Posted on 05/29/2009 1:03:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
All of them.
Yeah, but they weren't victims of.........whatever the latest left wing fad is.
(thank you for voting the socialists out of office. amen)
Yeah, Latino/Latina denotes people who are from Brazil, those who speak Portuguese. Hispanic denotes people from Spanish speaking countries. I learned this on an episode of MONK (the detective on TV:)
Somebody here said she looks like Manuel Noriega, and by golly, she does.
I think the dike is beginning to crack (no pun intended)
Biden to Sonia: “Just blame it on a teleprompter malfunction”
And he allowed the left to force him out. Republicans always give in. The left never does, no matter how plainly we understand what they said. Our weasel representatives in Congress won’t put her on the hotseat for this, when the left would be making hay. It’s maddening that our Congressmen won’t do their jobs, but will let the left manipulate them at will.
It was not a poor choice of words, it was a comment that revealed her soul.
That comment revealed the real Sotomayor. Her lame non-apology reveals nothing more than a willingness to add "liar" to the label of "racist".
And the statement about making policy from the bench?
I don’t think so. I think she meant every word.
Obama is choosing too many anti-Americans! Just too many!
Will she start picking the right words then, like cracker, whitey or Oreo to help justify her decisions?
Let's modify her now infamous quote:
I would hope that a wise Irishman with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Hispanic female who hasnt lived that life.
If ANYONE on the Right had said this, there would have been a public lynching overseen by LULAC and the ACLU!
No excuse Judge Sotomayor! You are a Racist and a distraction to the more important issues facing this country. For the good of the Administration and the country, you need to withdraw your name.
The initial meeting is supposedly with Harry, Leaky Leahy and Jeff Sessions and a possible Mitch Mcconnell meet as well. Those are the only names out there for now. Looks like Cornyn or Specter needn’t bother.
Robert “I’m not telling you what he said, I’m telling you what he meant to say” Gibbs.
Judging by the sheer number of decisions by Cardozo you read in law school, she may not be far off if she had said Hispanic. (Yes, somewhat sarcastic, but it did seem like he wrote every other opinion there for a while. Certainly every case from New York.)
How many honkies does it take to elect Obama and how many will wake up and realize that Obama and Sotomayor are a repudiation of MLK?
That's what I was thinking. Hearsay is not evidence; it is not convincing.
Sotomayor is guilty. As is Gibbs.
I think they call this a Freudian slip.
I also think that it’s very telling that WH is trying to pre-empt this matter. Sounds like Rahm or some such did a focus group. Americans just aren’t going to take well to that sentiment as expressed by the lovely and impartial Ms. Sotomayor.
The pubs should all be hobnobbing this weekend and coming up with a plan. The WH is coming out with this tidbit NOT because they are just trying to clarify things.
It can derail things and with a loyal opposition party that killing little phrase could possibly see the light of day.
But it would risk disrupture of carefully placed head hairs, loss of an invite to a DC cocktail party, perhaps angering a friend across the aisle.
It requires gonads also.
We shall see. The WH is practically paving the way.
We are directly over target...send in the next waves. Continue pounding the target.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.