Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate bill fines people refusing health coverage (public ‘option’ will be forced? RomneyCare!)
AP via Google ^ | 7/02/09 | RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

Posted on 07/02/2009 3:18:48 PM PDT by Libloather

Senate bill fines people refusing health coverage
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR – 58 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Barack Obama's top domestic priority.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years. Senate aides said the penalties would be modeled on the approach taken by Massachusetts, which now imposes a fine of about $1,000 a year on individuals who refuse to get coverage. Under the federal legislation, families would pay higher penalties than individuals.

In a revamped health care system envisioned by lawmakers, people would be required to carry health insurance just like motorists must get auto coverage now. The government would provide subsidies for the poor and many middle-class families, but those who still refuse to sign up would face penalties.

Called "shared responsibility payments," the fines would be set at least half the cost of basic medical coverage, according to the legislation.

In 2008, employer-provided coverage averaged $12,680 a year for a family plan, and $4,704 for individual coverage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation's annual survey. Senate aides, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, said the cost of the federal plan would be lower but declined to provide specifics.

The legislation would exempt certain hardship cases from fines.

The new proposals were released as Congress neared the end of a weeklong July 4 break, with lawmakers expected to quickly take up health care legislation when they return to Washington. With deepening divisions along partisan and ideological lines, the complex legislation faces an uncertain future.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhohealthcare; bill; commie; coverage; health; hillarycareredux; romney; romneycare; romneytruthfile; senate; socialism; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: Libloather
Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Barack Obama's top domestic priority.

[Cue Borg voice] We are the Liberals, resistance is futile. Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us. [/Borg voice]

These morons must truly believe they are omnipotent. I don't think we can afford to wait for the 2010 elections (assuming they'll be free and fair).

61 posted on 07/02/2009 5:59:09 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What will they do if your religion is Scientology? The liberals always scream about the separation of church and state. I bet they will be silent on this issue.

What if you are a gun owner? Is the government going to tax guns in a stealth way by saying your are now a higher health risk and forcing you to pay higher premiums? Bring in your guns and we will lower your health insurance?

This is all about control and reparations.

So much for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


62 posted on 07/02/2009 6:05:19 PM PDT by ThE_RiPpEr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Enough about Romney! This isn’t only about him! It’s about all Liberals. If Romney died, would this bill become acceptable?


63 posted on 07/02/2009 6:05:32 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
RomneyCare redux. Is there any doubt that Romney would be pushing exactly this kind of plan were he in office?

And the frightening thing is--he could have pushed it through. With Obama in charge, the GOP at least has a political reason to fight and probably defeat it.

In this case, we're so much better off having Obama as president than a socialist fraud like Romney.
64 posted on 07/02/2009 6:13:16 PM PDT by Antoninus (Queer is boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Government is always a terrible master.


65 posted on 07/02/2009 6:19:33 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

So if Romney runs in 2012 our choices will be what exactly? Bankruptcy or unaffordable health care? Oh yay!


66 posted on 07/02/2009 6:20:48 PM PDT by ActrFshr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

BTTT


67 posted on 07/02/2009 6:24:34 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (Lord protect us from our overseers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wonder how they will determine who is “poor” to recieve subsidies for health care.

If someone has a 3,500 s.f. home, 3 suvs, commercial property with a tenant, and owns his own business..will they still be considered poor like a certain SCHIP family?


68 posted on 07/02/2009 6:25:43 PM PDT by icwhatudo (For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Oops, left out the two rooftop decks...


69 posted on 07/02/2009 6:26:04 PM PDT by icwhatudo (For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

So they are going to fine Collage kids who have Emergency Medical?

Excellent!


70 posted on 07/02/2009 6:49:27 PM PDT by Patas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Will anyone get to actually read the plan?

Sure, once it's translated from the original Russian.

71 posted on 07/02/2009 6:56:34 PM PDT by Texas Mulerider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000... The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years. Senate aides said the penalties would be modeled on the approach taken by Massachusetts, which now imposes a fine of about $1,000 a year on individuals who refuse to get coverage. Under the federal legislation, families would pay higher penalties than individuals.
That means, all those without coverage right now (those Obama et al are trying to "protect") will be forced to opt in (which means it ain't really an "opt") to make sure the insufficient tax revenue supporting the system won't be so insufficient that, for example, people like Raum Emanuel will have to start paying taxes.
72 posted on 07/02/2009 7:13:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Probably the same one that forced us to buy car dealerships.


73 posted on 07/02/2009 7:22:12 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
In a revamped health care system envisioned by lawmakers, people would be required to carry health insurance just like motorists must get auto coverage now. The government would provide subsidies for the poor and many middle-class families, but those who still refuse to sign up would face penalties.

Ping for later

74 posted on 07/02/2009 7:26:01 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Luther's phrase "faith alone" is true, if it is not opposed to faith in charity, in love" - BXVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
General Petreaus:

Lead by example as demonstrated elsewhere, sir

Our Constitution is in danger...you swore to uphold and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Domestic enemies ARE at the door, sir....

75 posted on 07/02/2009 7:26:49 PM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Do you need another sharp shooter at your place?


76 posted on 07/02/2009 7:32:45 PM PDT by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

My 28 year old son did not yet sign up for medical insurance in Massachusetts and when he filed his State Income Tax he was hit for a 570.00 penalty thanks to ‘Romneycare’.


77 posted on 07/02/2009 7:32:57 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

**[Cue Borg voice] We are the Liberals, resistance is futile. Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us. [/Borg voice]**

All my medical expenses for the last 10 years (including one broken Leg and spouses LASIK Surgery, and my Glaucoma Surgery) would only cover about 2 years worth of Health Insurance Premiums.

YO, BARKY ... take your “”Affordable B******* Coverage and ...


78 posted on 07/02/2009 7:33:05 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - To Conservatives, a WARNING - to Liberals, a TEXTBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

AMEN to that Jim. Romney care in MA is a nightmare, AND it’s broke! It has caused those of us with medical coverage to wait month’s to get an appointment for a simple check up. We have young people who were unable to leave home because they couldn’t afford medical insurance, car insurance in order to have their own place. Now, they aren’t working, and get unemployment, and one week has to go to their stupid medical insurance. Not to mention, after paying for it every month, they never get to use it because you must reach $2500. before you can.

I refuse to call it healthcare. That is something we do ourselves, medical care is something doctors provide, medical insurance is what we join to help with the expense of possible serious and expensive procedures that may come up.


79 posted on 07/02/2009 7:36:39 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

bookmark romneycare


80 posted on 07/02/2009 7:42:09 PM PDT by DrewsMum (Let men marry men and women marry women... and in 3 generations, there will be no democrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson