Posted on 05/09/2009 7:10:56 AM PDT by IbJensen
Speaking extensively to reporters for the first time since a celibacy scandal broke, the Rev. Alberto Cutié said he is considering marriage and a family.
After confessing his love for the mystery woman he was caught with on a South Florida beach, the Rev. Alberto Cutié says he is ready to consider taking the relationship to the next level.
Marriage and children are a definite possibility, he told The Miami Herald late Friday.
''I'm not going to rush into marriage. I know all about that,'' said the man who has counseled countless couples preparing for weddings. ``But I would like to have a family and at the same time serve God.''
Does that mean he will leave the priesthood?
''My struggle has gone on for close to a year. It wasn't a matter of if, it was a matter of when,'' he said. ``You cannot be a married priest in the Roman Catholic Church. I have friends -- Episcopalian bishops, Baptists, friends in the American Bible Society -- and they have shown me that it is possible to do both.''
Cutié said he finally broke his silence Friday, speaking first to Univisión co-anchor Teresa Rodriguez, because he wanted to protect his girlfriend. She has been identified in media reports as Ruhama Buni Canellis, 35, a divorced mother living in Miami Beach. Cutié would not confirm her name, saying he wanted to protect her privacy and noting she is not a public figure.
''There have been so many rumors, and the paparazzi outside her door,'' Cutié said. He added that he's sure he wasn't set up by his girlfriend or anybody else, as many have speculated, when he ended up in a liplock -- and worse -- in the pages of the Mexican magazine TVnotas. ``People have gone as far as to say that I set it up. That would really be stupid. I didn't set it up and she didn't either.''
Earlier Friday, Cutié told Rodriguez he has few regrets about engaging in the relationship, even though the romance has jeopardized his mediagenic career.
''Do I feel bad, horrible, about it? . . . No,'' he said emphatically during the televised interview, adding: ``I will never say I'm sorry for loving a woman.''
The interview, excerpts of which were broadcast Friday evening, comprised the first extensive public comments from Cutié since the scandal over the illicit liaison exploded on Tuesday.
Univisión's viewers nationwide were treated to the unusual sight of a beloved Catholic priest, in his clerical collar and black suit, confessing his love for a woman to the world.
Cutié, 40, made it plain he was not seeking absolution, even though he did say he felt sorry to have hurt and disappointed God and his followers, and worried about the consequences of breaking his vow of celibacy.
''I can say, sincerely, that she's a woman I love,'' he said in Spanish, noting he had known the woman for nearly 10 years. He first saw her in church, Cutié said.
''From the moment I saw her, I knew I liked her,'' he said. He did not specify when the romantic relationship began.
He did not discuss the relationship in any detail in the excerpts broadcast Friday. The full interview will be broadcast Tuesday night at 10.
The Archdiocese of Miami had no reaction to the interview. ''No further comment,'' spokeswoman Mary Ross Agosta said.
Cutié is scheduled to appear on CBS' The Early Show at 7 a.m. Monday. Early Show co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez, a former anchor at Miami's WFOR-CBS 4, will do the interview.
Canellis, meanwhile, issued a statement Friday afternoon pleading with the media to leave her alone, but she did not disclose the nature of her relationship with the priest.
''As a single mother, I ask that the members of the media respect my privacy and the privacy of my 14-year-old son,'' the statement said.
Canellis, originally from Guatemala, is a divorced mother with custody of her 14-year-old son, public records show.
She and her ex-husband, David Hope Norton, have been in and out of court dealing with child-support issues since the 1996 divorce.
Cutié was relieved on Tuesday of his duties at his parish church, St. Francis de Sales in South Beach, and at the Archdiocese of Miami's radio and television arm, which he oversaw.
In the Univisión interview, Cutié insisted the sabbatical was voluntary. In response to Rodriguez's remark about his wearing his collar, Cutié noted he remains a priest, and that even those who leave the church are still considered priests.
Cutié accepted blame for the scandal and acknowledged that in hindsight he might have handled the matter differently.
''I am the only one responsible for that,'' he said. ``It was never my intention to hurt anyone.''
He said he suspected photographers had caught the couple on the beach, which he said was a solitary spot north of Miami.
The controversy became public this week when Spanish-language magazine TVnotas published the compromising pictures. The magazine's cover showed the priest on his back in blue shorts with a long-brown-haired woman in a dark bathing suit wrapping her legs around him.
Public reaction to Cutié's removal from his parish and the published pictures, especially in South Florida, has been strong. Though many Catholics have expressed indignation, the scandal has prompted debate over the church's strict policy of celibacy for priests, with many people supporting the cleric and criticizing the church's stance.
On Friday night, after broadcast of the interview, a handful of people showed up outside Cutié's parish church to show their support for the embattled priest.
Virginia Londoño, who also attended a larger support rally Thursday, said she still believed after hearing his explanations that Cutié did nothing wrong. He still has the right to wear the collar, she said.
But Noemi Guzman, a Cutié supporter, said the priest erred in not publicly confessing sooner. ''The people would have accepted it better,'' she said.
Miami Archbishop John C. Favalora, in a prepared statement earlier this week, said Cutié violated the church's position on celibacy.
Experts in Canon Law, the internal rules of the Catholic Church, say it is extremely unlikely the archbishop will allow Cutié to stay an active priest while he is in a relationship.
Cutié told Univisión on Friday that he succumbed to human passion only after long efforts not to.
''I'm a man,'' he said. ``Under the cassock there are pants.
Ordained, married, Anglican Priests who convert and qualify to be ordained Catholic Priests are done so under Pope John Paul IIs 1980 Pastoral Provision. Ordained, married pastors from other protestant denominations who convert to Catholicism and seek ordination are ordained with a dispensation; issued by the Holy See, from the discipline of celibacy. In both instances, if the spouse precedes her husband in death then he must adopt the discipline of celibacy for the remainder of his life. That is a condition of ordination. Also, the total number of these ordinations, in the Latin Rite, is minuscule.
why,at least,are not Catholic men allowed to marry and *then* seek ordination with the understanding that they cannot be elevated to the office of Bishop and must,if their wife pre-deceases them,live a celibate life?
They can. 21 of the 22 Churches sui juris which comprise the Catholic Church ordain, as a norm, married men. The Latin Rite does not. If a man seeks both marriage and ordination, a man has options. Also, married men in the Latin Rite can be ordained as Deacons.
You wouldn't happen to be one of those suckers who helped line Dan Brown's wallet are you?
This would make a great movie. Maybe they could get Richard Chamberlain to play the lead.
"Have we not power to carry about a woman, a sister, as well as the rest of the apostles, and the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?" 1 Corinthians 9:5 (emphasis added for your edification)
"A woman, a sister. Some erroneous translators have corrupted this text by rendering it, a sister, a wife: whereas it is certain, St. Paul had no wife (chap. 7, ver. 7, 8) and that only he speaks of such devout women as, according to the custom of the Jewish nation, waited upon the preachers of the gospel and supplied them with necessaries." St. Jerome, commentary on 1 Corinthians 9:5, circa 400 AD.
“vile comments”
Since you posting to me, might I ask, What vile comments?”
As Christ said there are a lot of goats among the sheep.
Suggesting that some believe that Christ was married and had children is silly.
“Celibacy is a discipline. The Latin Rite prefers to adhere more closely to the teaching and examples of Christ, the Apostles and St. Paul. The 21 Churches in the Eastern Rites do not. Bishops are chosen exclusively from celibates in the Eastern Rite Churches and while the norm is to ordain married men, once ordained a single Priest may not then marry. Also, if the spouse of a Priest precedes him in death, he must then adopt the discipline of celibacy for the remainder of his life. “
OK, this makes my head hurt.
We don't share your assertion of *silliness* and believe it a relevant topic for discussion..
Oh for heaven's sake! Get a life!
LOL! Father Cutie? Sounds like an SNL skit. But his attitude toward his own sexual desires is very ‘European’. They think themselves so much more sophisticated about sexual matters than we silly Americans.
If one is not willing to abide by the teachings of the Catholic Church then by one's actions, one excommunicate one's self.
He clearly cannot possibly believe in the True Presence.
There are *some* that believe the earth is flat.
He sounds like a brave and caring soul and so do you.
My uncle recently died, in his youth he wanted to be a priest, but didn’t become one.
His entire life he was celibate, practiced poverty, and devoted himself to the church in ways that were inspirations to generations of Catholics he taught.
I can only assume they lowered the bar far enough so that someone with such little faith in himself and God could become a priest.
I’m sorry, I wasn’t specifically referring to you. You were the random reply post. And maybe vile isn’t the right word. But the underlying message is there. This man doesn’t expect to stay a Priest, does he? So why is this even a story?
That is your cross to bear.
It’s relevant only to the snakeoil salesmen who peddle the silliness and the suckers who enable them.
I have no problem with a Roman Catholic Priest who decides the calling he once accepted is after all not the calling he can honestly commit to, and in good faith, 1st resign and, afterward, seek a relationship he believes is honest and right for his life.
For me, it is not a matter of the historical rights or wrongs of the unmarried priesthood or the vows of celibacy.
It is the priest who has come to a “change”, and the honest course at this time is to leave the Roman Catholic priesthood, not demand the terms of Catholic priesthood be changed, to accommodate the “life style” he wants. This point is not a defense of or argument against the commitments that the Roman Catholic Church makes on its priests, but it is a point about this priests own lack of integrity going against his own vows, instead of leaving the priesthood beforehand on honest terms.
And besides, from the priest’s own comments, I am not sure how much of a committed Catholic he is, in that he seems to think it would be O.K. for him to serve as a priest in a denomination that does not have the same commitments as the Roman Catholic Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.