nothing in the way of rehabilitation, other than the fear of further imprisonment. We only added “rehabilitation” to make ourselves feel better about the whole thing.

If he’s guilty, the punishment part works for me.
Especially if he dies in prison.


12 posted on 04/02/2009 12:44:18 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Was war service truly voluntary? Could one refuse to serve, or quit and walk away?

A very important series of questions. I do not have documentation but I understand one could refuse. They would then be drafted to serve on the Russian front.

One is inclined to surmise here. What of Merkel and company? Oh yes, I do suppose if THEY had been alive or past infancy, in WW2, they would have been dragged kicking and screaming by the Gestapo. They would have stood virtually alone.

Yep, heroes all. (sarc). Post WW2, they now stand up for justice. How easy!

13 posted on 04/02/2009 12:46:02 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stormer

There is an astonishing amount of cynicism and hypocrisy in this prosecution.

Germany has requested his deportation to for trial, although Germany will not allow its own citizens to be deported for trial on Nazi charges in other countries. If he had been resident in Germany all this time, he could not be prosecuted, as their statute of limitations has expired.


14 posted on 04/02/2009 12:46:39 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Anyway, what is liberals’ philosophical basis for tormenting the final years of a sick man in his 80s over crimes purportedly committed 60 years ago and which he quite obviously rehabilitated himself from?

No statute of limitations on being politically incorrect. He should have been a NKVD gulag guard.

15 posted on 04/02/2009 12:48:20 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I suspect that in this case Israeli justice is going to prove itself infinitely superior to Eurotrash justice....


16 posted on 04/02/2009 12:49:29 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
Many Russian - and let’s be honest - American soldiers who did things just as horrifying will never face such ‘justice’, nor should they.

AFAIK, nobody has presented evidence this guy personally did anything particularly horrifying. If he's guilty as charged, he was a perimeter guard at a camp, with little or no direct contact with prisoners.

He's charged with being a member of a criminal organization (the SS) and therefore is being held partially responsible for all its acts.

I just wish the same standard could be applied for the 100M+ murder victims of Communism, roughly eight times as many as the victims of the Nazis.

17 posted on 04/02/2009 12:49:51 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I found it fascinating that a US Court had ruled the government’s case was proven at least partially because this guy could not prove where he spent the war. I thought the government had to prove its case, not the accused disprove it.

They have, the government has demonstrated in three different trials that he was an SS member who served at Trawniki, Treblinka, Sobibór, Majdanek and Flossenburg, based on both witness’ and documentary evidence. Yes, some of it from the Soviets, which is what cast doubt on his role as Ivan the Terrible. The fact that he has no credible alternative simply supports that.

Was service as a camp guard truly voluntary? Could one refuse to serve, or quit and walk away? Or would that get one shot or tossed into the camp himself?

In general yes, one volunteered for the SS. In Demjanjuk’s case, he was in the Red Army, was captured, and was one of a few thousand Soviet prisoners who volunteered to join the SS. He knew exactly what he was doing.

One also wonders how many thousands of Commie camp guards are retired living on their pensions, or still in power. ASAIK, only Cambodia has prosecuted its camp guards and their masters.

Simple, Russia doesn’t consider them criminals.

As a matter of curiosity, what sort or statute of limitations would you advocate for crimes like murder or attempted murder? Entering the country illegally? Obtaining citizenship illegally?

18 posted on 04/02/2009 12:52:06 PM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

You wrote:

“But you eat an elephant one bite at a time.”

Apparently communist guards are never on the menu in the Western world these days.

I wonder how 60 year old elephant tastes?


19 posted on 04/02/2009 12:53:32 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

” being a member of a criminal organization (the SS) and therefore is being held partially responsible for all its acts.” Do you mean like the U.S. Congress?


20 posted on 04/02/2009 12:57:18 PM PDT by Apercu ("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson