Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI director outraged by Lockerbie bomber release (Obama on release: "highly objectionable"
AP ^ | 22 SEP 2009 | AP

Posted on 08/22/2009 12:35:19 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet

"Your action," he wrote MacAskill, "makes a mockery of the grief of the families who lost their own on December 21, 1988. You could not have spent much time with the families, certainly not as much time as others involved in the investigation and prosecution."

He ended the Lockerbie letter with a frustrated question: "Where, I ask, is the justice?"

President Barack Obama on Friday called the elaborate homecoming in Libya for the freed bomber "highly objectionable."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: almegrahi; fbi; highlyobjectionable; lockerbie; macaskill; murder; objectionable; scotland; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
Obama feels highly objectionable. The Libyan head of state embraces a murderer of americans and the president of the united states states the release is "highly objectionable". Our country has lost its way.
1 posted on 08/22/2009 12:35:19 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

We should have had a stealth bomber flying over the spot of his homecoming and dropped a 2,000 lbs bomb on the whole crowd.


2 posted on 08/22/2009 12:39:52 PM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Wave up America. Pres_ _ent Obama did not say the
release was objectionable. It was the reception.
Should it have been in the Oval Office?


3 posted on 08/22/2009 12:40:11 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
You are so right. We should be cutting off diplomatic ties with Libya, and telling the government of Scotland that all goods imported to the USA from Scotland, including whiskey,will have a 50% tariff.

This is UN style justice. The trial should have been held in the USA, and the POS should have been imprisoned here.

Jurisdiction was in Scotland for the trial because the flight crashed there.

We should have objected and had the trial in the USA.

BTW, there is no death penalty in Scotland.

Lesson learned.

4 posted on 08/22/2009 12:40:57 PM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

While the outrage is understandable, prior to the release it was common knowledge in UK that a pending appeal would quite likely show that the prisoner was framed by the British government.

Avoiding this embarassment may have been one reason for the release.


5 posted on 08/22/2009 12:41:48 PM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Funny how all this “outrage” is being vented after the fact. I’m sure the Brits coordinated this with us and got the green light behind the scenes. Gotta do Muslim outreach, y’know.


6 posted on 08/22/2009 12:44:22 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

“Our country has lost its way.”

.
As much as I dislike 0, what would you have liked for him to do? He certainly is not going to pick a fight with another Muslim country.

Do you think that Bush would have reacted otherwise? Hell, he is the one who used the phrase, “Religion of Peace” during a “State of the Union” address. There are still millions of Americans who take that statement for granted.


7 posted on 08/22/2009 12:47:23 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

The trial should have been held in the USA, and the POS should have been imprisoned here.

Jurisdiction was in Scotland for the trial because the flight crashed there.

We should have objected and had the trial in the USA.


this would have been impossible because this “crime” (terror act) happend as you have said not on american soil. there for the US had no jurisdiction in this case.


8 posted on 08/22/2009 12:54:00 PM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

“what would you have liked for him to do?”

1. State he is “utterly outraged” in lieu of “highly objectionable.”...for starts. Maybe throw in he “strongly condemns this horrific display of appreciation of a convicted mass murderer by a sitting head of state”..might be nice.
2. Recall ambassador
3. Invite families to DC to discuss his “highly objectionable” views rather than an out-of-control buddy of his for a beer, for absolutely no value at all.

Sounds like a start. What say you?


9 posted on 08/22/2009 12:54:16 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Excuse me, but it’s just not possible to “frame” the head of Libya’s secret police.


10 posted on 08/22/2009 12:56:23 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

0bama may say it’s objectionable... he may write in in an email... but I am betting he was in a quiet conversation and agreed to it, warning Brown that he’d have to publicly denounce it.


11 posted on 08/22/2009 12:56:27 PM PDT by theDentist (fybo qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

you mean you think there is ‘more to follow?’


12 posted on 08/22/2009 12:58:13 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

and he would have been in GITMO and possibly released months ago.


13 posted on 08/22/2009 12:59:45 PM PDT by wiggen (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WayzmX0WQvg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Not to mention the little fact that Libya confessed complicity in the attack, and paid one and a half billion dollars in compensation to the victims’ families.


14 posted on 08/22/2009 1:01:59 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Do you have any memory at all? Libya was terrified of Bush and couldn't renounce terrorism fast enough after the Iraqi invasion. Qaddafi also gave up all Libyan weapons, which now reside somewhere in the Carolinas. Besides, Obama claimed thru his entire campaign that he "would bring a new respect for America through out the World".

Where is it? Is this it?

15 posted on 08/22/2009 1:02:14 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deb

No doubt true.

I’ve been unable to find anything referring to him as such. He was Head of Security for the Libyan airline, and also pretty obviously a secret agent. But I doubt he was head of the secret police.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6018955/Abdelbaset-Ali-al-Megrahi-profile-of-the-Lockerbie-bomber.html


16 posted on 08/22/2009 1:02:33 PM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Everyone was in on it. All this after the fact posturing is pure unadulterated bull droppings.


17 posted on 08/22/2009 1:02:41 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl

Details, details. The Scots needed to sell more shortbread cookies. Screw the rule of the law and those pesky, greedy families.


18 posted on 08/22/2009 1:04:10 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner
Well the USA could have insisted on jurisdiction based on the fact that it was an American Airline. And it might have worked, but as you say, jurisdiction is usually decided on the situs of the case.

We should be making that argument if it ever, God forbid, happens again.And this result of early release is a good reason why a court might actually accept the argument.

Maybe a sniper from a mile away is now the answer.

19 posted on 08/22/2009 1:07:03 PM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carley

elaborate,...especially from our side of the pond.


20 posted on 08/22/2009 1:07:35 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson