Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is this US Representative Jordan on CNBC, talking about the GM bankruptcy?
CNBC | 06/01/2009 | Self-vanity

Posted on 06/01/2009 5:51:31 PM PDT by mtrott

This guy is placing the blame squarely where it belongs--on the federal government's ever escalating CAFE standards and lack of an energy policy that could have kept our gas from going to $4/gallon, which scared people off the light trucks that GM and Chrysler can make a profit on. He is saying exactly what I have been railing about since last fall!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/01/2009 5:51:31 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mtrott

http://jordan.house.gov/index.shtml


2 posted on 06/01/2009 6:04:36 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

Jim Jordan was raised in Champaign County, Ohio, graduating from Graham High School in 1982, where he was a four-time state champion in wrestling with a career record of 150-1. He went on to earn a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from the University of Wisconsin, where he was a two-time NCAA wrestling champion. He later earned a Master’s degree in Education from the Ohio State University and a Law Degree from Capital University in Columbus, Ohio.

Jordan is a fiscal conservative who believes that families and taxpayers, rather than government, know best how to make decisions with their money. Throughout his career, Jim Jordan has led the fight against tax hikes, including those proposed by his own political party. Jim Jordan believes that cutting taxes and letting families keep more of what they earn helps build strong communities and a vibrant economy.

Jim Jordan was named Pro-Life legislator of the Year from United Conservatives of Ohio and won the Defender of Life award from Ohio Right to Life for his unwavering commitment to protecting the sanctity of human life. In Congress, Jordan has championed legislation in defense of the unborn and has led the fight on pro-family issues like defending traditional marriage and giving parents the tools they need to help build a brighter future for their children.

Congressman Jordan has long been a vocal supporter of securing our borders and enforcing our nation’s laws to deal with the problems stemming from illegal immigration. He is active in supporting the rule of law and fixing the system so that families who long to come to America can do so the right way by learning English, gaining legal citizenship and becoming taxpaying Americans.

In Congress, Jordan has also emerged as a prominent defender of the taxpayer’s pocketbook through his work on spending issues. He continues to support making the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent and has offered a series of budget and appropriations amendments aimed at stemming the excessive growth of government spending. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee, the House Budget Committee, and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Jim and his wife Polly are the parents of four children. The Jordan family lives near Urbana and attends Grace Bible Church.

3 posted on 06/01/2009 6:27:02 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

he was awesome


4 posted on 06/01/2009 6:28:31 PM PDT by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

From his website:
Jim Jordan was raised in Champaign County, Ohio, graduating from Graham High School in 1982, where he was a four-time state champion in wrestling with a career record of 150-1. He went on to earn a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from the University of Wisconsin, where he was a two-time NCAA wrestling champion. He later earned a Master’s degree in Education from the Ohio State University and a Law Degree from Capital University in Columbus, Ohio.

Jordan is a fiscal conservative who believes that families and taxpayers, rather than government, know best how to make decisions with their money. Throughout his career, Jim Jordan has led the fight against tax hikes, including those proposed by his own political party. Jim Jordan believes that cutting taxes and letting families keep more of what they earn helps build strong communities and a vibrant economy.

Jim Jordan was named Pro-Life legislator of the Year from United Conservatives of Ohio and won the Defender of Life award from Ohio Right to Life for his unwavering commitment to protecting the sanctity of human life. In Congress, Jordan has championed legislation in defense of the unborn and has led the fight on pro-family issues like defending traditional marriage and giving parents the tools they need to help build a brighter future for their children.

Congressman Jordan has long been a vocal supporter of securing our borders and enforcing our nation’s laws to deal with the problems stemming from illegal immigration. He is active in supporting the rule of law and fixing the system so that families who long to come to America can do so the right way by learning English, gaining legal citizenship and becoming taxpaying Americans.

In Congress, Jordan has also emerged as a prominent defender of the taxpayer’s pocketbook through his work on spending issues. He continues to support making the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent and has offered a series of budget and appropriations amendments aimed at stemming the excessive growth of government spending. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee, the House Budget Committee, and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Jim and his wife Polly are the parents of four children. The Jordan family lives near Urbana and attends Grace Bible Church.


5 posted on 06/01/2009 7:01:12 PM PDT by greyline90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott
That's Jim Jordan, and he's my Congressman. I'm proud to say I campaigned for him when he ran for State offices, and again when he ran for Congress. He's a great guy. He was a speaker at our Tea Party on April 15.
6 posted on 06/01/2009 7:02:36 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bubman

Now they’ll keep Gitmo open for sure - to house Baraq’s critics like that.


7 posted on 06/01/2009 7:03:18 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

Wow....CNBC accidently let some sanity shine outta the TV set???? Someone’s in trouble.


8 posted on 06/01/2009 7:25:51 PM PDT by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

He is right

The new Obama CAFE standard will keep them from recovering,

We need cheap energy and there is plenty of it.

What do they do?? Stop drilling, threaten to raise gas prices to $5.00 a gallon, and piss away money on green technology that won’t work in the near 20 year future.

The only way GM can survive is if the Congress passes laws that make the rest of the auto companies build the same crap Government makes GM build.


9 posted on 06/01/2009 7:25:53 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Jordan is a conservative’s conservative. He is not afraid to address the tough issues and is able to verbalize sound arguments.


10 posted on 06/01/2009 7:26:36 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
"That's Jim Jordan, and he's my Congressman. I'm proud to say I campaigned for him when he ran for State offices, and again when he ran for Congress. He's a great guy. He was a speaker at our Tea Party on April 15."

Tell him to go down to the nearest federal courthouse ASAP and DEMAND to see PROOF that the Twentieth amendment, section 3 was complied with. He "HAS STANDING" to do so. Here is his case:

Exhibit A, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:

" ”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19

TITLE 3--THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES

Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act

”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “

Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:

” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Exhibit D: The Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877:

The process currently provides that someone “challenge” the electoral votes during a short, specified time frame while the Electoral College votes are opened and tabulated. This process does not cover challenges to "eligibility" qualifications. In fact, if this act pretends to do so in the manner in which it prescribes, it is unconstitutional. Any act of this sort that does not require that qualifications be presented by the President elect serves to undercut the provisions in the Constitution itself. No act that does not support the Constitution is constitutional. In order to change the requirements of the Twentieth amendment, one would need to pass another amendment. An “Act” doesn’t cut the mustard.

The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.

There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?

If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.

Based upon the above, I conclude that:

1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms "The President elect shall have failed to qualify" clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.

2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has "standing" and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to "support" the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.

3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.

11 posted on 06/01/2009 7:43:24 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

Sounds as if we have a true statesman looking after us.


12 posted on 06/01/2009 8:43:31 PM PDT by lakey (To ALL Congressperps - YOU'RE FIRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

WOW, I’m a Jordan and I hope that I am related to this guy somowhere somhow.


13 posted on 06/01/2009 10:28:47 PM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Well, if the GOP had more guys like this appearing on TV and in charge of the party, rather than RINOs like Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, I just might think about sending them some money.

BTW, I have a pretty good congressman as well, in Louie Ghomert.


14 posted on 06/02/2009 5:32:48 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson