Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
吃驚さん、my point is that A4 size paper seems anachronistic: I don't believe that a 1964 Australian government document, as the Bomford original purports to be, would have been printed on A4 paper. I don't think Australia adopted the use of A4 paper until the 1970s.
I lived in Hawaii for 4 years. When my father was transfered we moved to N.J. I was in the 6th grade. I had a deep dark tan. The first day of school I came home and told my Mom that the kids at school thought I was black. This despite the fact that I had very sun bleached blond hair and very blue eyes.
Obama didn’t contest the divorce, I think some letter was sent to him about it and he never picked up the letter. But the lawyer didn’t know what Obama was going to do, so to be safe, he figured he might as well get the kids BC.
It’s starting to look like theres a Kenyan BC, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a Hawaiian BC, which Obamas grandma would have enabled by forging Obamas mom’s name on a form.
Assuming that, why did Obamas moms lawyer ask for the kenyan bc instead of the hawaiian bc? Maybe Obamas mom didn’t know about the hawaiian bc at that point, maybe the grandma just went and sent in the form on her own?
I agree...the things one learns on FR! Incredible...
|
|
Awesome bit of work! How do you decipher what date a given image was uploaded to the server though? Is Miriam Mata an employee at the hosting company? |
|
I think this needs a ping, LucyT!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=6372#6372
“It was found—according to the person who sent the e-mail to Texas Darli’—on microfiche”
Thanks for the information, I had thought it might be microfilm because that is what I normally find in the libraries I have frequented.... but do find microfiche on occasion.
My point was that, with the specialized equipment required, it doesn’t seem very feasible that someone would alter copies and place them in libraries. It would be difficult to determine which libraries to place the altered copies in and even more difficult to place enough copies to make it unlikely that someone would choose a library with an unaltered copy.
It is more likely that someone would produce a fake copy and then do a “song and dance” about it. This is probably what was done... unless it IS authentic. Therefore someone choosing a library, at random, would be likely to find an authentic copy, thus exposing the hoax.
Heck I wasn’t even sure how microfiche copies were made, did know it was a 4” X 5” film format. Couldn’t find much information on the Internet (quick search) but did figure out the most likely method.
Seem likely that the records would be copied on 16 mm film and then a 4” X 5” “contact sheet” of these negatives would be used for the microfiche. The math also, assuming lost space for borders. works.
BTW, conservativegramma brought that to the table.. Man, need sleep, but can’t stop.. sorry grammy
A) The reason for a birth certificate being necessary is because she would have to show proof she was his MOTHER and that Obama was recognized as his FATHER. I had to submit birth certificates for my children in my divorce or I could get a divorce decree made out to whatever. Not to mention he was named after his father, if his father chose to take him back to Kenya, who would stop him without a custody order (given in the divorce). It’s silly to think there is no reason to need a birth certificate in a divorce before there was a thing called “no fault divorce”. How was she to know he wouldn’t answer the summons for the divorce? And who would be stupid enough to take that chance?
B) Airplanes to Africa were for the very very wealthy. Ship passage seemed to be a more common way to go back then. If she got stranded out there in labor, wouldn’t it make sense she would be near a PORT? Mombasa is THE port for Kenya.
C)Mombasa was not a ‘part’ of Zanzibar. Zanzibar held the deed on the land, but it had been leased FOR the state of Kenya for 75 years. If you rent an apartment, are you not able to use that as your address? Of course you are, same as Kenya used Mombasa as THEIR domain because it was PAID to be their domain.
So it’s not quite so cut and dry, is it?
Nice post.
You have a lot of reading to do.
Better start now before there is more to read.
I think that anyone who works with graphics would notice that the Kenyan document, as presented, shows serious signs of being fiddled with...
The pixels around the lettering are a bit of a tip-off.
Then again the obots will insist that the Hawaii document presented online is genuine even though it has the same pixel effect around it’s lettering.
The Australian one has some of the same effect, though it is much more hidden. As presented, I think both images (Kenyan vs Australian) are tampered.
The reasons for the fraudulent Australian document are obvious.
Perhaps the Kenyan Document I am witnessing is a result of o-bot tampering... Or ... Maybe Taitz and co are smarter than the obots could ever imagine. They may know exactly what they are doing.
I hope so.
See 6429
All of the nonsense that you bring up has been well answered.
Go read, and don’t bug us anymoree!
Oooppps, posted wrong years, sorry, I’m tired.
4. December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986
If at the time of your birth both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship with no conditions for retaining it.
If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. There are no conditions placed on retaining this type of citizenship. If your one U.S. citizen parent is your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules apply if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time. If legitimization occurred after November 14, 1986, your father must have established paternity prior to your 18th birthday, either by acknowledgment or by court order, and must have stated in writing that he would support you financially until your 18th birthday.
From Hawaii to New Jersey? Did that suck?
How come it’s sealed and notarized in 1964???
Think? My brain shut down yesterday...I just cannot get past the fact that the same problems apply to the little 'l' for a 'one' on both the divorce document and the 'kenyan' BC.
Something is telling me they were both typed at the same time.
when it comes to idetifying fonts, I might as well be blind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.