[theDentist]

No, I don’t think the windbag waited 2 minutes before issuing criticisms.

[Paladin2]

ManBearPig should’a waited for a couple of centuries.

[EDINVA]

If Al Gore and the Administration he served had been doing its job for eight years, the events that the Bush Administration had to defend against might not have occurred. So, Al .. STFU.

[willgolfforfood]

That's because he was home in his double-wide in Tennessee, curled up in the fetal position, gaining 100 lbs.

Al, we already know that took 2 years. It's not like we expected you to get that out of your system in only 100 days.

[Mind Freed]

Gore claimed he does not “want to get dragged into an argument with Dick Cheney about what he's getting into.”

Understandable Al... I wouldn't go look for an a$$ kicking either. Just go home, lock the door, and don't ever come out!

[eyedigress]

Yea...Like Bush was slamming Clintoon every day. Go away you self-gratifying jack-ass.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Running scared. They’re petrified of the man.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

So he's saying two years isn't bad to criticize an administration when the unwritten rule was, until recent times, that you kept your opinions to yourself forever on disagreements with your successors.

Democrats threw out the old rules and are now upset that anyone else can do the same.

[lilylangtree]

albore waited two years? No way Jose! He’s lying thru his teeth. Given that Bush Admin began in January 2001, albore still spoke up on the political scene.

Regarding Iraq:

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

[ADSUM]

Well! Gore still hasn’t said anything that makes sense or is worth listening to.

[lilylangtree]

Here’s another one—note the date:

Gore takes on Bush in first Florida political speech after election.
Chicago Tribune (via Knight-Ridder/Tribune NewsService) | April 13, 2002

[skeeter]

Al Gore needed those two years to build his Green Money Machine. Al Gore didn't need to respond to attacks by the Bush administration.

Al Gore is a bloviating buffoon.

[rjsimmon]

“I waited two years after I left office to make statements that were critical,” Gore said during an interview on CNN, pointing out that his critiques were focused on “policy.”

That is probably because it took you that long to realize that you were no longer IN office.

“Talk about somebody that shouldn't be talking about making the country less safe, invading a country that did not attack us and posed no serious threat to us at all,” Gore said of Cheney.

You mean, like Bosnia?

Gore identified Cheney as “the leading spokesman for his party” and said he suspects Cheney’s prominence is not welcomed by other Republicans

Pretty amazing. Ask 10 Democrats who the 'leading spokesman' for the Republicans happens to be, and you get 11 answers. One minute it is Rush, next it is Palin, yet another says Coulter or Rove. The ManBearPig says it is Cheney.

“I have a feeling that members of his own party wish that he would not do that,” Gore said. “But I'll let that be an argument between him and them.”

Right. That is why you are speaking up about it...

Despite the criticism, Gore claimed he does not “want to get dragged into an argument with Dick Cheney about what he's getting into.”

This is precisely what you wanted. Your 'Global Warming' meme is sinking faster than the Titanic and you are wanting the lime-light back.

[SDShack]

Here is what I posted on the Politico board:
“Talk about somebody that shouldn’t be talking about making the country less safe, invading a country that did not attack us and posed no serious threat to us at all,” Gore said of Cheney.

Memo to Al Gore - the Clinton/Gore Adiministration came up with the policy of Regime Change specifically in reference to Saddam Hussein and his refusual to account for WMD.

I guess Al Gore forgot all that. Just more revisionist history from typical liberal hyrpocrites.

[potlatch]

[BlueNgold]

Note to the geniuses at The Politico:
Al Gore is lying.
Feb 3, 2002 - New York Times - Gore criticizes Bush on economy.

Not quite 2 years - actually only 1 year and 2 weeks, but who’s counting, it kind of round up to 2 years.

So the nincompoop was out blaming President Bush for a recession less than 5 months after 9-11. I guess he missed the fact that some planes hit some buildings and bunch of innocent people died, and amazing damage was done to our financial system and our commercial airline industry.

But let’s take him at face value just for fun:
So in Feb 2002 we were in a recession. We seem to have gotten out of it back then - but how? What did we do to tax policy in 2002 I wonder... hmmm ... maybe someone can help me, I seem to be fuzzy on the details.
(Me to AlGore - “Lying Jerk”)

[Melchior]

Gore did not wait two years. In January 2002 he came out fighting in Nashville, announcing that he was creating a PAC for a new presidential campaign.

[bootless]

Gee, Al, no need to get snippy about it.

[Pistolshot]

“I waited two years after I left office to make statements that were critical,” Gore said

That's because you are as dumb as a box of rocks.

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

Algore “waited” 2 years (if true) primarily because he went off the deep end after LO-HOO-SING the presidential election in 2000 - I saw the 60 mins interview - sounds like the guy wsa Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs for a long time.