Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heads Up - Multiple COLBS Warning [someone swapped out the Kenya BC AFTER it was posted]
Various ^ | August 3, 2009 | Various

Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,001-2,0202,021-2,0402,041-2,060 ... 2,301-2,312 next last
To: iSarah

Sarah, the jpgs are screen shots of PDFs. The jpgs weren’t the created graphic.


2,021 posted on 08/04/2009 5:59:10 PM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2000 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’ve never started one and wouldn’t know in what section to post it in......If you could start it that would be great. Then the many Freepers who have posted all over this thread and the long thread could share their ‘findings’.


2,022 posted on 08/04/2009 6:04:07 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2020 | View Replies]

To: All

this is the site of the official insignia and emblems of south australia.
http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/

the state badge was chosen in 1904, and is a piping shrike with wings spread, surrounded by the words south australia, found here http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/shrike1.htm.

the office of consumer and business affairs has an emblem found here http://www.ocba.sa.gov.au/bdm/index.html, used for the office of births, deaths, and marriages.

none of these look like the seal used on the south australian birth certificate


2,023 posted on 08/04/2009 6:05:17 PM PDT by backpacker_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2014 | View Replies]

To: backpacker_c
That's incorrect. The South Australia Coat of Arms was changed to the Shrike in 1984. Previous to that, the coat was
As explained here: http://www.ngw.nl/int/aus/southaus.htm
2,024 posted on 08/04/2009 6:07:50 PM PDT by Adammon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2023 | View Replies]

To: All

the state coat of arms for south australia is also found here http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/coatarm1.htm


2,025 posted on 08/04/2009 6:08:22 PM PDT by backpacker_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2023 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

I posted this on the epic thread but will toss it in here as well.

I found a font online called P22 Typewriter. It appears to have a 1 that matches the ‘out of place’ 1 on the Aussie BC and a lower case l that matches too.

http://www.fonts.com/FindFonts/Detail.htm?pid=4345298&/cgi-bin/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=0&page_id=53804&query=TYPEWRITER&SCOPE=Fonts

If you visit that link and go to the ‘About this font’ tab, it will give a quick description. The last sentence says, “Additional characters were sourced from other vintage typewriters and others were designed to complete the full character set”.

Not sure which characters though...


2,026 posted on 08/04/2009 6:09:45 PM PDT by wndawmn666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2019 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Yes, saw that. Thanks.


2,027 posted on 08/04/2009 6:15:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1911 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Thanks Harvey.


2,028 posted on 08/04/2009 6:20:24 PM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...
.

Pinging to #1,986 - interesting.

.

2,029 posted on 08/04/2009 6:27:03 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1986 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
The basis for doubting the authenticity of the Australian document is not whether PE removes sections, but the actual side by side of the elements. Please give me your professional opinion. Thanks

I'm not sure what you mean by "side by side of the elements". The Photoshop Elements routine that was used just tries to break the image apart along what look (to a Photoshop software programmer) as lines in the jpeg. I don't think there is anything meaningful to be learned by that. But I could be wrong.

As to Post 1482 I have looked at that part of the Australian BC in Photoshop. There is no doubt that the printed "Deputy" looks like it is a layer above the a signature layer that was not blended properly nor merged properly. This would be pretty good evidence of a fake if it weren't for the fact that the signature is clearly on top of the printed word "registrar". That's very strange. The "Deputy" looks as fake as it can be. And "registrar" looks good as gold. Go figure. I don't know what to make of it.

2,030 posted on 08/04/2009 6:28:35 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1994 | View Replies]

To: bustinchops

What poem?


2,031 posted on 08/04/2009 6:40:23 PM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1955 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Gotta wonder what would happen if we did the reverse of fake DU BC forms. Without getting too specific, what if a long form that the DUmmies can only dream of was to suddenly appear like it was hiding in plain site for years and years.


2,032 posted on 08/04/2009 6:41:47 PM PDT by lovesdogs (I will not lay down and die. This is my country and with God's help I will take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2016 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

The Y crossing over the D is explained away as the inverted dark black being stronger than the inverted lighter Y. It’s similar to a grey pen being written on white paper and crossing a black line. When inverted, the grey will appear below the now white line because the black can’t get any blacker. Same principle applies.


2,033 posted on 08/04/2009 6:42:51 PM PDT by Adammon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2030 | View Replies]

To: wndawmn666

Looks like it’s close to the different looking “1” on the Bomford B.C. However the ‘flag’ on top of the “1” doesn’t look long enough or curved enough in that example of the P22 Type.....I’ll take another look.


2,034 posted on 08/04/2009 6:53:59 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2026 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Take the Deputy Registrar part of the Bomford B.C. and enlarge it up to 600 percent. You can clearly see the entire block outline of that particular layer in contrast to the surrounding pixels.


2,035 posted on 08/04/2009 7:04:04 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2030 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

It’s a slam dunk IMO.


2,036 posted on 08/04/2009 7:07:24 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2035 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
"Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. were divorced in 1964 (divorce filed in January, BC issued in February, divorce granted in March), leaving some to speculate that Ann requested an offical copy of Barry Jr.’s BC in order to prove parentage and obtain custody. Makes sense, but who knows?

The divorce was uncontested, so there likely wasn't any documentation needed.

2,037 posted on 08/04/2009 7:22:27 PM PDT by Devils Avocado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2005 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti
This doesn't show the blocking that well but you can clearly see it if you play around with it in photoshop. They tried to help out the "S". They just forgot the "D"(Which is not shown here). They were on a limited timetable;)


2,038 posted on 08/04/2009 7:27:10 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2035 | View Replies]

To: Devils Avocado

The divorce notice or whatever it’s called was sent to Obama Sr’s address in Cambridge, MA, but he didn’t respond. But how were Stanley and her lawyer to know beforehand that Obama Sr wouldnt’ respond, what to speak of contest anything? They still would have had to cross the t’s and dot the i’s just in case.


2,039 posted on 08/04/2009 7:31:53 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2037 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

Did anyone see how Orly has said on her website that she believes the Bomford is a fake.


2,040 posted on 08/04/2009 7:32:56 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2038 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,001-2,0202,021-2,0402,041-2,060 ... 2,301-2,312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson