Dr. Behe has already testified, under oath, that intelligent design is no different than astrology.
Is ICR defending astrology as well?
Is "under oath" supposed to mean something here? Perhaps that he isn't lying about what his opinion really is?
If we went to Mars and found a threaded metal bolt, it could be explained as a random natural phenomenon through the application of statistical possibilities, however slight.
(Monkey + Typewriter) X Time = Shakespeare
However, common sense says it can't happen.
This has been explained to evolutionists ad nauseum, with no effect. They repeat the same misrepresentation even after having the truth explained to them.
If you would actually read Dr. Behe's testimony instead of letting hack evolutionist websites do your thinking for you; you would see that Dr. Behe testified that ID was falsifiable in the same manner that astrology had been falsified.
But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your beliefs.