Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmel

Good point.


4 posted on 05/27/2009 4:48:34 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GOP Poet

I wonder if they would still consider it the woman’s “choice”, or if they would then consider it “discrimination”? But how can there be discrimination against a “fetus” (as opposed to a human baby)? But then wouldn’t the women be discriminating against an “oppressed minority” by choosing to “get rid of” the “fetus” with the gay gene? Hmmm.


7 posted on 05/27/2009 5:36:10 PM PDT by mrsmel (Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson