Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This guy speaks in language so plain, and often enough, humorous, that he just might get through to some government-educated youngsters enough to help them think in the principles of LIVE-AND-LET-LIVE.
1 posted on 05/20/2009 2:10:09 PM PDT by FreeKeys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FreeKeys; bamahead; dcwusmc; Bokababe
People try to argue that government isn’t really force. You believe that? Try not paying your taxes.....When they come to get you for not paying your taxes, try not going to court. Guns will be drawn. Government is force.

ping!

2 posted on 05/20/2009 2:12:45 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

Penn and Teller are the greatest show in Las Vegas. Well worth every penny.


3 posted on 05/20/2009 2:15:01 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys; bamahead

I believe I’m much more in agreement with Libertarians these days than with big government republicans.


4 posted on 05/20/2009 2:15:28 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

“I don’t know what would be best for anyone. I don’t even know what’s best for me.”

The maxim ‘Nothing but perfection’ may be spelled ‘p-a-r-a-l-y-s-i-s’: Churchill


5 posted on 05/20/2009 2:17:08 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

Well said. I wonder if Teller feels the same. ;)


6 posted on 05/20/2009 2:18:15 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Revolution Beckons......When is enough, ENOUGH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Penn Jillette will be on Fox News "Red Eye" tonight
(Also appearing: Newt Gingrich!)

7 posted on 05/20/2009 2:19:06 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

ping


8 posted on 05/20/2009 2:20:15 PM PDT by FreeKeys ("The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe." -- Dr. McCoy, Star Trek IV:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

“the principles of LIVE-AND-LET-LIVE”

Just who is against those principles? Could you please be specific, rather than create a faceless imaginary boogeyman like Meghan McCain does?

If you want societal acceptance of homos, leading to more & more teaching of the joys of sodomy to kids in school, then please say so. If you want legalized drugs, then please, say so.

A conservative inherantly believes in live and let live. What particularly causes you to use the caps lock there?


9 posted on 05/20/2009 2:21:19 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

He doesn’t speak for everyone, he claims. Teller doesn’t speak for anyone!


10 posted on 05/20/2009 2:23:21 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: windcliff; raven92876

ping


14 posted on 05/20/2009 2:27:14 PM PDT by stylecouncilor (The black man is keeping me down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
I know barely enough about Max Weber to type his name into Google, but it seems he’s credited with asserting the idea that the state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force. I put those two ideas together (my consent and use of physical force) and figure we all give our government the right to use force. So, the way I figure, it’s not okay for our government to use force in any situation where I personally wouldn’t use force.

For example, if I’m not willing to kill a cute cow, I shouldn’t eat steak.

Yep, he's just a nut. Equating the use of physical force with the killing of an animal as a source of food? Seriously???

15 posted on 05/20/2009 2:27:27 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier presently instructing at Ft. Benning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

Good for Penn Jillette. I think I’m about a 98 percent libertarian.


16 posted on 05/20/2009 2:28:42 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
This guy speaks in language so plain

This guy speaks in language so vulgar, he is impossible to listen to, even though he has good points. He is also violently Anti-Christian, calling the Bible bullshit.

22 posted on 05/20/2009 2:36:15 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
For example, if I’m not willing to kill a cute cow, I shouldn’t eat steak. I don’t have to kill Bessy right now with my bare hands, but I have to be willing to snuff her if I want to chow down on a T-bone. If it’s not okay for me, it’s not okay for a slaughterhouse. Asking someone else to do something immoral is immoral.

It's a little convoluted.

A more proper argument is that if you find it immoral to kill a cow to eat or for leather or for birth control, etc, then it doesn't matter if you do not EAT beef, that cows are harvested in this world is immoral.

Now then, if you oppose abortion on the grounds that it violates the rights of the unborn growing children, then taking a stance "not to have an abortion" still does nothing to end the immorality of 50 million dead people.

The mother's body ends at the umbilical cord, where one or more babies are growing. We recognize that a woman who smokes, dopes, or drinks or even takes necessary medications, may be doing her child physical harm if she does these things during her pregnancy. Can the mother be convicted of child abuse for doing these things if it isn't really a baby? If she abused her own body PRIOR to becoming pregnant, she would be unlikely to be charged with child abuse for any problems her child has during a later pregnancy.

The father is obligated to the child for 18 years if the mother becomes pregnant but the woman is permitted to opt out of her own obligations to that same child on demand.

33 posted on 05/20/2009 2:50:38 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (If you like the Dept. of Motor Vehicles, the IRS, and the Post Office, you'll love govt Health Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

Social conservatism does not have to mean executing abortionists or locking up people suspected of homosexual behavior. Certainly it would be a big achievement if the govt simply stopped *promoting* such behavior ($ for planned parenthood, special gay rights such as marriage) but there is a lot the govt can do without being coercive or expansionist. If the govt can put out an ad campaign to encourage people to join the Army or discourage drugs, it should also encourage better, perhaps private education or discourage abortion. It all falls under the ‘power’ of the bully pulpit; the govt should be able to use the modern media.


47 posted on 05/20/2009 3:19:12 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

....Bravo, Penn Jillette, Last time I posted about Mr. Jillette speaking his mind was on Larry King, and all I got back was sh!t about, Why are you watching him? Or fook him, if he’s there. (King). Same drivel from this forum for 8 years bashing third partys, and now the tin hats from the third party are celebrated, and they need to be included in the Gee Ohhh foookin Pee! Cause uuuhhh someobody fooked up the last election, ?!? ,.!,,


64 posted on 05/20/2009 4:24:34 PM PDT by gargoyle (...66.7% , A good round number...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
It’s amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people yourself is compassion. Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.

Quote of the day!

84 posted on 05/21/2009 4:33:54 AM PDT by Cymbaline (Bipartisan consensus - that's like when my doctor and my lawyer agree with my wife that I need help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
“This guy speaks in language so plain”

His language faithfully reflects the depth of his thought. The devil in these matters is in the details. If a president elected with 51% of the votes promulgates his favorite policy, that policy may be against the wishes of 49% of the population. ANY policy is against wishes of at least one member of the population.
If shallow libertarians such as Penn had their wish, there would be no nation -— just a bunch of “individuals” roaming the forests in perpetual arguments and disagreements.

88 posted on 05/21/2009 10:08:32 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys

I like Penn’s rants.


90 posted on 05/21/2009 10:59:50 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeKeys
The fact that the majority wants something good does not give them the right to use force on the minority that don’t want to pay for it. If you have to use a gun, it’s not really a very good idea. Democracy without respect for individual rights sucks. It’s just ganging up on the weird kid, and I’m always the weird kid.

I've said the same thing here over the years and been called a "Utopian nutcase" for it. At least I'm not alone.

"If 'more government' is your answer, are you sure you should be asking the question?" -DC

92 posted on 05/21/2009 11:47:55 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson