Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dept. of Homeland Defense Threatens Employees (VANITY)
Family Member | April 15th, 2009 | Mathews

Posted on 04/15/2009 6:15:44 AM PDT by Mathews

I have a family member who works for Homeland Defense. Word came down yesterday that any employee or contractor caught at a tea party would face severe reprocussions. Has anyone else heard a similar account?


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: democrats; dhs; fascism; homelandsecurity; teaparty; threats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2009 6:15:44 AM PDT by Mathews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mathews

No..but please post more info if you get it nailed down.


2 posted on 04/15/2009 6:19:01 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

How did the word come down. Names, e mail or memo are required to substantiate this claim.

If there is a leftist making such a stand, they must be exposed.


3 posted on 04/15/2009 6:19:19 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

I wish he/she would copy it and send it to you (blacking out the name and addy, of course.) Would love to see that plastered. ;-)


4 posted on 04/15/2009 6:20:17 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The smallest minority on earth is the 'individual'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Never heard of a “Department of Homeland Defense”.


5 posted on 04/15/2009 6:20:17 AM PDT by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Well, there may be individuals in Homeland Security who may say that on their own, but it may not be official policy. However, if it is official policy, then it will be written down somewhere and it will be documented.

So, have this “relative” (whomever it is) supply the official documentation and scan it and present it for us...

This will be all the evidence that we or anyone else needs to verify this.


6 posted on 04/15/2009 6:20:58 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

I would be shocked if a federal entity was that in touch with current events.


7 posted on 04/15/2009 6:21:33 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

I encourage them to get said directive in writing/email/photocopy. In addition to that and/or failing that, they should contact a whistleblower/ombudsman. When contacting anyone on the issue, they should cc themselves to their private email address so there *will* be a electronic trail of all inquiries and responses.


8 posted on 04/15/2009 6:21:35 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

To say it another way, you are probably dealing with a single individual (or maybe others, too) who are saying this on their own, according to their own political motives and persuasions and it does not reflect the policy of Homeland Security...


9 posted on 04/15/2009 6:22:43 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

I encourage them to get said directive in writing/email/photocopy. In addition to that and/or failing that, they should contact a whistleblower/ombudsman. When contacting anyone on the issue, they should cc themselves to their private email address so there *will* be a electronic trail of all inquiries and responses.


10 posted on 04/15/2009 6:22:48 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

I’m sure they did not leave a paper trail. It was probably a voice warning starting at the top and working it’s way down.


11 posted on 04/15/2009 6:22:57 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Smiling Fascists


12 posted on 04/15/2009 6:22:57 AM PDT by philly-d-kidder (Gloria in Excelsis DEO!................ Glory to GOD in the Highest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

You are correct... I meant DHS.


13 posted on 04/15/2009 6:25:02 AM PDT by Mathews (Ambition, absent a moral compass, is naked destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

If this person is supposed to be working, and instead attends a tea party, I can understand why that would be a problem, just as I would not skip work to go to the library or register to vote. If the person has the day off, they are free to participate in such a gathering if they so desire. DHS would have a nice lawsuit on its hands if it attempted to interfere with an employee’s legal off-duty activities. There is not enough info in this posting to determine exactly what happened.


14 posted on 04/15/2009 6:25:30 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Dept of Homeland Security.


15 posted on 04/15/2009 6:26:59 AM PDT by Mathews (Ambition, absent a moral compass, is naked destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

That was my thing as well. Take a day of vacation, or a couple of hours vacation if you place work that way. Attend the party on your time. I wanted to attend the one here but I have to work, and going in my uniform is frowned upon.


16 posted on 04/15/2009 6:31:35 AM PDT by DYngbld (I have read the back of the Book and we WIN!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Homeland Defense?

Methinks your relative is lying to you and actually lives in a van down by the river.


17 posted on 04/15/2009 6:32:29 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Dictator Obamba!!!!


18 posted on 04/15/2009 6:33:32 AM PDT by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd,you get no further than the crowd")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

Please don’t consider this a flame, but a posting hearsay really isn’t helpful.


19 posted on 04/15/2009 6:41:50 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson