Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stock Traders Find Speed Pays, in Milliseconds
The New York Times ^ | 07/23/2009 | Charles Duhigg

Posted on 07/24/2009 8:31:48 AM PDT by NMRed

It is the hot new thing on Wall Street, a way for a handful of traders to master the stock market, peek at investors’ orders and, critics say, even subtly manipulate share prices.

It is called high-frequency trading — and it is suddenly one of the most talked-about and mysterious forces in the markets.

Powerful computers, some housed right next to the machines that drive marketplaces like the New York Stock Exchange, enable high-frequency traders to transmit millions of orders at lightning speed and, their detractors contend, reap billions at everyone else’s expense.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: goldmansachs; obama; stockmarket
Interesting that the Times ignores that Goldman Sachs was the Big O's, and Democrats', biggest private contributor in 2008. Or that GS may have manipulated the sub-prime bubble that caused the recession. Or that they are a driving force behind cap-and-tax. There's a good article at American Thinker that outines it.
1 posted on 07/24/2009 8:31:50 AM PDT by NMRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NMRed
This article could explain a lot. Huge profits at GS, weird movements in the market and unexplained patterns of trading. If true, it amounts to the same advantage as insider trading - knowledge available to a charmed few that is denied to the average trader. I was surprised that you can get advanced information for a fee.
2 posted on 07/24/2009 8:50:11 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I am Richard Brandon

“If true, it amounts to the same advantage as insider trading”
I’m sure that Goldman Sachs only uses their advanced information for the public good. It’s all we would expect from the D’s biggest private contributor. And the rules which allow them to do this were implemented in 1998, when Robert Rubin was Treasury Secretary.


3 posted on 07/24/2009 9:07:18 AM PDT by NMRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I am Richard Brandon
Same ol' same ol'...

Technocratic manipulation of the sheeple via occult (hidden) knowledge  is hardly anything new.
 
 
 
Got Shock and Awe?

4 posted on 07/24/2009 9:11:24 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NMRed
High Frequency Trading Is A Scam.
5 posted on 07/24/2009 9:15:02 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMRed
“If true, it amounts to the same advantage as insider trading”

Bullsh--. This claim is like saying that those who read Barron's or IBD are "insider trading" because they have more knowledge of the markets than the average Joe on the street.

The firms are simply paying a very large amount of money to get the same data feeds everyone else gets, but faster, and then paying a lot of expensive software engineers and quants to devise algorithms to take advantage of the speed. That's all.

6 posted on 07/24/2009 9:39:08 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
"This claim is like saying that those who read Barron's or IBD are 'insider trading' because they have more knowledge of the markets than the average Joe on the street."

The difference, as I see it, is that even I can afford Barron's or IBD, nor do Barron's or IBD manipulate prices in real time as the NYT article accuses the software of doing. It was not my original contention that this is insider trading, but please keep in mind that Goldman has admitted to federal prosecutors that its software is capable of manipulating markets, and that it uses this software for all of its trades.

7 posted on 07/24/2009 10:15:54 AM PDT by NMRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Traders working for a firm have ALWAYS held an advantage over regular Joes. If you trade stocks you can pay a fee and receive level II which shows the stacked bid/sell prices. Some brokers offer level II for free if you trade thru them. Market Makers have always had access to Level III which is deeper, and yes they pay for it.
I have traded for over 10 yrs now, first stocks and then I switched to index futures. I always knew and still do that the pro traders have an advantage over me. Doesn’t mean I can’t make money though.


8 posted on 07/24/2009 10:23:46 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
>>Bullsh--.
 
"Automatic programs began issuing and canceling tiny orders within milliseconds to determine how much the slower traders were willing to pay."
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1259-High-Frequency-Trading-Is-A-Scam.html
 
Bovine Excrement has always accompanied the keepers of The Bull...
 
 
 

9 posted on 07/24/2009 10:24:05 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NMRed
Just about any trading software is capable of manipulating markets if you can enter a large enough quantity at a given price level, you can move the market up or down.

It's not the software oir its speed of execution, but whether you a deliberately moving the prices around without the intent to sell at that price.

The latter would be market manipulation, but putting small orders in where you are still exposed, even if you plan on cancelling them is not.

You guys know too that many MM's get paid in part based on the volume they bring to the exchange, so they get part of the exchange's transaction fees. This means they can deliberately make what looks like a 'losing' quote to pull in volume at a 'loss' that turns into a profit based on the transaction fees paid by the exchange back to the MM.

In brief, don't pick a strategy based on speed, unless you can invest $30 million in equipment & software to keep up with the big boys.

10 posted on 07/24/2009 12:15:00 PM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
Here's the real BS:

While markets are supposed to ensure transparency by showing orders to everyone simultaneously, a loophole in regulations allows marketplaces like Nasdaq to show traders some orders ahead of everyone else in exchange for a fee.

Do you know _anyone_ who gets real-time data (let alone real-time book data) FOR NOTHING??

BTW, it isn't millesecond time intervals now, its microseconds.

11 posted on 07/24/2009 12:19:59 PM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
"don't pick a strategy based on speed, unless you can invest $30 million in equipment & software to keep up with the big boys." On that, we certainly agree!
12 posted on 07/24/2009 12:27:49 PM PDT by NMRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NMRed

Actually, that’s not what “high frequency trading” is, and Wall Street has been “peeking at customer orders” from the beginning. Going electronic just meant that, once they staffed up with Indian and Asian programmers, it was easier to do and harder to hide.


13 posted on 07/24/2009 2:35:48 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson