Romney in ‘12?
Just say “HELL NO! NEVER!”
“Romneycare” in Massachusetts IS socialised medicine, and a lot of other things that too-slick-by-half knucklehead has done are so close to socialism/liberalism it is not possible to determine any difference.
Romney would represent another 4 years of socialism - only the march music would be slower.
If I were betting right now I’d say you are just another one of many of the reeking romneybots that come out from under a rock every time Sarah Palin’s name is mentioned.
That slimy, oily substance that follows in his wake is the slug trail of his real political character. It has long since been expose that the undermining of Sarah Palin leaking information from within the GOP to enemies was coming from Romney devotees.
If Bobby Jindal is even half as smart as his governing policies and decisions so far indicate, he would not come within a country mile of the Romney-stench.
Try Palin/Jindal for 2012 and you will have a smart, true conservative combo that rings true with voters.
The only way Mitt will ever see the inside of the WH on a recurrent basis would be as a (maybe)low-level Palin/Jindal Cabinet appointee - or by taking one of those nifty tours open to the general public.
Screw Mitt - ‘cause that’s what his minions tried to do to Palin and we all know it.
A.A.C.
Waitaminnit - I’ll tell you how I really feel.
Please do LOL