Can the person who first posted this thread give an estimate of what time *they* found it?
Just because we saw it “early” doesn’t mean somebody else didn’t find it much *earlier*.
True, but it depends on Sunday's thread, not this one. The image labeled "original" at the top of this thread has no trail of custody.
I made the PNG capture at 2:02AM PDT, on Sunday, August 2, 2009, and posted the JPEG version to Reply #52 at 2:10:36AM, also on Sunday, August 2, 2009. That is the earliest anyone could have copied the so-called "K" birth certificate image. No one has shown such an image that is not a copy of the one I created to provide a quick look at the BC in question that did not take a long time for dial-up Freepers to download.
I made the PNG capture at 2:02AM PDT, on Sunday, August 2, 2009, and posted the JPEG version to Reply #52 at 2:10:36AM, also on Sunday, August 2, 2009. That is the earliest anyone could have copied the so-called "K" birth certificate image. No one has shown such an image that is not a copy of the one I created to provide a quick look at the BC in question that did not take a long time for dial-up Freepers to download.
The one that heads up this thread, although it's stored on a different file server, has the exact same file size, 87,414 Bytes, as mine. It overlays exactly on my image. Ergo, it is a copy of the one I posted at 2:10:36AM. I could go looking for others, but they either come from my hosting site or the one Calpernia used. All of the so-called "slight changes" Calpernia is concerned about are the result of artifacting created when I reduced the file size from 860K to 87K using the JPEG data compression process.