Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Nat Hentoff] The Founding Fathers would have hated hate-crimes laws
Jewish World Review ^ | July 29, 2009 | Nat Hentoff

Posted on 07/29/2009 9:36:28 AM PDT by rhema

Throughout the Bush-Cheney creation of a society under surveillance and unprecedented government secrecy, I have often praised Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., for resisting that administration's penchant for degrading the Constitution. But on July 16, he proudly watched as the Senate passed his "hate crimes" bill (the Matthew Shepard Act) that is the biggest expansion of federal hate-crimes laws since 1968 — providing extra prison time to committers of violent acts perceived to be based on sexual orientation, gender identity or disability (adding to the previous classifications of race, color, religion or national origin).

On the Senate floor, John McCain, R-Ariz., cut to the unconstitutional core of this bill and all such "hate crime" legislation. Leahy's bill, as of this writing, the president is eager to sign.

Said McCain: "Our legal system is based on identifying, capturing and punishing criminals, and not on using the power of government to try to divine biases." In opposing what James Madison condemned as "thought crimes," McCain added: "Crimes motivated by hate deserve vigorous prosecution, but so do crimes motivated by absolute wanton disregard for life of any kind." No matter against whom.

Leahy's bill, like the counterpart "hate crimes" measure of House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., that passed in the House this past April, violates the 14th Amendment's equal protection under the laws for individual Americans by setting up a special collective class of victims whose assailants, when convicted, will be given extra punishment for crimes perceived to be based on gender identity, sexual orientation or disability, among other biases.

Those who attack the elderly, police or those of the poor who are not among the "protected classes" would not get lengthier "hate" sentences than the law provides for the ACT itself. Doesn't this make lesser citizens of their victims?

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hatecrime; obama

1 posted on 07/29/2009 9:36:29 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema

Because they were racist salve-owners with wooden teeth, right?


2 posted on 07/29/2009 9:37:17 AM PDT by Rodebrecht (If everybody just left everybody else alone, everybody would be a lot happier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht

salve=slave


3 posted on 07/29/2009 9:37:39 AM PDT by Rodebrecht (If everybody just left everybody else alone, everybody would be a lot happier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The Founding Fathers would be horrified at most of the developments which have occurred in this nation since the New Deal. This was not what they intended.


4 posted on 07/29/2009 9:38:26 AM PDT by Welcome2thejungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Love him or hate him, Nate Hentoff is an honest liberal. A real rare bird.
5 posted on 07/29/2009 9:40:05 AM PDT by Tupelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Like a lot of Freepers, I am still trying to get my head around what a like crime is. Murder is murder, rape is rape, and assault is assault. Do perps stay thank you in a non hate crime?


6 posted on 07/29/2009 9:44:19 AM PDT by nyconse (When you buy something, make an investment in your country. Buy American or bye bye America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

ALL of the laws are pretty much on the books, for just about any circumstance imaginable. Congress only keeps in business by making the already-existing laws more insanely specific or by naming them after people.


7 posted on 07/29/2009 9:46:48 AM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The Founding Fathers would have hated hate-crimes laws

Sometimes I guess you have to state the obvious.

Anyway, a remark like this just makes the leftists more smug.

8 posted on 07/29/2009 9:55:49 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Congress only keeps in business by making the already-existing laws more insanely specific or by naming them after people.

Your general point is correct but actually they're buying votes by pandering to self-selected politically correct "victim" groups. The intended effect is to increase hatred toward white, straight Caucasian males so as to marginalize them.

9 posted on 07/29/2009 9:56:51 AM PDT by Bernard Marx ("Civilizations die by suicide, not from murder" Toynbee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson