Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 bond holders drop opposition to Chrysler plan (Very Bad News!)
AP ^ | 5/8/2009 18 minutes ago

Posted on 05/08/2009 7:39:20 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies

Two of Chrysler's dissident bond holders say they're dropping their opposition to the automaker's proposed restructuring plan.

OppenheimerFunds and Stairway Capital Management say the group opposing the plan just got too small to be effective.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; chrysler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2009 7:39:20 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Any bets this is the product of more Obama admin threats?
2 posted on 05/08/2009 7:41:08 AM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
And if they drop their opposition to the plan, you can just bet that any criminal complaints about Obama extortion on Chrysler's bondholders will disappear too.
3 posted on 05/08/2009 7:48:46 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I hope someone with standing opposes this move.


4 posted on 05/08/2009 7:49:38 AM PDT by texmexis best (uency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The Shareholders are going to sue their asses off.


5 posted on 05/08/2009 7:50:38 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

he is just trying to help the oppressed.//sarc
Why people are not completely outraged by this i beyond me. No difference between this and a gang of hoodlums shaking down a candy store.


6 posted on 05/08/2009 7:52:24 AM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
"I hope someone with standing opposes this move."

You mean, someone with the nads, don't you?
7 posted on 05/08/2009 7:53:06 AM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I wonder if they dropped their complaint with the full knowledge that they will be the subject of their investors lawsuits alleging breach of fiduciary responsibility.

If they dropped their complaint because of duress from the Administration, it will come out in the trial and the focus will shift to the Administration.

8 posted on 05/08/2009 7:54:31 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mentor2k

“”I hope someone with standing opposes this move.”

You mean, someone with the nads, don’t you? “

Someone who has the nads, is willing to go jail or who has the deep pockets to extend any law suits into the next Republican administration, which is coming soon.


9 posted on 05/08/2009 7:56:20 AM PDT by texmexis best (uency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: genghis
For what it's worth, I work with a department full of liberals. When Obama was elected they were elated and sang his praises. Now they don't even fight back when I point out each passing problem with Obama and some are now agreeing with me.
10 posted on 05/08/2009 7:57:10 AM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Chrysler is privately held.


11 posted on 05/08/2009 7:57:59 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The Shareholders are going to sue their asses off.

I completely agree...and I think this whole affair is going to be required to be unraveled.

This matter not only threatens the contract that senior lenders have with borrowers, it also threatens that part of contract law that says that contracts entered into under duress are null and void.

12 posted on 05/08/2009 7:58:42 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Then make that unit holders of a bond fund.


13 posted on 05/08/2009 7:59:54 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Chrysler is privately held.

Oppenheimer however is not. Anyone who holds an Oppenheimer Bond Fund will very soon be a participant in a Class Action suit. Mark my words.

L

14 posted on 05/08/2009 8:00:39 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Oppenheimer was threatened by Grandholm that if they didn't drop their opposition Michigan would never do business with them. If I were a bondholder I would sue.
15 posted on 05/08/2009 8:04:53 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

From your mouth to God’s ear.


16 posted on 05/08/2009 8:13:53 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Their families have been threatened by Chicago brand political thugs.


17 posted on 05/08/2009 8:23:35 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Arlene Sphincter epitomizes everything rotten about career politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

This is what happens in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy law allows for cramdowns, even of secured creditors.


18 posted on 05/08/2009 8:24:56 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I would think as a investor in Oppenheimer, I would have standing in this. Since they are abrogating their fiduciary responsibility TO ME, I wonder if a class action suit could be filed and include Oppenheimer, Chrysler, Geithner and the O as defendants. Think I’ll give my broker a call.


19 posted on 05/08/2009 8:30:24 AM PDT by offduty (Joe Biden is still looking for the video tape of FDR's address to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

They dropped their opposition because Judge Gonzales ruled yesterday that Chrysler could begin selling off its assets at auction now (with Fiat/New Chrysler being the only bidder) “in the interest of time.”

That decision effectively eliminates the assets that secured the loans with the Non-TARP lenders leaving them with the possibility of getting far less than the 29 cents on the dollar that Obama originally offered them.

The whole reason they refused Obama in the first place was because they thought that they could do better in bankruptcy court as secured lenders with first priority. With the secured assets being sold off (unconstitutionally & against bankruptcy law), they are forced to accept what he offered or maybe get far less.

This is one of the most egregious acts I have EVER seen.


20 posted on 05/08/2009 8:35:12 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson